SAMUEL'S VISION.
1Sa 3:1-21.
IT is evident that Samuel must have taken very kindly to the duties
of the sanctuary. He was manifestly one of those who are sanctified
from in- fancy, and whose hearts go from the first with sacred
duties. There were no wayward impulses to subdue, no hankerings
after worldly freedom and worldly enjoyment; there was no necessity
for coercive measures, either to restrain him from outbursts of
frivolity or to compel him to diligence and regularity in his
calling. From the first he looked with solemn awe and holy interest
on all that related to the worship of God; that, to him, was the
duty above all other duties, the privilege above all other
privileges. God to him was not a mere idea, an abstraction,
representing merely the dogmas and services of religion. God was a
reality, a personality, a Being who dealt very closely with men, and
with whom they were called to deal very closely too. We can easily
conceive how desirous little Samuel would be to know something of
the meaning of the services at Shiloh; how scrupulous to perform
every duty, how regular and real in his prayers, and how full of
reverence and affection for God. He would go about all his duties
with a grave, sweet, earnest face, conscious of their importance and
solemnity; always thinking more of them than of anything else, -
thinking perhaps of the service of the angels in heaven, and trying
to serve God as they served Him, to do God's will on earth as it was
done in heaven.
At the opening of this chapter he seems to be the confidential
servant of the high priest, sleeping near to him, and in the habit
of receiving directions from him. He must be more than a child now,
otherwise he would not be entrusted, as he was, with the opening of
the doors of the house of the Lord.
The evil example of Hophni and Phinehas, so far from corrupting him,
seems to have made him more resolute the other way. It was horrid
and disgusting; and as gross drunkenness on the part of a father
sometimes sets the children the more against it, so the profligacy
of the young priests would make Samuel more vigilant in every matter
of duty. That Eli bore as he did with the conduct of his sons must
have been a great perplexity to him, and a great sorrow; but it did
not become one at his time of life to argue the question with the
aged high priest. This conduct of Eli's did not in any respect
diminish the respectful bearing of Samuel towards him, or his
readiness to comply with his every wish. For Eli was God's high
priest; and in engaging to be God's servant in the tabernacle Samuel
knew well that he took the high priest as his earthly master.
1. The first thing that engages our special attention in this
chapter is the singular way in which Samuel was called to receive
God's message in the temple.
The word of God was rare in those days; there was no open vision, or
rather no vision that came abroad, that was promulgated to the
nation as the expression of God's will. From the tone in which this
is referred to, it was evidently looked on as a want, as placing the
nation in a less desirable position than in days when God was
constantly communicating His will. Now, however, God is to come into
closer contact with the people, and for this purpose He is to employ
a new instrument as the medium of His messages. For God is never at
a loss for suitable instruments - they are always ready when
peculiar work has to be done. In the selection of the boy Samuel as
his prophet there is something painful, but likewise something very
interesting. It is painful to find the old high priest passed over;
his venerable years and venerable office would naturally have
pointed to him; but in spite of many good qualities, in one point he
is grossly unfaithful, and the very purpose of the vision now to be
made is to declare the outcome of his faithlessness. But it is
interesting to find that already the child of Hannah is marked out
for this distinguished service. Even in his case there is
opportunity for verifying the rule, "Them that honour Me I will
honour." His entire devotion to God's service, so beautiful in one
of such tender years, is the sign of a character well adapted to
become the medium of God's habitual communications with His people.
Young though he is, his very youth in one sense will prove an
advantage. It will show that what he speaks is not the mere fruit of
his own thinking, but is the message of God. It will show that the
spiritual power that goes forth with his words is not his own native
force, but the force of the Holy Spirit dwelling in him. It will
thus be made apparent to all that God has not forsaken His people,
corrupt and lamentably wicked though the young priests are.
Both Eli and Samuel sleep within the precincts of the tabernacle.
Not, however, in the sanctuary itself, but in one of those buildings
that opened into its courts, which were erected for the
accommodation of the priests and Levites. Eli's sight was failing
him, and perhaps the care of the lamp as well as the door was
entrusted to Samuel. The lamp was to burn always (Exo 27:20), that
is, it was to be trimmed and lighted every morning and evening (Exo
30:7-8); and to attend to this was primarily the high priest's duty.
The lamp had doubtless been duly trimmed, and it would probably
continue burning through a good part of the night. It was not yet
out when a voice fell on the ears of Samuel, loud enough to rouse
him from the profound slumber into which he had probably fallen.
Thinking it was Eli's, he ran to his side; but Eli had not called
him. Again the voice sounded, again Samuel springs to his feet and
hastens to the high priest; again he is sent back with the same
assurance. A third time the voice calls; a third time the willing
and dutiful Samuel flies to Eli's side, but this time he is sent
back with a different answer. Hitherto Samuel had not known the Lord
- that is, he had not been cognizant of His way of communicating
with men in a supernatural form - and it had never occurred to him
that such a thing could happen in his case. But Eli knew that such
communications were made at times by God, and, remembering the visit
of the man of God to himself, he may have surmised that this was
another such occasion. The voice evidently was no natural voice; so
Samuel is told to lie down once more, to take the attitude of simple
receptiveness, and humbly invite God to utter His message.
There are some lesser traits of Samuel's character in this part of
the transaction which ought not to be passed over without remark.
The readiness with which he springs from his bed time after time,
and the meekness and patience with which he asks Eli for his orders,
without a word of complaint on his apparently unreasonable conduct,
make it very clear that Samuel had learned to subdue two things - to
subdue his body and to subdue his temper. It is not an easy thing
for a young person in the midst of a deep sleep to spring to his
feet time after time. In such circumstances the body is very apt to
overcome the mind. But Samuel's mind overcame the body. The body was
the servant, not the master. What an admirable lesson Samuel had
already learned! Few parts of early education are so important as to
learn to keep the body in subjection. To resist bodily cravings,
whether greater or smaller, which unfit one for duty; temptations to
drink, or smoke, or dawdle, or lie in bed, or waste time when one
ought to be up and doing; to be always ready for one's work,
punctual, methodical, purpose-like, save only when sickness
intervenes, - denotes a very admirable discipline for a young
person, and is a sure token of success in life. Not less admirable
is that control over the temper which Samuel had evidently acquired.
To be treated by Eli as he supposed that he had been, was highly
provoking. Why drag him out of bed at that time of night at all? Why
drag him over the cold stones in the chill darkness, and why
tantalize him first by denying that he called him and then by
calling him again? As far as appears, Samuel's temper was in no
degree ruffed by the treatment he appeared to be receiving from Eli;
he felt that he was a servant, and Eli was his master, and it was
his part to obey his master, however unreasonable his treatment
might be.
2. We proceed now to the message itself, and Samuel's reception of
it. It is substantially a repetition of what God had already
communicated to Eli by the man of God a few years before; only it is
more peremptory, and the bearing of it is more fixed and rigid. When
God denounced His judgment on Eli's house by the prophet, he seems
to have intended to give them an opportunity to repent. If Eli had
bestirred himself then, and banished the young men from Shiloh, and
if his sons in their affliction and humiliation had repented of
their wickedness, the threatened doom might have been averted. So at
least we are led to believe by this second message having been
superadded to the first. Now the opportunity of repentance has
passed away. God's words are very explicit - ''I have sworn unto the
house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli's house shall not be purged
with sacrifice nor offering forever." After the previous warning,
Eli seems to have gone on lamenting but not chastising. Hophni and
Phinehas seem to have gone on sinning as before, and heedless of the
scandal they were causing. In announcing to Samuel the coming
catastrophe, God shows Himself thoroughly alive to the magnitude of
the punishment He is to inflict, and the calamity that is to happen.
It is such that the ears of every one that heareth it shall tingle.
God shows also that, painful though it is, it has been deliberately
determined, and no relenting will occur when once the terrible
retribution begins. "In that day will I perform against Eli all that
I have spoken concerning his house; when I begin I will also make an
end." But terrible though the punishment will be, there is only too
good cause for it. "For I have told him that I will judge his house
for ever, for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made
themselves vile, and he restrained them not." There are some good
parents whose sons have made themselves vile, and they would fain
have restrained them but their efforts to restrain have been in
vain. The fault of Eli was, that he might have restrained them and
he did not restrain them. In those times fathers had more authority
over their families than is given them now. The head of the house
was counted responsible for the house, because it was only by his
neglecting the power he had that his family could become openly
wicked. It was only by Eli neglecting the power he had that his sons
could have become so vile. Where his sons were heirs to such sacred
functions there was a double call to restrain them, and that call he
neglected. He neglected it at the time when he might have done it,
and that time could never be recalled.
So, there is an age when children may be restrained, and if that age
is allowed to pass the power of restraining them goes along with it.
There are faults in this matter on the part of many parents, on the
right hand and on the left. Many err by not restraining at all.
Mothers begin while their children are yet infants to humor their
every whim, and cannot bear to hold back from them anything they may
wish. It is this habit that is liable to have such a terrible
reaction. There are other parents that while they restrain do not
restrain wisely. They punish, but they do not punish in love. They
are angry because their children have broken their rules; they
punish in anger, and the punishment falls merely as the blow of a
stronger person on a weaker. It does not humble, it does not soften.
What awful consequences it often brings!
What skeletons it lodges in many a house! God has designed the
family to be the nurse of what is best and purest in human life, and
when this design is crossed then the family institution, which was
designed to bring the purest joy, breeds the darkest misery. And
this is one of the forms of retribution on wickedness which we see
carried out in their fullness in the present life! How strange, that
men should be in any doubt as to God carrying out the retribution of
wickedness to the bitter end! How singular they should disbelieve in
a hell! The end of many a career is written in these words: - "Thine
own wickedness shall correct thee, and thy backslidings shall
reprove thee; know therefore, and see that it is an evil thing and
bitter that thou hast forsaken the Lord thy God, and that My fear is
. not in thee, saith the Lord God of hosts."
3. And now we go on to the meeting of Eli and Samuel. Samuel is in
no haste to communicate to Eli the painful message he has received.
He has not been required to do it, and he lies till the morning,
awake we may believe, but staggered and dismayed. As usual he goes
to open the doors of God's house. And then it is that Eli calls him.
"What is the thing that He hath said unto thee?" he asks. He adjures
Samuel to tell him all. And Samuel does tell him all. And Eli
listens in silence, and when it is over he says, with meek
resignation, "It is the Lord; let Him do what seemeth Him good."
We are touched by this behaviour of Eli. First we are touched by his
bearing toward Samuel. He knows that God has conferred an honour on
Samuel which He has not bestowed on him, but young though Samuel is
he feels no jealousy, he betrays no sign of wounded pride. It is not
easy for God's servants to bear being passed over in favour of
others, in favour of younger men. A feeling of mortification is apt
to steal on them, accompanied with some bitterness toward the object
of God's preference. This venerable old man shows nothing of that
feeling. He is not too proud to ask Samuel for a full account of
God's message. He will not have him leave anything out, out of
regard to his feelings. He must know the whole, however painful it
may be. He has learned to reverence God's truth, and he cannot bear
the idea of not knowing all. And Samuel, who did not wish to tell
him anything, is now constrained to tell him the whole. ''He told
him every whit, and hid nothing from him." He did not shun to
declare to him the whole counsel of God. Admirable example for all
God's servants! How averse some men are to hear the truth! And how
prone are we to try to soften what is disagreeable in our message to
sinners - to take off the sharp edge, and sheathe it in generalities
and possibilities. It is no real kindness. The kindest thing we can
do is to declare God's doom on sin, and to assure men that any hopes
they may cherish of His relenting to do as He has said are vain
hopes - ''When I begin," says God, "I will also make an end."
And we are touched further by Eli's resignation to God's will. The
words of Samuel must have raised a deep agony in his spirit when he
thought of the doom of his sons. Feeble though he was, there might
have arisen in his heart a gust of fierce rebellion against that
doom. But nothing of the kind took place. Eli was memorable for the
passive virtues. He could bear much, though he could dare little. He
could submit, but he could not fight. We find him here meekly
recognizing the Divine will. God has a right to do what He will with
His own; and who am I that I should cry out against Him? He is the
Supreme Disposer of all events; why should a worm like me stand in
His way? He submits implicitly to God. "The thing formed must not
say to Him that formed him, Why hast Thou formed me thus"? What God
ordains must be right. It is a terrible blow to Eli, but he may
understand the bearings of it better in another state. He bows to
that Supreme Will which he has learned to trust and to honour above
every force in the universe.
Yes, we are touched by Eli's meekness and submission. And yet,
though Eli had in him the stuff that martyrs are often made of, his
character was essentially feeble, and his influence was not
wholesome. He wanted that resolute purpose which men like Daniel
possessed. His will was too feeble to control his life. He was too
apprehensive of immediate trouble, of present inconvenience and
unpleasantness, to carry out firm principles of action against
wickedness, even in his own family. He was a memorable instance of
the soundness of the principle afterwards laid down by St. Paul: "If
a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of
the Church of God?" He greatly needed the exhortation which God gave
to Joshua - "Be strong and of a good courage." It is true his
infirmity was one of natural temperament. Men might say he could not
help it. Neither can one overcome temperament altogether. But men of
feeble temperament, especially when set over others, have great need
to watch it, and ask God to strengthen them where they are weak.
Divine grace has a wonderful power to make up the defects of nature.
Timid, irresolute Peter was a different man after his fall.
Divine grace turned him into a rock after all. The coward who had
shrunk from before a maiden got courage to defy a whole Sanhedrim.
In the ministers of God's house the timid, crouching spirit is
specially unseemly. They, at least, would need to rest on firm
convictions, and to be governed by a resolute will. "Finally,
brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put
on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the
evil day, and having done all, to stand."
4. Samuel is now openly known to be the prophet of the Lord. "Samuel
grew, and the Lord was with him, and did let none of his words fall
to the ground." Little didst thou think, Hannah, some twenty years
ago, that the child thou didst then ask of the Lore would ere long
supersede the high priest who showed so little tact and judgment in
interpreting the agitation of thy spirit! No, thou hast no feeling
against the venerable old man; but thou canst not but wonder at the
ups and downs of Providence; thou canst not but recall the words of
thine own song, "He bringeth low, and lifteth up." And Samuel has
not to fight his way to public recognition, or wait long till it
come. "All Israel, from Dan even .to Beersheba, knew that Samuel was
established to be a prophet of the Lord."
And by-and-bye other oracles came to him, by which all men might
have known that he was the recognized channel of communication
between God and the people. We shall see in our next chapter into
what trouble the nation was brought by disregarding his prophetic
office, and recklessly determining to drag the ark of God into the
battlefield. Meanwhile we cannot but remark what a dangerous
position, in a mere human point of view, Samuel now occupied. The
danger was that which a young man encounters when suddenly or early
raised to the possession of high spiritual power. Samuel, though
little more than a boy, was now virtually the chief man in Israel.
Set so high, his natural danger was great. But God, who placed him
there, sustained in him the spirit of humble dependence. After all
he was but God's servant. Humble obedience was still his duty. And
in this higher sphere his career was but a continuation of what had
been described when it was said, "The child Samuel ministered to the
Lord in Shiloh."
|