CHAPTER I
The Bishops of Rome and of Alexandria during the Reign
of Trajan.
About the twelfth year of the reign of Trajan the
above-mentioned bishop of the parish of Alexandria died, and Primus, the
fourth in succession from the apostles, was chosen to the office.
At that time also Alexander, the fifth in the line of
succession from Peter and Paul, received the episcopate at Rome, after
Evarestus had held the office eight years.
|
CHAPTER II
The Calamities of the Jews during Trajan’s Reign.
The teaching and the Church of our Saviour flourished
greatly and made progress from day to day; but the calamities of the Jews
increased, and they underwent a constant succession of evils. In the
eighteenth year of Trajan’s reign there was another disturbance of the
Jews, through which a great multitude of them perished. For in Alexandria and in the rest of Egypt, and also
in Cyrene, as if incited by some terrible and factious spirit, they rushed
into seditious measures against their fellow-inhabitants, the Greeks. The
insurrection increased greatly, and in the following year, while Lupus was
governor of all Egypt, it developed into a war of no mean magnitude. In the first attack it happened that they were
victorious over the Greeks, who fled to Alexandria and imprisoned and slew
the Jews that were in the city. But the Jews of Cyrene, although deprived
of their aid, continued to plunder the land of Egypt and to devastate its
districts, under the leadership of Lucuas. Against them the emperor sent
Marcius Turbo with a foot and naval force and also with a force of
cavalry. He carried on the war against them for a long time
and fought many battles, and slew many thousands of Jews, not only of
those of Cyrene, but also of those who dwelt in Egypt and had come to the
assistance of their king Lucuas. But the emperor, fearing that the Jews in
Mesopotamia would also make an attack upon the inhabitants of that
country, commanded Lucius Quintus to clear the province of them. And he
having marched against them slew a great multitude of those that dwelt
there; and in consequence of his success he was made governor of Judea by
the emperor. These events are recorded also in these very words by the
Greek historians that have written accounts of those times.
|
CHAPTER III
The Apologists that wrote in Defense of the
Faith during the Reign of Adrian.
After Trajan had reigned for nineteen
and a half years Ælius Adrian became his successor in the empire. To him
Quadratus addressed a discourse containing an apology for our religion,
because certain wicked men had attempted to trouble the Christians. The
work is still in the hands of a great many of the brethren, as also in our
own, and furnishes clear proofs of the man’s understanding and of his
apostolic orthodoxy.
He himself reveals the early date at which he lived
in the following words: “But the works of our Saviour were always present,
for they were genuine:—those that were healed, and those that were raised
from the dead, who were seen not only when they were healed and when they
were raised, but were also always present; and not merely while the
Saviour was on earth, but also after his death, they were alive for quite
a while, so that some of them lived even to our day.” Such then was
Quadratus. Aristides also, a believer earnestly devoted to our
religion, left, like Quadratus, an apology for the faith, addressed to
Adrian. His work, too, has been preserved even to the present day by a
great many persons.
|
CHAPTER IV
The Bishops of Rome and of Alexandria under
the Same Emperor.
In the third year of the same
reign, Alexander, bishop of Rome, died after holding office ten years. His
successor was Xystus. About the same time Primus, bishop of Alexandria, died in
the twelfth year of his episcopate, and was succeeded by Justus. |
CHAPTER V
The Bishops of Jerusalem from the Age of our
Saviour to the Period under Consideration
The chronology of the bishops of Jerusalem I have nowhere found preserved in
writing;
for tradition says that they were all short lived. But I have
learned this much from writings, that until the siege of the Jews, which
took place under Adrian, there were fifteen bishops in succession there,
all of whom are said to have been of Hebrew descent, and to have received
the knowledge of Christ in purity, so that they were approved by those who
were able to judge of such matters, and were deemed worthy of the
episcopate. For their whole church consisted then of believing Hebrews who
continued from the days of the apostles until the siege which took place
at this time; in which siege the Jews, having again rebelled against the
Romans, were conquered after severe battles. But since the bishops of the circumcision ceased at
this time, it is proper to give here a list of their names from the
beginning. The first, then, was James, the so-called brother of the Lord;
the second, Symeon; the third, Justus; the fourth, Zacchæus; the fifth,
Tobias; the sixth, Benjamin; the seventh, John; the eighth, Matthias; the
ninth, Philip; the tenth, Seneca; the eleventh, Justus; the twelfth, Levi;
the thirteenth, Ephres; the fourteenth, Joseph; and finally, the
fifteenth, Judas. These are the bishops of Jerusalem that lived between
the age of the apostles and the time referred to, all of them belonging to
the circumcision. In the twelfth year of the reign of Adrian, Xystus,
having completed the tenth year of his episcopate, was succeeded by
Telesphorus, the seventh in succession from the apostles. In the meantime,
after the lapse of a year and some months, Eumenes, the sixth in order,
succeeded to the leadership of the Alexandrian church, his predecessor
having held office eleven years. |
CHAPTER VI.
The Last Siege of the Jews under Adrian.
As the rebellion of the Jews at this time grew much more serious, Rufus, governor of Judea, after an auxiliary force had been sent him by the
emperor, using their madness as a pretext, proceeded against them without mercy,
and destroyed indiscriminately thousands of men and women and children, and in
accordance with the laws of war reduced their country to a state of complete
subjection. The leader of the Jews at this time was a man by the name of
Barcocheba (which signifies a star), who possessed the character of a robber
and a murderer, but nevertheless, relying upon his name, boasted to them, as if
they were slaves, that he possessed wonderful powers; and he pretended that he
was a star that had come down to them out of heaven to bring them light in the
midst of their misfortunes. The war raged most fiercely in the eighteenth year
of Adrian, at the city of Bithara, which was a very secure fortress,
situated not far from Jerusalem. When the siege had lasted a long time, and the
rebels had been driven to the last extremity by hunger and thirst, and the
instigator of the rebellion had suffered his just punishment, the whole nation
was prohibited from this time on by a decree, and by the commands of Adrian,
from ever going up to the country about Jerusalem. For the emperor gave orders
that they should not even see from a distance the land of their fathers. Such is
the account of Aristo of Pella. And thus, when the city had been emptied of
the Jewish nation and had suffered the total destruction of its ancient
inhabitants, it was colonized by a different race, and the Roman city which
subsequently arose changed its name and was called Aelia, in honor of the
emperor AElius Adrian. And as the church there was now composed of Gentiles, the first one to assume the government of it after the
bishops of the circumcision was Marcus.
|
CHAPTER VII.
The Persons that became at that Time Leaders of Knowledge falsely so-called.
As the churches throughout the world were now shining like the most
brilliant stars, and faith in our Savior and Lord Jesus Christ was flourishing
among the whole human race, the demon who hates everything that is good, and
is always hostile to the truth, and most bitterly opposed to the salvation of
man, turned all his arts against the Church. In the beginning he armed
himself against it with, external persecutions. But now, being shut off from
the use of such means, he devised all sorts of plans, and employed other
methods in his conflict with the Church, using base and deceitful men as
instruments for the ruin of souls and as ministers of destruction. Instigated by
him, impostors and deceivers, assuming the name of our religion, brought to the
depth of ruin such of the believers as they could win over and at the same time,
by means of the deeds which they practiced, turned away from the path which
leads to the word of salvation those who were ignorant of the faith.
Accordingly there proceeded from that Menander, whom we have already mentioned
as the successor of Simon, a certain serpent-like power, double-tongued and
two-headed, which produced the leaders of two different heresies, Saturninus, an
Antiochian by birth, and Basilides, an Alexandrian. The former of these
established schools of godless heresy in Syria, the latter in Alexandria.
Irenaeus states that the false teaching of Saturninus agreed in most
respects with that of Menander, but that Basilides, under the pretext of
unspeakable mysteries, invented monstrous fables, and carried the fictions of
his impious heresy quite beyond bounds. But as there were at that time a great
many members of the Church who were fighting for the truth and defending
apostolic and ecclesiastical doctrine with uncommon eloquence, so there were
some also that furnished posterity through their writings with means of defense
against the heresies to which we have referred. Of these there has come
down to us a most powerful refutation of Basilides by Agrippa Castor, one
of the most renowned writers of that day, which shows the terrible imposture of
the man. While exposing his mysteries he says that Basilides wrote twenty-four
books upon the Gospel, and that he invented prophets for himself named
Barcabbas and Barcoph, and others that had no existence, and that he gave
them barbarous names in order to amaze those who marvel at such things; that he
taught also that the eating of meat offered to idols and the unguarded
renunciation of the faith in times of persecution were matters of indifference; and that he enjoined upon his followers, like
Pythagoras, a silence of
five years. Other similar things the above-mentioned writer has recorded
concerning Basilides, and has ably exposed the error of his heresy. Irenaeus
also writes that Carpocrates was a contemporary of these men, and that he
was the father of another heresy, called the heresy of the Gnostics, who
did not wish to transmit any longer the magic arts of Simon, as that one had done, in secret, but openly.
For they boasted -- as of something great
-- of love potions that were carefully prepared by them, and of certain demons
that sent them dreams and lent them their protection, and of other similar
agencies; and in accordance with these things they taught that it was necessary
for those who wished to enter fully into their mysteries, or rather into their
abominations, to practice all the worst kinds of wickedness, on the ground that
they could escape the cosmic powers, as they called them, in no other way than
by discharging their obligations to them all by infamous-conduct. Thus it came to pass that the
malignant demon, making use of these ministers, on the one hand enslaved those
that were so pitiably led astray by them to their own destruction, while on the
other hand he furnished to the unbelieving heathen abundant opportunities for
slandering the divine word, inasmuch as the reputation of these men brought
infamy upon the whole race of Christians. In this way, therefore, it came to
pass that there was spread abroad in regard to us among the unbelievers of that
age, the infamous and most absurd suspicion that we practiced unlawful commerce
with mothers and sisters, and enjoyed impious feasts. He did not,
however, long succeed in these artifices, as the truth established itself and in
time shone with great brilliancy. For the machinations of its enemies were
refuted by its power and speedily vanished. One new heresy arose after another,
and the former ones always passed away, and now at one time, now at another, now
in one way, now in other ways, were lost in ideas of various kinds and various
forms. But the splendor of the catholic and only true Church, which is always
the same, grew in magnitude and power, and reflected its piety and simplicity
and freedom, and the modesty and purity of its inspired life and philosophy to
every nation both of Greeks and of Barbarians. At the same time the
slanderous accusations which had been brought against the whole Church also
vanished, and there remained our teaching alone, which has prevailed over all,
and which is acknowledged to be superior to all in dignity and temperance, and
in divine and philosophical doctrines. So that none of them now ventures to
affix a base calumny upon our faith, or any such slander as our ancient enemies
formerly delighted to utter. Nevertheless, in those times the truth again
called forth many champions who fought in its defense against the godless
heresies, refuting them not only with oral, but also with written arguments.
|
CHAPTER VIII.
Ecclesiastical
Writers. Among these Hegesippus was well known. We have already quoted his words a number of times,
relating
events which happened in the time of the apostles according to his account. He
records in five books the true tradition of apostolic doctrine in a most simple
style, and he indicates the time in which he flourished when he writes as
follows concerning those that first set up idols: "To whom they erected
cenotaphs and temples, as is done to the present day. Among whom is also
Antinous, a slave of the Emperor Adrian, in whose honor are celebrated also
the Antinoian games, which were instituted in our day. For he [i.e. Adrian] also
founded a city named after Antinous, and appointed prophets." At the
same time also Justin, a genuine lover of the true philosophy, was still
continuing to busy himself with Greek literature. He indicates (his time in
the Apology which he addressed to Antonine, where he writes as follows: "We do not think it out of place to mention here Antinous also, who lived
in our day, and whom all were driven by fear to worship as a god, although they
knew who he was and whence he came." The same writer, speaking of the
Jewish war which took place at that time, adds the following: "For in
the late Jewish war Barcocheba, the leader of the Jewish rebellion, commanded
that Christians alone should be visited with terrible punishments unless
they would deny and blaspheme Jesus Christ." And in the same work he shows
that his conversion from Greek philosophy to Christianity was not without
reason, but that it was the result of deliberation on his part. His words are as
follows: "For I myself, while I was delighted with the doctrines of
Plato, and heard the Christians slandered, and saw that they were afraid neither
of death nor of anything else ordinarily looked upon as terrible, concluded that
it was impossible that they could be living in wickedness and pleasure. For what
pleasure-loving or intemperate man, or what man that counts it good to feast on
human flesh, could welcome death that he might be deprived of his enjoyments,
and would not rather strive to continue permanently his present life, and to
escape the notice of the rulers, instead of giving himself up to be put to
death?" The same writer, moreover, relates that Adrian having received from
Serennius Granianus, a most distinguished governor, a letter in behalf
of the Christians, in which he stated that it was not just to slay the
Christians without a regular accusation and trial, merely for the sake of
gratifying the outcries of the populace, sent a rescript to Minucius Fundanus, proconsul of Asia, comrounding him to condemn no one without an
indictment and a well-grounded accusation. And he gives a copy of the epistle,
preserving the original Latin in which it was written, and prefacing it
with the following words: "Although from the epistle of the greatest
and most illustrious Emperor Adrian, your father, we have good ground to demand
that you order judgment to be given as we have desired, yet we have asked this
not because it was ordered by Adrian, but rather because we know that what we
ask is just. And we have subjoined the copy of Adrian's epistle that you may
know that we are speaking the truth in this matter also. And this is the
copy." After these words the author referred to gives the rescript in
Latin, which we have translated into Greek as accurately as we could. It
reads as follows:
|
CHAPTER IX.
The Epistle of Adrian, decreeing that we should not be punished without a
Trial.
"To Minucius Fundanus. I have received an epistle, written to me
by Serennius Granianus, a most illustrious man, whom you have succeeded. It does
not seem right to me that the matter should be passed by without examination,
lest the men be harassed and opportunity be given to the informers for
practicing villainy. If, therefore, the inhabitants of the province can clearly
sustain this petition against the Christians so as to give answer in a court of
law, let them pursue this course alone, but let them not have resort to men's
petitions and outcries. For it is far more proper, if any one wishes to make an
accusation, that you should examine into it. If any one therefore accuses them
and shows that they are doing anything contrary to the laws, do you pass
judgment according to the heinousness of the crime. But, by Hercules! if any
one bring an accusation through mere calumny, decide in regard to his
criminality, and see to it that you inflict punishment." Such are
the contents of Adrian's rescript.
|
CHAPTER X.
The Bishops of Rome and of Alexandria during
the Reign of Antoninus.
Adrian having died after a reign of twenty-one years, was succeeded in the government of the Romans by Antoninus, called the Pious. In the first year of his reign Telesphorus
died in the eleventh year of his episcopate, and Hyginus became bishop of Rome. Irenaeus records that Telesphorus' death was made glorious by martyrdom,
and in the same connection he states that in the time of the above-mentioned Roman bishop Hyginus, Valentinus, the founder of a sect of his own, and Cerdon, the author of Marcion's error, were both well known at Rome.
He writes as follows:
|
CHAPTER XI.
The Heresiarchs of that Age. "For Valentinus came to Rome under 1 Hyginus, flourished under Plus, and remained until
Anicetus. Cerdon also, Marby his martyrdom." After these words, before giving the account of Polycarp, they record the events which befell the rest of the martyrs, and describe the great firmness which they exhibited in the midst of their pains. For they say that the bystanders were struck with amazement when they saw them lacerated with scourges even to the innermost veins and arteries, so that the hidden inward parts of the body, both their bowels and their members, were exposed to view; and then laid upon sea-shells and certain pointed spits, and subjected to every species of punishment and of torture, and finally thrown as food to wild beasts. And they record that the most noble Germanicus
especially distinguished himself, overcoming by the grace of God the fear of bodily death implanted by nature. When indeed the proconsul
wished to persuade him, and urged his youth, and besought him, as he was very young and vigorous, to take compassion on himself, he did not hesitate, but eagerly lured the beast toward himself, all but compelling and irritating him, in order that he might the sooner be freed from their unrighteous and lawless life. After his glorious death the whole multitude marveling at the bravery of the God-beloved martyr and at the fortitude of the whole race of Christians, began to cry out suddenly, "Away with the atheists;
let Polycarp be sought." And when a very great tumult arose in consequence of the cries, a certain Phrygian, Quintus
by name, who was newly come from Phrygia, seeing the beasts and the additional tortures, was smitten with cowardice and gave up the attainment of salvation. But the above-mentioned epistle shows that he, too hastily and without proper discretion, had rushed forward with others to the tribunal, but when seized had furnished a clear proof to all, that it is not right for such persons rashly and recklessly to expose themselves to danger. Thus did matters turn out in connection with them.
But the most admirable Polycarp, when he first heard of these things, continued: undisturbed, preserved a quiet and unshaken mind, and determined to remain in the city. But being persuaded by his friends who en-treated and exhorted him to retire secretly, he went out to a farm not far distant from the city and abode there with a few companions, night and day doing nothing but wrestle with the Lord in prayer, beseeching and imploring, and asking peace for the churches throughout the whole world. For this was always his custom. And three days before his
arrest, while he was praying, he saw in a vision at night the pillow under his head suddenly seized by fire and consumed ; and upon this awakening he immediately interpreted the vision to those that were present, almost foretelling that which was about to happen, and declaring plainly to those that were with him that it would be necessary for him for Christ's sake to die by fire. Then, as those who were seeking him
pushed the search with vigor, they say that he was again constrained by the solicitude and love of the brethren to go to another farm. Thither his pursuers came after no long time, and seized two of the servants there, and tortured one of them for the purpose of learning from him Polycarp's hiding-place. And coming
late in the evening, they found him lying in an upper room, whence he might have gone to another house, but he would not, saying, "The will of God be done." And when
he learned that they were present, as the account says, he went down and spoke to them with a very cheerful and gentle countenance, so that those who did not already know the man thought that they beheld a miracle when they observed his advanced age and the gravity and firmness of his bearing, and they marveled that so much effort should be made to capture a man like him. But he did not hesitate, but immediately
gave orders that a table should be spread for them. Then he invited them to partake of a bounteous meal, and asked of them one hour that he might pray undisturbed. And when they had given permission, he stood up and prayed, being full of the grace of the Lord, so that those who were present and heard him praying were amazed, and many of them now repented that such a venerable and godly old man was about to be put to death. In addition to
these things the narrative concerning him contains the following account: "But when at length he had brought his prayer to an end, after remembering all that had ever come into contact with him, small and great, famous and obscure, and the whole catholic Church throughout the world, the hour of departure being come, they put him upon an ass and brought him to the city, it being a great Sabbath.
And he was met by
Herod, the captain of police, and by his father Nicetes, who took him into their carriage, and sitting beside him endeavored to persuade him, saying, ' For what harm is there in saying, Lord Caesar, and sacrificing and saving your,
life ?' He at first did not answer; but when they persisted, he said, ' I am not going to do what you advise me.' And when they failed to persuade him, they uttered dreadful words, and thrust him down with violence, so that as he descended from the carriage he lacerated his shin. But without turning round, he went on his way promptly and rapidly, as if nothing had happened to him, and was taken to the
stadium. But there was such a tumult in the stadium that not many heard a voice from heaven, which came to Polycarp as he was entering the place: ' Be strong, Polycarp, and play the man.'
And no one saw the speaker, but many of our people heard the voice. And when he was led forward, there was a great tumult, as they heard that Polycarp was taken. Finally, when he came up, the proconsul asked if he were Polycarp. And when he confessed that he was, he endeavored to persuade him to deny, saying, ' Have regard for thine age,' and other like things, which it is
their custom to say: ' Swear by the genius of Caesar; repent and say, Away with the Atheists.' But Polycarp, looking with dignified countenance upon the whole crowd that was gathered in the stadium, waved his hand to them, and groaned, and raising his eyes toward
heaven, said, ' Away with the Atheists.' But when the magistrate pressed him, and said, Swear, and I will release thee; revile Christ,' Polycarp said,' Fourscore and six years
have I been serving him, and he hath done me no wrong; how then can I blaspheme my king who saved me ? "But when he again persisted, and said, 'Swear by the genius of Caesar,' Polycarp replied, ' If thou vainly supposest that I will swear by the genius of Caesar, as thou sayest, feigning to be ignorant who I am, hear plainly: I am a Christian. But if thou desirest to learn the doctrine of Christianity, assign a day and hear.' The proconsul said, ' Persuade
the people.' But Polycarp said, 'As for thee, I thought thee worthy of an explanation; for we have been taught to render to princes and authorities ordained by God the honor that is due,
so long as it does not injure us; but as for these, I do not esteem them the proper persons to whom to make my defense.'
But the proconsul said, ' I have wild beasts; I will throw thee to them unless thou repent.' But he said, ' Call them; for repentance from better to worse is a change we cannot make. But it is a noble thing to turn from wickedness to righteousness.' But
he again said to him, ' If thou despisest the wild beasts, I will cause thee to be consumed by fire, unless thou repent.' But Polycarp said, ' Thou threatenest a fire which burneth for an hour, and after a little is quenched; for thou knowest not the fire of the future judgment and of the eternal punishment which is reserved for the impious. But why dost thou delay? Do what thou wilt.' Saying these and
other words besides, he was filled with courage and joy, and his face was suffused with grace, so that not only was he not terrified and dismayed by the words that were spoken to him, but, on the contrary, the proconsul was amazed, and sent his herald to proclaim three times in the midst of the stadium: ' Polycarp hath confessed that he is a Christian.' And when
this was proclaimed by the herald, the whole multitude, both of Gentiles and of Jews,
who dwelt in Smyrna, cried out with ungovernable wrath and with a great shout, 'This is the teacher of Asia, the father of the Christians, the over-thrower of our gods, who teacheth many not to sacrifice nor to worship.' When they
had said this, they cried out and asked the Asiarch Philip to let a lion loose upon Poly-carp.
But he said that it was not lawful for him, since he had closed the games. Then they thought fit to cry out with one accord that
Polycarp should be burned alive. For it was necessary that the vision should be fulfilled which had been shown him concerning his pillow, when he saw it burning while he was praying, and turned and said prophetically to the faithful that were with him, ' I must needs be burned alive.' These things were done with great speed, --more quickly than they were said,--the crowds immediately collecting from the workshops and baths timber and fagots, the Jews being especially
zealous in the work, as is their wont. But when the pile was ready, taking off all his upper garments, and loosing his girdle, he attempted also to remove his shoes, although he had never before done this, because of the effort which each of the faithful always made to touch his skin first; for he had been treated with all honor on account of his virtuous life even before his
gray hairs came. Forthwith then the materials prepared for the pile were placed about him; and as they were also about to nail him to the stake,
he said, ' Leave me thus; for he who hath given me strength to endure the fire, will also grant me strength to remain in the fire unmoved without being secured by you with nails.' So they did not nail him, but bound
him. And he, with his hands behind him, and bound like a noble ram taken from a great flock, an acceptable burnt-offering unto
God omnipotent, said, ' Father of thy beloved and blessed Son Jesus Christ, through whom we have received the knowledge of thee, the God of angels and of powers and of the whole creation and of the entire race of the righteous who live in thy presence, I bless thee that thou hast deemed me worthy of this day and hour that I might receive a portion in the number of the martyrs, in the cup of Christ, unto resurrection of eternal life,
both of soul and of body, in the immortality of the Holy Spirit. Among these may I be received before thee this day, in a rich and acceptable saccrifice, as thou, the faithful and true God, bast beforehand prepared and revealed, and hast fulfilled. Wherefore I praise thee also for everything; I bless thee, I glorify thee, through the eternal high priest, Jesus Christ, thy beloved Son, through whom, with him, in the Holy Spirit, be glory unto thee, both now
and for the ages to come, Amen.' When he had offered up his Amen and had finished his prayer, the firemen lighted the fire and as a great flame blazed out, we, to whom it was given to see, saw a wonder, and we were preserved that we might relate what happened to the others. For the fire presented
the appearance of a vault, like the sail of a vessel filled by the wind, and made a wall about the body of the martyr,
and it was in the midst not like flesh burning, but like gold and silver refined in a furnace. For we perceived such a fragrant odor, as of the fumes of frankincense or of some other precious spices. So
at length the lawless men, when they saw that the body could not be consumed by the fire, commanded an executioner
to approach and pierce him with the sword. And when he had done this there came forth a quantity of blood
so that it extinguished the fire; and the whole crowd marveled that there should be such a difference between the unbelievers and the elect, of whom this man also was one, the most wonderful teacher in our times, apostolic and prophetic, who was bishop of the catholic Church
in Smyrna. For every word which came from his mouth was accomplished and will be accomplished. But the
jealous and envious Evil One, the adversary of the race of the righteous, when he saw the greatness of his martyrdom, and his blameless life from the beginning, and when he saw him crowned with the crown of immortality and bearing off an incontestable prize, took care that not even his body should be taken away by us, although many desired to do it and to have communion with his holy flesh.
Accordingly certain ones secretly suggested to Nicetes, the father of Herod and brother of
Alce, that he should plead with the magistrate
not to give up his body, 'lest,' it was said, 'they should abandon the crucified One and begin to worship this man.'
They said these things at the suggestion and impulse of the Jews, who also watched as we were about to take it from the fire, not knowing that we shall never be able either to forsake Christ, who suffered for the salvation of the whole world of those that
are saved, or to worship any other. For we worship him who is the Son of God, but the martyrs, as disciples and imitators of the Lord, we love as they deserve on account of their matchless affection for their own king and teacher. May we also be made partakers
and fellow-disciples with them. The centurion, therefore, when he saw the contentiousness exhibited by the Jews, placed him in the midst and burned him, as was their custom. And so we afterwards gathered up his bones. which were more valuable than precious stones and more to be esteemed than gold, and
laid them in a suitable place. There the Lord will permit us to come together as we are able, in gladness and joy to celebrate the birthday of his martyrdom,
for the commemoration of those who have already fought and for the training and preparation of those who
shall hereafter do the same. Such are the events that befell the blessed Polycarp, who suffered martyrdom in Smyrna with the eleven
from Philadelphia. This one man is remembered more than the others by all, so that even by the heathen he is talked about in every place." Of such an end was the admirable and
apostolic Polycarp deemed worthy, as recorded by the brethren of the church of Smyrna in their epistle which we have mentioned. In the same volume
concerning him are subjoined also other martyrdoms which took place in the same city, Smyrna, about the same period of time with Polycarp's martyrdom. Among them also Metrodorus, who appears to have been a proselyte of the Marcionitic sect, suffered death by fire. A celebrated martyr of those times was
a certain man named Pionius. Those who desire to know his several confessions, and the boldness of his speech, and his apologies in behalf of the faith before the people and the rulers, and his instructive addresses and moreover, his greetings to those who had yielded to temptation in the persecution, and the words of encouragement which he addressed to the brethren who came to visit him in prison, and the tortures which he endured in addition, and besides these the sufferings and the nailings, and his firmness on the pile, and his death after all the extraordinary trials,
--those we refer to that epistle which has been given in the Martyrdoms of the Ancients,
collected by us, and which contains a very full account of him. And there are also records extant of others
that suffered martyrdom in Pergamus, a city
of Asia, -- of Carpus and Papylus, and a woman named Agathonice, who, after many and illustrious testimonies, gloriously ended their lives.
|
CHAPTER XII
The
Apology of Justin addressed to Antoninus.
“To
the Emperor Titus Ælius Adrian Antoninus Pius Cæsar Augustus, and to Verissimus his son, the philosopher, and to Lucius the philosopher, own son of Cæsar and adopted son of Pius, a lover of
learning, and to the sacred senate and to the whole Roman people, I , Justin,
son of Priscus and grandson of Bacchius, of Flavia Neapolis in Palestine, Syria, present this address
and petition in behalf of those men of every nation who are unjustly hated and
persecuted, I myself being one of them.” And the same emperor having learned
also from other brethren in Asia of the injuries of all kinds which they were
suffering from the inhabitants of the province, thought it proper to address
the following ordinance to the Common Assembly of Asia. |
CHAPTER XIII
The
Epistle of Antoninus to the Common Assembly of Asia in Regard to our Doctrine.
The Emperor Cæsar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus, Armenicus, Pontifex Maximus, for the fifteenth time Tribune,
for the third time Consul, to the Common Assembly of Asia, Greeting. I know that the gods also take care that such
persons do not escape detection. For they would much rather punish those who
will not worship them than you would. But you throw them into confusion, and while you
accuse them of atheism you only confirm them in the opinion which they hold.
It would indeed be more desirable for them, when accused, to appear to die for
their God, than to live. Wherefore also they come off victorious when they
give up their lives rather than yield obedience to your commands. And in regard to the earthquakes which have been and
are still taking place, it is not improper to admonish you who lose heart whenever
they occur, and nevertheless are accustomed to compare your conduct with
theirs. They indeed become the more confident in God, while
you, during the whole time, neglect, in apparent ignorance, the other gods and
the worship of the Immortal, and oppress and persecute even unto death the
Christians who worship him. But in regard to these persons, many of the
governors of the provinces wrote also to our most divine father, to whom he
wrote in reply that they should not trouble these people unless it should
appear that they were attempting something affecting the Roman government. And to me also many have sent communications concerning these
men, but I have replied to them in the same way that my father did. But if any one still persists in bringing
accusations against any of these people as such, the person who is accused
shall be acquitted of the charge, even if it appear that he is one of them,
but the accuser shall be punished. Published in Ephesus in the Common Assembly of Asia.” To these things Melito, bishop of the church of Sardis, and a man well known at that
time, is a witness, as is clear from his words in the Apology which he addressed
to the Emperor Verus in behalf of our doctrine.
|
CHAPTER XIV
The
Circumstances related of Polycarp, a Friend of the Apostles.
At
this time, while Anicetus was at the head of the church of Rome, Irenæus relates that Polycarp, who was still alive, was at
Rome, and that he had a conference with Anicetus on a question
concerning the day of the paschal feast. And the same writer gives another account of Polycarp
which I feel constrained to add to that which has been already related in
regard to him. The account is taken from the third book of Irenæus’ work
Against Heresies, and is as follows: “But Polycarp also was not only instructed by the apostles, and acquainted
with many that had seen Christ, but was also appointed by apostles in Asia
bishop of the church of Smyrna. We too saw him in our early youth; for he lived a
long time, and died, when a very old man, a glorious and most illustrious
martyr’s death, having always taught the things which he had learned from the
apostles, which the Church also hands down, and which alone are true. To these things all the Asiatic churches testify, as
do also those who, down to the present time, have succeeded Polycarp, who was a much more trustworthy and certain witness of the
truth than Valentinus and Marcion and the rest of the heretics. He also was in Rome in the time of Anicetus and caused many to turn away from the above-mentioned
heretics to the Church of God, proclaiming that he had received from the
apostles this one and only system of truth which has been transmitted by the
Church.And there are those that heard from him that John,
the disciple of the Lord, going to bathe in Ephesus and seeing Cerinthus
within, ran out of the bath-house without bathing, crying, ‘Let us flee, lest
even the bath fall, because Cerinthus, the enemy of the truth, is within.’ And Polycarp himself, when Marcion once met him and said, ‘Knowest thou us?’ replied, ‘I know the first born of Satan.’ Such
caution did the apostles and their disciples exercise that they might not even
converse with any of those who perverted the truth; as Paul also said, ‘A man
that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, reject;
knowing he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of
himself.’ There is also a very powerful epistle of Polycarp
written to the Philippians, from which those that wish to do so, and that are concerned
for their own salvation, may learn the character of his faith and the
preaching of the truth.” Such is the account of Irenæus. But Polycarp, in his above-mentioned epistle to the
Philippians, which is still extant, has made use of certain testimonies drawn
from the First Epistle of Peter. And when Antoninus, called Pius, had completed the
twenty-second year of his reign, Marcus Aurelius Verus, his son, who was also called Antoninus,
succeeded him, together with his brother Lucius.
|
CHAPTER XV
Under
Verus, Polycarp with Others
suffered Martyrdom at Smyrna.
At
this time,
when the greatest persecutions were exciting Asia, Polycarp
ended his life by martyrdom. But I consider it most important that his death, a
written account of which is still extant, should be recorded in this history.
There is a letter, written in the name of the church
over which he himself presided, to the parishes in Pontus, which relates the events that befell him, in the following
words:
“The church of God which dwelleth in Philomelium, and to all the parishes of the holy catholic Church in every place; mercy and peace and love from God the Father be
multiplied. We write unto you, brethren, an account of what happened to those that
suffered martyrdom and to the blessed Polycarp, who put an end to the
persecution, having, as it were, sealed it by his
martyrdom.”
After these words, before giving the account of Polycarp, they record the events which befell the rest of the martyrs, and
describe the great firmness which they exhibited in the midst of their pains.
For they say that the bystanders were struck with amazement when they saw them
lacerated with scourges even to the innermost veins and arteries, so that the
hidden inward parts of the body, both their bowels and their members, were
exposed to view; and then laid upon sea-shells and certain pointed spits, and
subjected to every species of punishment and of torture, and finally thrown as
food to wild beasts.
And they record that the most noble Germanicus especially distinguished himself, overcoming by the grace of
God the fear of bodily death implanted by nature. When indeed the proconsul wished to persuade him, and urged his youth, and besought him,
as he was very young and vigorous, to take compassion on himself, he did not
hesitate, but eagerly lured the beast toward himself, all but compelling and
irritating him, in order that he might the sooner be freed from their
unrighteous and lawless life.
After his glorious death the whole multitude, marveling
at the bravery of the God-beloved martyr and at the fortitude of the whole race
of Christians, began to cry out suddenly, “Away with the atheists; let Polycarp be sought.”
And when a very great tumult arose in consequence of
the cries, a certain Phrygian, Quintus by name, who was newly come from Phrygia, seeing the beasts and
the additional tortures, was smitten with cowardice and gave up the attainment
of salvation.
But the above-mentioned epistle shows that he, too
hastily and without proper discretion, had rushed forward with others to the
tribunal, but when seized had furnished a clear proof to all, that it is not
right for such persons rashly and recklessly to expose themselves to danger.
Thus did matters turn out in connection with them.
But the most admirable Polycarp, when he first heard of
these things, continued undisturbed, preserved a quiet and unshaken mind, and
determined to remain in the city. But being persuaded by his friends who
entreated and exhorted him to retire secretly, he went out to a farm not far
distant from the city and abode there with a few companions, night and day doing
nothing but wrestle with the Lord in prayer, beseeching and imploring, and
asking peace for the churches throughout the whole world. For this was always
his custom.
And three days before his arrest, while he was
praying, he saw in a vision at night the pillow under his head suddenly seized
by fire and consumed; and upon this awakening he immediately interpreted the
vision to those that were present, almost foretelling that which was about to
happen, and declaring plainly to those that were with him that it would be
necessary for him for Christ’s sake to die by fire.
Then, as those who were seeking him pushed the search
with vigor, they say that he was again constrained by the solicitude and love of
the brethren to go to another farm. Thither his pursuers came after no long
time, and seized two of the servants there, and tortured one of them for the
purpose of learning from him Polycarp’s hiding-place.
And coming late in the evening, they found him lying
in an upper room, whence he might have gone to another house, but he would not,
saying, “The will of God be done.”
And when he learned that they were present, as the
account says, he went down and spoke to them with a very cheerful and gentle
countenance, so that those who did not already know the man thought that they
beheld a miracle when they observed his advanced age and the gravity and
firmness of his bearing, and they marveled that so much effort should be made to
capture a man like him.
But he did not hesitate, but immediately gave orders
that a table should be spread for them. Then he invited them to partake of a
bounteous meal, and asked of them one hour that he might pray undisturbed. And
when they had given permission, he stood up and prayed, being full of the grace
of the Lord, so that those who were present and heard him praying were amazed,
and many of them now repented that such a venerable and godly old man was about
to be put to death.
In addition to these things the narrative concerning
him contains the following account: “But when at length he had brought his
prayer to an end, after remembering all that had ever come into contact with
him, small and great, famous and obscure, and the whole catholic Church
throughout the world, the hour of departure being come, they put him upon an ass
and brought him to the city, it being a great Sabbath. And he was met by Herod,
the captain of police, and by his father Nicetes, who took him into their carriage,
and sitting beside him endeavored to persuade him, saying, ‘For what harm is
there in saying, Lord Cæsar, and sacrificing and saving your life?’ He at first
did not answer; but when they persisted, he said, ‘I am not going to do what you
advise me.’
And when they failed to persuade him, they uttered
dreadful words, and thrust him down with violence, so that as he descended from
the carriage he lacerated his shin. But without turning round, he went on his
way promptly and rapidly, as if nothing had happened to him, and was taken to
the stadium.
But there was such a tumult in the stadium that not
many heard a voice from heaven, which came to Polycarp as he was entering the
place: ‘Be strong, Polycarp, and play the man.’ And no one saw the speaker, but many of our people heard the
voice.
And when he was led forward, there was a great tumult,
as they heard that Polycarp was taken. Finally, when he came up, the proconsul
asked if he were Polycarp. And when he confessed that he was, he endeavored to
persuade him to deny, saying, ‘Have regard for thine age,’ and other like
things, which it is their custom to say: ‘Swear by the genius of Cæsar; repent and say, Away with the Atheists.’
But Polycarp, looking with dignified countenance upon
the whole crowd that was gathered in the stadium, waved his hand to them, and
groaned, and raising his eyes toward heaven, said, ‘Away with the Atheists.’
But when the magistrate pressed him, and said, ‘Swear,
and I will release thee; revile Christ,’ Polycarp said, ‘Fourscore and six years have I been serving him, and he hath done me no wrong; how then
can I blaspheme my king who saved me?’
“But when he again persisted, and said, ‘Swear by the
genius of Cæsar,’ Polycarp replied, ‘If thou vainly supposest that I will swear
by the genius of Cæsar, as thou sayest, feigning to be ignorant who I am, hear
plainly: I am a Christian. But if thou desirest to learn the doctrine of
Christianity, assign a day and hear.’
The proconsul said, ‘Persuade the people.’ But Polycarp said, ‘As for thee, I thought thee worthy of an explanation; for we
have been taught to render to princes and authorities ordained by God the honor
that is due, so long as it does not injure us; but as for these, I do not esteem them the proper persons to
whom to make my defense.’
But the proconsul said, ‘I have wild beasts; I will
throw thee to them unless thou repent.’ But he said, ‘Call them; for repentance
from better to worse is a change we cannot make. But it is a noble thing to turn
from wickedness to righteousness.’
But he again said to him, ‘If thou despisest the wild
beasts, I will cause thee to be consumed by fire, unless thou repent.’ But
Polycarp said, ‘Thou threatenest a fire which burneth for an hour, and after a
little is quenched; for thou knowest not the fire of the future judgment and of
the eternal punishment which is reserved for the impious. But why dost thou
delay? Do what thou wilt.’
Saying these and other words besides, he was filled
with courage and joy, and his face was suffused with grace, so that not only was
he not terrified and dismayed by the words that were spoken to him, but, on the
contrary, the proconsul was amazed, and sent his herald to proclaim three times
in the midst of the stadium: ‘Polycarp hath confessed that he is a Christian.’
And when this was proclaimed by the herald, the whole
multitude, both of Gentiles and of Jews, who dwelt in Smyrna, cried out with ungovernable wrath and with
a great shout, ‘This is the teacher of Asia, the father of the Christians, the overthrower of our gods, who teacheth many not to sacrifice nor to worship.’
When they had said this, they cried out and asked the Asiarch Philip to let a lion loose upon Polycarp. But he said that it was not
lawful for him, since he had closed the games. Then
they thought fit to cry out with one accord that Polycarp should be burned
alive.
For it was necessary that the vision should be
fulfilled which had been shown him concerning his pillow, when he saw it burning
while he was praying, and turned and said prophetically to the faithful that
were with him, ‘I must needs be burned alive.’
These things were done with great speed,—more quickly
than they were said,—the crowds immediately collecting from the workshops and
baths timber and fagots, the Jews being especially zealous in the work, as is
their wont.
But when the pile was ready, taking off all his upper
garments, and loosing his girdle, he attempted also to remove his shoes,
although he had never before done this, because of the effort which each of the
faithful always made to touch his skin first; for he had been treated with all
honor on account of his virtuous life even before his gray hairs came.
Forthwith then the materials prepared for the pile
were placed about him; and as they were also about to nail him to the stake, he said, ‘Leave me thus; for he who hath given me strength to
endure the fire, will also grant me strength to remain in the fire unmoved
without being secured by you with nails.’ So they did not nail him, but bound
him.
And he, with his hands behind him, and bound like a
noble ram taken from a great flock, an acceptable burnt-offering unto God
omnipotent, said,
‘Father of thy beloved and blessed Son Jesus Christ, through whom we have received the knowledge of
thee, the God of angels and of powers and of the whole creation and of the
entire race of the righteous who live in thy presence, I bless thee that thou
hast deemed me worthy of this day and hour, that I might receive a portion in
the number of the martyrs, in the cup of Christ, unto resurrection of eternal
life, both of soul and of body, in the immortality of the Holy
Spirit.
Among these may I be received before thee this day, in
a rich and acceptable sacrifice, as thou, the faithful and true God, hast
beforehand prepared and revealed, and hast fulfilled.
Wherefore I praise thee also for everything; I bless
thee, I glorify thee, through the eternal high priest, Jesus Christ, thy beloved
Son, through whom, with him, in the Holy Spirit, be glory unto thee, both now
and for the ages to come, Amen.’
When he had offered up his Amen and had finished his
prayer, the firemen lighted the fire and as a great flame blazed out, we, to
whom it was given to see, saw a wonder, and we were preserved that we might
relate what happened to the others.
For the fire presented the appearance of a vault, like
the sail of a vessel filled by the wind, and made a wall about the body of the
martyr, and it was in the midst not like flesh burning, but like gold
and silver refined in a furnace. For we perceived such a fragrant odor, as of
the fumes of frankincense or of some other precious spices.
So at length the lawless men, when they saw that the
body could not be consumed by the fire, commanded an executioner to approach and pierce him with the sword.
And when he had done this there came forth a quantity
of blood so that it extinguished the fire; and the whole crowd marveled
that there should be such a difference between the unbelievers and the elect, of
whom this man also was one, the most wonderful teacher in our times, apostolic
and prophetic, who was bishop of the catholic Church in Smyrna. For every word which came from his mouth was
accomplished and will be accomplished.
But the jealous and envious Evil One, the adversary of
the race of the righteous, when he saw the greatness of his martyrdom, and his
blameless life from the beginning, and when he saw him crowned with the crown of
immortality and bearing off an incontestable prize, took care that not even his
body should be taken away by us, although many desired to do it and to have
communion with his holy flesh.
Accordingly certain ones secretly suggested to Nicetes, the father of Herod and brother of Alce, that he should plead with the magistrate not
to give up his body, ‘lest,’ it was said, ‘they should abandon the crucified One
and begin to worship this man.’ They said these things at the suggestion and impulse of the
Jews, who also watched as we were about to take it from the fire, not knowing
that we shall never be able either to forsake Christ, who suffered for the
salvation of the whole world of those that are saved, or to worship any other.
For we worship him who is the Son of God, but the
martyrs, as disciples and imitators of the Lord, we love as they deserve on
account of their matchless affection for their own king and teacher. May we also
be made partakers and fellow-disciples with them.
The centurion, therefore, when he saw the
contentiousness exhibited by the Jews, placed him in the midst and burned him,
as was their custom. And so we afterwards gathered up his bones, which were more
valuable than precious stones and more to be esteemed than gold, and laid them
in a suitable place.
There the Lord will permit us to come together as we
are able, in gladness and joy to celebrate the birthday of his martyrdom, for
the commemoration of those who have already fought and for the training and
preparation of those who shall hereafter do the same.
Such are the events that befell the blessed Polycarp,
who suffered martyrdom in Smyrna with the eleven from Philadelphia. This one man
is remembered more than the others by all, so that even by the heathen he is
talked about in every place.”
Of such an end was the admirable and apostolic Polycarp deemed worthy, as recorded by the brethren of the church of Smyrna in
their epistle which we have mentioned. In the same volume concerning him are
subjoined also other martyrdoms which took place in the same city, Smyrna, about
the same period of time with Polycarp’s martyrdom. Among them also Metrodorus,
who appears to have been a proselyte of the Marcionitic sect, suffered death by
fire.
A celebrated martyr of those times was a certain man
named Pionius. Those who desire to know his several confessions, and the
boldness of his speech, and his apologies in behalf of the faith before the
people and the rulers, and his instructive addresses and, moreover, his
greetings to those who had yielded to temptation in the persecution, and the
words of encouragement which he addressed to the brethren who came to visit him
in prison, and the tortures which he endured in addition, and besides these the
sufferings and the nailings, and his firmness on the pile, and his death after
all the extraordinary trials,
—those
we refer to that epistle which has been given in the Martyrdoms of the Ancients,
collected by us, and which contains a very full account of him.
And there are also records extant of others that
suffered martyrdom in Pergamus, a city of Asia,—of Carpus and Papylus, and a
woman named Agathonice, who, after many and illustrious testimonies, gloriously
ended their lives.
|
CHAPTER XVI.
Justin the Philosopher preaches the Word of Christ in Rome and suffers Martyrdom.
About this time Justin, who was mentioned by us just above, after he had addressed a second work in behalf of our doctrines to the rulers already named,
was crowned with divine martyrdom, in consequence of a plot laid against him by
Crescens, a philosopher who emulated the life and manners of the Cynics, whose name he bore. After Justin had frequently refuted him in public discussions he won by his martyrdom the prize of victory, dying in behalf of the truth which he preached. And he himself, a man most learned in the
truth, in his Apology already referred to clearly predicts how this was about to happen to him, although it had not yet occurred. His words are as follows:
" I, too, therefore, expect to be plotted against and put in the stocks by some one of those whom I have named, or perhaps by Crescens, that unphilosophical and vainglorious man. For the man is not worthy to be called a philosopher who publicly bears witness against those concerning whom he knows nothing, declaring, for the sake of captivating and pleasing the multitude, that the Christians are atheistical and impious.
Doing this he errs greatly. For if he assails us without having read the teachings of Christ, he is thoroughly depraved, and is much worse than the illiterate, who often guard against discussing and bearing false witness about matters which they do not understand. And if he has read them and does not understand the majesty that is in them, or, understanding it, does these things in order that he may not be suspected of being an adherent, he is far more base and totally depraved, being enslaved to vulgar applause and irrational fear. For I
would have you know that when I proposed certain questions of the sort and asked him in regard to them, I learned and proved that he indeed knows nothing. And to show that I speak the truth I am ready, if these disputations have not been reported to you, to discuss the questions again in your presence. And this indeed would be an act worthy of an emperor. But if my questions and his 6
answers have been made known to you, it is obvious to you that he knows nothing about our affairs; or if he knows, but does not dare to speak because of those who hear him, he shows himself to be, as I have already said,
not a philosopher, but a vainglorious man, who indeed does not even regard that most admirable saying of Socrates."
These are the words of Justin.
And that he met his death as he had predicted that he would, in consequence of the machinations of Crescens, is stated by
Tatian, a than who early in life lectured upon the sciences of the Greeks and won no little fame in them, and who has left a great many
monuments of himself in his writings. He records this fact in his work against the Greeks, where he writes as follows:
" And that most admirable Justin declared with truth that the aforesaid persons were like robbers."
Then, after making some remarks about the philosophers, he continues as follows:
"Crescens, indeed, who made his nest in the great city, surpassed all in his unnatural lust, and was wholly devoted to the love of money.
And he who taught that death should be despised, was himself so greatly in fear of it that he endeavored to inflict death, as if it were a great evil, upon Justin, because the latter, when preaching the truth, had proved that the philosophers were gluttons and
impostors." And such was the cause of Justin's martyrdom.
|
CHAPTER XVII.
The Martyrs whom Justin intentions in his Own Work.
The same man, before his conflict, mentions in his first Apology others that suffered martyrdom before him, and most fittingly records the following events. He writes thus:
"A certain woman lived with a dissolute husband; she herself, too, having formerly been of the same character. But when she came to the knowledge of the teachings of Christ, she became temperate, and endeavored to persuade her husband likewise to be temperate, repeating the teachings, and declaring the punishment in eternal fire which shall come upon those who do not live temperately
and conformably to right reason. But he, continuing in the same excesses, alienated his wife by his conduct. For she finally, thinking it wrong to live as a wife with a man who, contrary to the law of nature and right, sought every possible means of pleasure, desired
to be divorced from him. And when she was earnestly entreated by her friends, who counseled her still to remain with him, on the ground that her husband might some time give hope of amendment, she did violence to
herself and remained. But when her husband had gone to Alexandria, and was reported to be conducting himself still worse, she in order that she might not, by continuing in wedlock, and by sharing his board and bed, become a partaker in his lawlessness and impiety--gave him what we a call a bill of divorce and left him. But her noble and
excellent husband,--instead of rejoicing, as he ought to have done, that she had given up those actions which she had formerly recklessly committed with the servants and hirelings, when she delighted in drunkenness and in every vice, and that she desired him likewise to give them up, -- when she had gone from him contrary to his wish, brought an accusation concerning her, declaring that she was a Christian. And
she petitioned you, the emperor, that she might be permitted first to set her affairs in order, and afterwards, after the settlement of her affairs, to make her defense against the accusation. And this you granted. But
he who had once been her husband, being no longer able to prosecute her, directed his attacks against a certain
Ptolemaeus, who had been her teacher in the doctrines of Christianity, and whom Urbicius
had punished. Against him he proceeded in the following manner:
"He persuaded a centurion who was his friend to cast Ptolemaeus into prison, and to take him and ask him this only: whether he were a Christian? And when Ptolemaeus, who was a lover of truth, and not of a deceitful and false disposition, confessed that he was a Christian, the centurion bound him and punished him for a long time in the prison. And finally,
when the man was brought before Urbicius he was likewise asked this question only: whether he were a Christian? And again, conscious of the benefits which he enjoyed through the teaching of Christ, he confessed his schooling in divine virtue. For whoever
denies that he is a Christian, either denies because he despises Christianity, or he avoids confession because he is conscious that he is unworthy and an alien to it; neither of which is the case with the true Christian. And when
Urbicius commanded that he be led away to punishment, a certain Lucius, who was also a Christian, seeing judgment so unjustly passed,
said to Urbicius, ' Why have you punished this I man who is not an adulterer, nor a fornicator, nor a murderer, nor a thief, nor a robber, nor has been convicted of committing any crime at all, but has confessed that he beam the name of Christian? You do not judge, O Urbicius, in a manner befitting the Emperor Pins, or the philosophical son
of Caesar, or the sacred senate.' And without making any other reply, he said to Lucius, ' Thou also
seemest to me to be such an one.' And when Lucius said, 'Certainly,' he again commanded that he too should be led away to punishment. But he professed his thanks, for he was liberated, he added, from such wicked rulers and was going to the good Father and King, God. And still a third having come forward was condemned to be punished."
To this, Justin fittingly and consistently adds the words which we quoted above,
saying, "I, too, therefore expect to be plotted against by some one of those whom I have named," &c."
|
CHAPTER XVIII.
The Works of Justin which have come down to us.
This writer has left us a great many monuments of a mind educated and practiced in divine things, which are replete with profitable matter of every kind. To them we shall refer the studious, noting as we proceed those
that have come to our knowledge. There is a certain discourse of his in defense of our doctrine addressed to Antoninus surnamed t the Pious, and to his sons, and to the Roman senate. Another work contains his second Apology
in behalf of our faith, which he offered to him who was the successor of the emperor mentioned and who bore the same name, Antoninus Verus, the one whose times we are now recording. Also another work
against the Greeks, in which he discourses at length upon most of the questions at issue between us and the Greek philosophers, and discusses the nature of demons. It is not necessary for me to add any of these things here. And still another work of his against the
Greeks has come down to us, to which he gave the title Refutation. And besides these another, On the Sovereignty of God,
which he establishes not only from our Scriptures, but also from the books of the Greeks. Still further, a work entitled
Psaltes, and another disputation On the Soul, in which, after pro-pounding various questions concerning the problem under discussion, he gives the opinions of the Greek philosophers, promising to refute it, and to present his own view in another work. He composed also a dialogue against
the Jews, which he held in the city of Ephesus with Trypho, a most distinguished man among the Hebrews of that day. In it he shows how the divine grace urged him on to the doctrine of the faith, and with what earnestness he had formerly pursued philosophical studies, and how ardent a search he had made for the truth.
And he records of the Jews in the same work, that they were plotting against the teaching of Christ, asserting the
same things against Trypho: "Not only did you not repent of the wickedness which you had committed, but you selected at that time chosen men, and you sent them out from Jerusalem through all the land, to announce that the godless heresy of the Christians had made its appearance, and to accuse them of those things which all that are ignorant of us say against us, so that you become the causes not only of your own injustice, but also of all other men's."
He writes also that even down to his time prophetic gifts shone in the Church. And he mentions the Apocalypse of John, saying distinctly that it was the apostle's.
He also refers to certain prophetic declarations, and accuses Trypho on the ground that the Jews had cut them out of the Scripture.
A great many other works of his are still in the hands of many of the brethren. And the discourses of the man were thought so worthy of study even by the ancients, that Irenaeus quotes his words: for instance, in the fourth book of his work Against Heresies, where he writes as follows:
"And Justin well says in his work against Marcion, that he would not have believed the Lord himself if he had preached another God besides the Creator"; and again in the fifth book of the same work he says:
"And Justin well said that before the coming of the Lord Satan never dared to blaspheme God,
because he did not yet know his condemnation." These things I have deemed it necessary to say for the sake of stimulating the studious to peruse his works with diligence. So much concerning him.
|
CHAPTER XIX.
The Rulers of the Churches of Rome and Alexandria during the Reign of Ferns.
In the eighth year of the above-mentioned reign Soter succeeded Anicetus as bishop of the church of Rome, after the latter had held office eleven years in all. But when Celadion
had presided over the church of Alexandria for fourteen years tie was succeeded by
Agrippinus.
|
CHAPTER XX.
The Rulers of the Church of Antioch.
At that time also in the church of Antioch, Theophilus was well known as
the sixth from the apostles. For Cornelius, who succeeded Hero, was the
fourth, and after him Eros, the fifth in order, had held the office of
bishop.
|
CHAPTER XXI.
The Ecclesiastical Writers that flourished in Those Days.
At that time there flourished in the Church Hegesippus, whom we know from
what has gone before, I and Dionysius, bishop of Corinth, and another
bishop, Pinytus of Crete, and besides these, Philip, and Apolinarius, and Melito,
and Musanus, and Modestus, and finally, Irenaeus. From them has come down to us in writing, the sound and orthodox faith
received from apostolic tradition..
|
CHAPTER XXII.
Hegesippus and the Events which he mentions.
Hegesippus in the five books of
Memoirs which have come down to us has left a most complete record of his
own views. In them he states that on a journey to Rome he met a great many
bishops, and that he received the same doctrine from all. It is fitting to hear
what he says after making some remarks about the epistle of Clement to the
Corinthians. His words are as follows: "And the churchIll of Corinth
continued in the true faith until Primus was bishop in Corinth. I conversed
with them on my way to Rome, and abode with the Corinthians many days, during
which we were mutually refreshed in the true doctrine. And when I had come to
Rome I remained a there until Anicetus, whose deacon was Eleutherus. And Anicetus was succeeded by Soter, and he by Eleutherus. In
every succession, and in every city that is held which is preached by the law
and the prophets and the Lord." The same author also describes the
beginnings of the heresies which arose in his time, in the following words:
"And after James the Just had suffered martyrdom, as the Lord had also on
the same account, Symeon, the son of the Lord's uncle, Clopas, was appointed
the next bishop. All proposed him as second bishop because he was a cousin of
the Lord. "Therefore, they called the Church a virgin, for it was not
yet corrupted by vain discourses. But Thebuthis, because he was not made
bishop, began to corrupt it. He also was sprung from the seven sects among
the people, like Simon, from whom came the Simonians, and Cleobius, from
whom came the Cleobians, and Dositheus, from whom came the Dositheans, and
Gorthaeus, from whom came the Goratheni, and Masbotheus, from whom
came the Masbothaeans. From them sprang the Menandrianists, and Marcionists, and Carpocratians, and Valentinians, and Basilidians, and Saturnilians.
Each introduced privately and separately his own peculiar opinion. From them
came false Christs, false prophets, false apostles, who divided the unity of the
Church by corrupt doctrines uttered against God and against his Christ."
The same writer also records the ancient heresies which arose among the Jews,
in the following words: "There were, moreover, various opinions in the
circumcision, among the children of Israel. The following were those that were
opposed to the tribe of Judah and the Christ: Essenes, Galileans, Hemerobaptists,
Masbothaeans, Samaritans, Sadducees, Pharisees." And he wrote of
many other matters, which we have in part already mentioned, introducing the
accounts in their appropriate places. And from the Syriac Gospel according to
the Hebrews he quotes some passages in the Hebrew tongue, showing that he
was a convert from the Hebrews, and he mentions other matters as taken from
the unwritten tradition of the Jews. And not only he, but also Irenaeus and
the whole company of the ancients, called the Proverbs of Solomon All-virtuous
Wisdom. And when speaking of the books called Apocrypha, he records that
some of them were composed in his day by certain heretics. But let us now pass
on to another.
|
CHAPTER XXIII.
Dionysius, Bishop of Corinth, and the Epistles which he wrote. And first we must speak of
Dionysius, who was appointed bishop of the
church in Corinth, and communicated freely of his inspired labors not only to
his own people, but also to those in foreign lands, and rendered the greatest
service to all in the catholic epistles which he wrote to the churches. Among
these is the one addressed to the Lacedaemonians, containing instruction
in the orthodox faith and an admonition to peace and unity; the one also
addressed to the Athenians, exciting them to faith and to the life prescribed by
the Gospel, which he accuses them of esteeming lightly, as if they had almost
apostatized from the faith since the martyrdom of their ruler Publius, which
had taken place during the persecutions of those days. He mentions Quadratus also, stating that he was appointed their bishop after the martyrdom of Publius,
and testifying that through his zeal they were brought together again and their
faith revived. He records, moreover, that Dionysius the Areopagite, who was
converted to the faith by the apostle Paul, according to the statement in the
Acts of the Apostles, first obtained the episcopate of the church at
Athens. And there is extant another epistle of his addressed to the Nicomedians,
in which he attacks the heresy of Marcion, and stands fast by the canon of the truth. Writing also to the church that is in
Gortyna, together with the
other parishes in Crete, he commends their bishop Philip, because of the
many acts of fortitude which are testified to as performed by the church under
him, and he warns them to be on their guard against the aberrations of the
heretics. And writing to the church that is in Amastris, together with those in
Pontus, he refers to Bacchylides and Elpistus, as having urged him to
write, and he adds explanations of passages of the divine Scriptures, and
mentions their bishop Palmas by name. He gives them much advice also in
regard to marriage and chastity, and commands them to receive those who come
back again after any fall, whether it be delinquency or heresy. Among
these is inserted also another epistle addressed to the Cnosians, in which
he exhorts Pinytus, bishop of the parish, not to lay upon the brethren a
grievous and compulsory burden in regard to chastity, but to have regard to the
weakness of the multitude. Pinytus, replying to this epistle, admires and
commends Dionysius, but exhorts him in turn to impart some time more solid food,
and to feed the people under him, when he wrote again, with more advanced
teaching, that they might not be fed continually on these milky doctrines and
imperceptibly grow old under a training calculated for children. In this epistle
also Pinytus' orthodoxy in the faith and his care for the welfare of those
placed under him, his learning and his comprehension of divine things, are
revealed as in a most perfect image. There is extant also another epistle
written by Dionysius to the Romans, and addressed to Soter, who was
bishop at that time. We cannot do better than to subjoin some passages from this
epistle, in which he commends the practice of the Romans which has been retained
down to the persecution in our own days. His words are as follows: "For
from the beginning it has been your practice to do good to all the brethren
in various ways, and to send contributions to many churches in every city. Thus
relieving the want of the needy, and making provision for the brethren in the
mines by the gifts which you have sent from the beginning, you Romans keep up
the hereditary customs of the Romans, which your blessed bishop Soter has not
only maintained, but also added to, furnishing an abundance of supplies to the
saints,, and encouraging the brethren from abroad with blessed words, as a
loving father his children.'' In this same epistle he makes mention also of Clement's epistle to the Corinthians,
showing that it
had been the custom from the beginning to read it in the church. His words are
as follows: "To-day we have passed the Lord's holy day, in which we have
read your epistle. From it, whenever we read it, we shall always be able to draw
advice, as also from the former epistle, which was written 'to us through
Clement." The same writer also speaks as follows concerning his own
epistles, alleging that they had been mutilated: "As the brethren desired
me to write epistles, I wrote. And these epistles the apostles of the devil have
filled with tares, cutting out some things and adding others. For them a
woe is reserved. It is, therefore, not to be wondered at if some have
attempted to adulterate the Lord's writings also, since they have formed
designs even against writings which are of less accounts." There is
extant, in addition to these, another epistle of Dionysius, written to
Chrysophora a most faithful sister. In it he writes what is suitable, and
imparts to her also the proper spiritual food. So much concerning Dionysius.
|
CHAPTER XXIV.
Theaphilus Bishop of Antioch.
Of Theophilus, whom we have mentioned as bishop of the church of Antioch, three elementary works addressed to Autolycus are extant; also another
writing entitled Against the Heresy of Hermogenes, in which he makes use of
testimonies from the Apocalypse of John, and finally certain other catechetical
books. And as the heretics, no less then than at other times, were like
tares, destroying the pure harvest of apostolic teaching, the pastors of the
churches everywhere hastened to restrain them as wild beasts from the fold of
Christ, at one time by admonitions and exhortations to the brethren, at another
time by contending more openly against them in oral discussions and refutations,
and again by correcting their opinions with most accurate proofs in written
works. And that Theophilus also, with the others, contended against them, is
manifest from a certain discourse of no common merit written by him against
Marcion. This work too, with the others of which we have spoken, has been
preserved to the present day. Maximinus, the seventh from the apostles,
succeeded him as bishop of the church of Antioch.
|
CHAPTER XXV.
Philip and Modestus. Philip who, as we learn from the words of
Dionysius, was bishop of the
parish of Gortyna, likewise wrote a most elaborate work against Marcion, as
did also Irenaeus and Modestus. The last named has exposed the error of the
man more clearly than the rest to the view of all. There are a number of others
also whose works are still presented by a great many of the brethren.
|
CHAPTER XXVI.
Melito and the Circumstances which he records.
In those days also Melito, bishop of the parish in Sardis, and Apolinarius, bishop of Hierapolis, enjoyed great distinction. Each of them
on his own part addressed apologies in behalf of the faith to the
above-mentioned emperor of the Romans who was reigning at that time. The
following works of these writers have come to our knowledge. Of Melito, the two
books On the Passover, and one On the Conduct of Life and the Prophets, the
discourse On the Church, and one On the Lord's Day, still further one On
the Faith of Man, and one On his Creation, another also On the
Obedience of Faith, and one On the Senses; besides these the work On the
Soul and Body, and that On Baptism, and the one On Truth, and On
the Creation and Generation of Christ; his discourse also On Prophecy, and that On Hospitality;
still further, The Key, and the books On the
Devil and the Apocalypse of John, and the work On the Corporeality of God, and finally the book ad dressed to
Antoninus. In the books On the
Passover he indicates the time at which he wrote, beginning with these words:
"While Servilius Paulus was proconsul of Asia, at the time when Sagaris
suffered martyrdom, there arose in Laodicea a great strife concerning the
Passover, which fell according to rule in those days; and these were
written." And Clement of Alexandria refers to this work in his own
discourse On the Passover, which, he says, he wrote on occasion of Melito's
work. But in his book addressed to the emperor he records that the following
events happened to us under him: "For, what never before happened, the
race of the pious is now suffering persecution, being driven about in Asia by
new decrees. For the shameless informers and coveters of the property of others,
taking occasion from the decrees, openly carry on robbery night and day,
despoiling those who are guilty of no wrong." And a little further on he
says: "If these things are done by thy command, well and good. For a just
ruler will never take unjust measures; and we indeed gladly accept the honor of
such a death. But this request alone we present to thee, that thou wouldst
thyself first examine the authors of such strife, and justly judge whether they
be worthy of death and punishment, or of safety and quiet. But if, on the other
hand, this counsel and this new decree, which is not fit to be executed even
against barbarian enemies, be not from thee, much more do we beseech thee not to
leave us exposed to such lawless plundering by the populace."
Again he adds the following: "For our philosophy formerly flourished among the Barbarians; but having sprung up among
the nations under thy rule, during the great reign of thy ancestor Augustus, it
became to thine empire especially a blessing of auspicious omen. For from that
time the power of the Romans has grown in greatness and splendor. To this power
thou hast succeeded, as the desired possessor, and such shalt thou continue
with thy son, if thou guardest the philosophy which grew up with the empire and
which came into existence with Augustus; that philosophy which thy ancestors
also honored along with the other religions. And a most convincing proof that
our doctrine flourished for the good of an empire happily begun, is this--that
there has no evil happened since Augustus' reign, but that, on the contrary, all
things have been splendid and glorious, in accordance with the prayers of all.
Nero and Domitian, alone, persuaded by certain calumniators, have wished to
slander our doctrine, and from them it has come to pass that the falsehood has been handed down, in consequence of an unreasonable practice which prevails
of bringing slanderous accusations against the Christians. But thy pious
fathers corrected their ignorance, having frequently rebuked in writing many who dared to attempt new measures against them. Among them thy grandfather
Adrian appears to have written to many others, and also to Fundanus, the
proconsul and governor of Asia. And thy father, when thou also wast ruling with
him, wrote to the cities, forbidding them to take any new measures against us;
among the rest to the Larissaeans, to the Thessalonians, to the Athenians, and to all the Greeks.
And as for thee,--since thy opinions respecting the Christian are the same as theirs, and indeed much more benevolent and
philosophic,--we are the more persuaded that thou wilt do all that we ask of
thee." These words are found in the above-mentioned work.
But in the Extracts made by him the same writer gives at the beginning
of the introduction a catalogue of the acknowledged books of the Old Testament,
which it is necessary to quote at this point. He writes as follows: "Melito
to his brother Onesimus, greeting: Since thou hast often, in thy zeal for
the word, expressed a wish to have extracts made from the Law and the Prophets
concerning the Savior and concerning our entire faith, and hast also desired to
have an accurate statement of the ancient book, as regards their number and
their order, I have endeavored to perform the task, knowing thy zeal for the
faith, and thy desire to gain information in regard to the word, and knowing
that thou, in thy yearning after God, esteemest these things above all else,
struggling to attain eternal salvation. Accordingly when I went East and came
to the place where these things were preached and done, I learned accurately the
books of the Old Testament, and send them to thee as written below. Their names
are as follows: Of Moses, five books: Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus, Deuteronomy; Jesus Nave, Judges, Ruth; of Kings, four books; of Chronicles, two;
the Psalms of David, the Proverbs of Solomon, Wisdom also, Ecclesiastes, Song off Songs, Job; of Prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah; of the twelve
prophets, one book; Daniel, Ezekiel, Esdras. From which also I have
made the extracts, dividing them into six books." Such are the words of
Melito.
|
CHAPTER XXVII.
Apolinarius, Bishop of the Church of Hierapolis.
A number of works of Apolinarius have been preserved by many, and the
following have reached us: the Discourse addressed to the above-mentioned
emperor, five books Against the Greeks, On Truth, a first and second
book, and those which he subsequently wrote against the heresy of the
Phrygians, which not long afterwards came out with its innovations, but
at that time was, as it were, in its incipiency, since Montanus, with his false
prophetesses, was then laying the foundations of his error.
|
CHAPTER XXVIII.
Musanus and his
Writings.
And as for Musanus, whom we have mention among the foregoing writers, a
certain very elegant discourse is extant, which was written by him against some
brethren that had gone over to the heresy of the so-called Encratites, which
had recently sprung up, and which introduced a strange and pernicious error. It
is said that Tatian was the author of this false doctrine.
|
CHAPTER XXIX.
The Heresy of Tatian. He is the one whose words we quoted a little above in regard to that
admirable man, Justin, and whom we stated to have been a disciple of the martyr.
Irenaeus declares this in the first book of his work Against Heresies, where he
writes as follows concerning both him and his heresy: "Those who are
called Encratites, and who sprung from Saturninus and Marcion, preached
celibacy, setting aside the original arrangement of God and tacitly censuring
him who made male and female for the propagation of the human race. They
introduced also abstinence from the things called by them animate, thus
showing ingratitude to the God who made all things. And they deny the salvation
of the first man? But this has been only recently discovered by them, a
certain Tatian being the first to introduce this blasphemy. He was a hearer of
Justin, and expressed no such opinion while he was with him, but after the
martyrdom of the latter he left the Church, and becoming exalted with the
thought of being a teacher, and puffed up with the idea that he was superior to
others, he established a peculiar type of doctrine of his own, inventing certain
invisible aeons like the followers of Valentinus, while, like Marcion and
Saturninus, he pronounced marriage to be corruption and fornication. His
argument against the salvation of Adam, however, he devised for himself."
Irenaeus at that time wrote thus. But a little later a certain man named Severus
put new strength into the aforesaid heresy, and thus brought it about that
those who took their origin from it were called, after him, Severians. They,
indeed, use the Law and Prophets and Gospels, but interpret in their own way the
utterances of the Sacred Scriptures. And they abuse Paul the apostle and reject
his epistles, and do not accept even the Acts of the Apostles. But their
original founder, Tatian, formed a certain combination and collection of the
Gospels, I know not how, to which he gave the title Diatessaron, and
which is still in the l hands of some. But they say that he ventured to
paraphrase certain words of the apostle, in order to improve their style.
He has left a great many writings. Of these the one most in use among many
persons is his celebrated Address to the Greeks, which also appears to be
the best and most useful of all his works. In it he deals with the most ancient
times, and shows that Moses and the Hebrew prophets were older than all the
celebrated men among the Greeks. So much in regard to these men.
|
CHAPTER XXX.
Bardesanes the Syrian and his Extant Works.
In the same reign, as heresies were abounding in the region between the
rivers, a certain Bardesanes, a most able man and a most skillful
disputant in the Syriac tongue, having composed dialogues against Marcion's
followers and against certain others who were authors of various opinions,
committed them to writing in his own language, together with many other works.
His pupils, of whom he had very many (for he was a powerful defender of the
faith), translated these productions from the Syriac into Greek. Among them
there is also his most able dialogue On Fate, addressed to Antoninus, and
other works which they say he wrote on occasion of the persecution which arose
at that time. He indeed was at first a follower of Valentinus, but
afterward, having rejected his teaching and having refuted most of his fictions,
he fancied that he had come over to the more correct opinion. Nevertheless he
did not entirely wash off the filth of the old heresy. About this time also
Soter, bishop of the church of Rome, departed this life.
|
|
|