By Johann Peter Lange
Edited by Rev. Marcus Dods
THE LIFE OF THE LORD JESUS UNFOLDED IN ITS FULNESS,
ACCORDING TO THE VARIOUS REPRESENTATIONS OF THE FOUR EVANGELISTS.
SECTION I. GENERAL VIEW AND DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS. Whilst the Gospel of Mark represents the life of Christ as a self-originated, underived, divine power, casting down all opposing forces, building up all the shattered powers of man, and thus accomplishing redemption; we find in the Gospel of Luke the life of Jesus apprehended and described in all its relations to humanity — especially to human nature in its moral aspects. These relations form a special side of Christianity, above all, of the life of Christ, the Son of man. It is an essential law in the vocation of man to exhibit a life free yet conditioned, or conditioned yet free, in the divine freedom of an absolutely limited being; that is, in pure, holy humanity (see above, vol. iii. p. 486); hence especially in the virtues of humanity — in compassion, mercy, the healing of the sick, the recovery of the wretched. And in this respect also, did Christ recognize and embody in perfect beauty the end of human life, misunderstood and obscured by man himself. He, the Son of man, revealed the august majesty of God in the tender, gracious forms of perfected humanity. His life is thus infinitely rich in most expressive and manifold traces of His God-revealing humanity (see above, vol. iii. p. 488). The Evangelist Luke was commissioned to describe the life of Jesus from this special point of view. He was a Gentile Christian, and a helper of Paul, the great apostle of the Gentiles; and as such had had occasion to fix his thoughts on the inalienable relationships between God and the whole human race, as these had been illustrated by the life of Christ, and especially in the great contest of law and grace. To this must be added, that he was an educated Greek; and thus, from his earliest culture, prepared, as well as disposed, to look for and to contemplate the divine in the fair image of humanity. Lastly, he was a physician; and could thus appreciate the task of Him, who being Himself whole, seeks a true representation of God not in formations of brass and marble, but in the recovery and restoration of the noble but diseased material of suffering human life. These historical qualifications, however, would still not have sufficed to fit him for the work of the third Evangelist, had not his personal individuality been in correspondence with them. Everywhere we recognize in him that gracious, humane, courteous character, which, under the guidance and control of the Spirit of God, was altogether suited to depict the life of Christ in the third fundamental form of His glory (see above, vol, i. p. 207). It is in accordance with this character of his Gospel, that it is provided with a literary preface, which bears the marks of humane, specially of scientific culture (chap. i. 1-4); that, in an introductory biographical narrative, it goes back to the earliest commencement of the individual history of Jesus (chap. i. 5-80); that it further gives the most detailed account of His birth in the historical circumstances which attended it, and in its relation to the history of the world — as, for example, in the several particulars of His first entrance into life (stable and manger). His circumcision, and His dedication in the temple; and that it tells how already this birth enriches the poor, and renews the youth of age, and spreads far around a new light of hope (chap. ii. 1-40). The same feature is observable in the suggestive fact, which it communicates from the middle of the youthful history of Jesus (chap. ii. 41-52). Quite in the same manner of representation, the commencement of the public life of Jesus is determined chronologically, and according to the political circumstances of the time, w^ith great exactness. The Evangelist then shows us the threefold attestation given to Christ on undertaking His ministry. The first is the theocratic, through the instrumentality of John the Baptist; the second is the voice from heaven; the third lies in His human genealogy, which goes back to Adam in his true humanity and formation after the image of God, and through him to God Himself (chap, iii.) With this threefold attestation from without, corresponds the confirmation given by Christ Himself in His victory over the tempter in the wilderness (chap. iv. 1-13). The history then unfolds itself from the point of view of a holy residence on earth — a holy pilgrimage in accordance with His character as the Son of man. The first station, so to speak, from which Jesus takes His departure, is His native town, Nazareth (chap. iv. 14-30). The second station of His pilgrimage is Capernaum, where He fixes His residence, with a view to make this the centre of His evangelistic journeyings throughout Galilee (chap. iv. 31-44). On the occasion of the first journey undertaken from Capernaum, the preparation for His departure is prominently put forward; after which, a compendious exhibition of the Gospel is presented, first in acts, and then in words (v. 1-vi. 49). On this follows the first return of Jesus to Capernaum, and the expansion of the Gospel horizon by the healing of the servant of a Gentile centurion (vii. 1-10). The second journey of Christ introduces us to a series of deeds and teachings, in which the Gospel unfolds itself with ever increasing power (vii. 11-viii. 21). To this succeeds His third journey, which has for its central fact the crossing of the lake, and ends in the mission of the apostles (viii. 22-ix. 6). Thereafter Jesus retires into a desert place, and prepares for His departure to Jerusalem, more especially by the history of His transfiguration (ix. 7-50). Accordingly His departure now takes place, and the frustration of His proposed journey through Samaria has for its result the sending forth of the seventy disciples (ix. 51-x. 37). The Evangelist then imparts to us various single incidents in the journey of Jesus from Galilee to Jerusalem. Without regard to chronological order, these particulars arrange themselves, according to their matter, into a picture of the journey of believers into the kingdom of God, or into a representation of the doctrine of salvation in facts (x. 38xviii. 30). The end of the journey is the progress of Jesus towards Jerusalem, and His public entry into the city (xviii. 31-xix, 48). Its immediate result is His contest with the Sanhedrim in the temple (xx. 1-xxi. 4). This is followed by the announcement of the destruction of the temple, the last judgment, and the end of the world (xxi. 5-38). The events preparatory to our Lord's passion contrast somewhat more strongly with the passion itself than in the case of the preceding synoptists (xxii. 1-38). The passion of Jesus (xxii. 39-xxiii. 56). The resurrection of the Lord, viewed especially as a glorifying of His death on the cross according to the Scriptures, and as a revelation of His new life in the risen spiritual body (xxiv.) ───♦─── Notes In the work of Dr A. Eitschl, Das Evangelium Marcions, unci das kanonische Evangelium des Lukas, which, pretty much in the manner of the Tübingen school, proceeds on the hypothesis, that the Gospel of Marcion is not a mutilation of the Gospel according to Luke, but its root, the attempt to delineate the 'pragmatic plan of the Gospel of the original Luke 'is introduced with the remark: 'It is difficult to discover any definite order whatever, chronological or material, in the Gospel' (p. 203). This assertion is certainly confirmed by what follows, in which the author succeeds better in overthrowing the arrangement by Schleiermacher, based on the narrative of the journeys, than in discovering any satisfactory connection for himself. An attempt of a similar kind is found in Ebrard, p. 99. The anonymous author of the book, 'Die Evangelien, ihr Geist, Hire Verfasser, und ihr Verlidltniss zu einander' (Leipzig, Otto Wigand, 1845), has marked the traces of the peculiarities of the Gospels, especially also of Luke, with much acuteness. But the delicate and free physiognomic forms of these peculiarities have, through his singular want of appreciation of the domination of the one Spirit of Christ in the four Gospels, been distorted into malicious, politically refined caricatures. Criticism has here reached that stage in which it seeks to interpret the unconstrained, fine, and beautiful lines of life in the different conceptions of the one object, formed by the several Evangelists, as specimens of the shrewd cunning, the spite and the animosities, which flow from party feeling, and to ascribe, therefore, those peculiar gifts, whose common vital ground is the one Spirit of God, to the spirit of hierarchical and political cabal. The preparation for this newest point of view, which seeks a construction of the Gospels by the imputation of immoral and disreputable motives, was, indeed, already in existence. In reference to the essay by Zeller, 'Ueher den dogmatischen Character des dritten Evangeliums,' in his 'Theol. Jahrbücher,' ii. 1843, com p. Baggesen, Bedenken gegen die Berufung des Herrn Dr C. Zeller, p. 11.
|
|
|