Edited By Alvah Hovey, D.D., LL.D.
BODY AND SOUL. ORIGINAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BODY AND THE SOUL, THE FORMER BEING MADE CORRUPTIBLE, THE LATTER INCORRUPTIBLE, — HENCE, AN ORIGINAL DIFFERENCE OF RELATION TO ENDLESS EXISTENCE, THE FORMER BEING, AND THE LATTER NOT BEING, ADAPTED TO THE SAME. — THIS ADAPTATION MADE MANIFEST BY THE PROPERTIES OF THE SOUL,
DEATH AND LIFE. NATURE OF DEATH, THE PENALTY OF SIN, AS INDICATED (1) BY THE NARRATIVE IN GENESIS; (2) BY THE USE OF THE TERM DEATH IN THE NEW TESTAMENT; AND (3) BY THE USE OF ITS OPPOSITE, THE TERM LIFE,
THE INTERMEDIATE STATE. PROOF OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE INTERMEDIATE STATE — (1) FROM THE WORDS OF CHRIST; (2) FROM THE WORDS OF PETER; (3) FROM THE WORDS OF PAUL; (4) FROM THE "WORDS OF CHRIST. — OBJECTIONS TO THIS — (1) FROM SCRIPTURE; AND (2) FROM REASON.
THE FINAL STATE. EXTRACTS FROM JOSEPHUS AND TACITUS. — TESTIMONY OF CHRIST AFTER HIS ASCENSION. — HIS TESTIMONY WHILE YET ON EARTH. — REPLY TO ANOTHER INTERPRETATION OF HIS LANGUAGE.
BIBLICAL OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED. (1) "DEATH," THE EXTINCTION OF CONSCIOUS BEING. — THEORY OF HAM. — THEORY OF HUDSON. — (2) " DESTRUCTION," THE EXTINCTION OF CONSCIOUS BEING. — SUPPORTS OF THIS VIEW. — OBJECTIONS TO IT.
FURTHER OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED. (1) THE DEAD PRONOUNCED UNCONSCIOUS BY OLD TESTAMENT WRITERS. — REPLY TO THIS STATEMENT. — (2) THE LANGUAGE OF THE APOSTOLICAL FATHERS AND EARLY APOLOGISTS CONFIRMATORY OF THE PRECEDING OBJECTIONS. — THIS ASSUMPTION SHOWN TO BE INCORRECT. RATIONAL OBJECTIONS. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. — OBJECTIONS (1) FROM THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOD. — REPLY. — (2) FROM THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD. — REPLY. — (3) FROM THE BENEVOLENCE OF GOD. — REPLY. — CONCLUSION.
|
|
|