PHYSICAL INFIRMITIES
Both Wesley and Fletcher class infirmities under three heads:
those of the body, of the mind, and of the spirit. Owing to the
complexity in the composition of body, mind and spirit, and the ever
interlacing of the manifestations of their various movements, it is
at times impossible to separate them) and to say with a surety, this
is of the body, this of the mind, and this of the spirit. We will
attempt to separate them only in a general way.
I. Physical Infirmities. There would be very little need of
teaching concerning physical weaknesses were it not for the fact
that it is sometimes a difficult matter for some to understand the
effect that these weaknesses may have on the spirit, and where
legitimate effects end and sinful principles enter. Certain it is,
that, under the present order of things, the Creator has so
amalgamated our entire being that all is interdependent, and one
part is strangely influenced by another.
The physical man has its limitations, and these limitations are
often painfully manifest. We will not be taken to task when we say
that some things are physically impossible. Men can not flap their
arms and fly like birds; they can not swim like fish; their voices
are weak and they can not roar like lions; they can lift only so
much, walk so fast, do so much work; they finally reach a place
where their finiteness arises and says, "Henceforth and no farther."
The strongest man will wear out and must take rest. God has
acknowledged this fact in the alternations of night and day, in
setting apart one day in seven, and in frequent cautions to turn
aside and rest awhile. In our scrap book we have a long poem about
the preacher's vacation in which the writer very strongly
depreciated such a thing as a preacher taking a vacation, since, as
he says, the devil, saloon-keepers and others do not do so. This
might be a good argument, if it was true, and if the physical man
would never wear out, but it does, and in these modern days the fact
is acknowledged that at some time during the year every workman
should have a vacation. But when it comes to the work of the
Lord some people are inclined to go on the principle of the man,
who, when he heard some Christian workers speaking of being tired,
said, "Work on, and die, and go to heaven."
Some have wished and prayed for a stronger physique that they might
do the work their hearts indite. They have looked at some big,
muscular fellows, who do -- nothing much -- and almost envied
them their physical powers. Notwithstanding the peculiar teachings
of some, it still remains a fact that physical and spiritual
strength do not always run parallel, and that though at times the
outward may perish, yet the inward man may be renewed day by day.
Some of God's saints must continually fight against harassing pains,
some against sluggishness of body, some against distressing nerves,
others are overtaken by uncontrollable weakness, and some gradually
break down and fall into the grave. Who will venture to say that in
spite of any or all of these physical ailments the soul will mount
on eagle's wings, and feel exalted to the third heaven? But if even
this soul continues steadfast in the faith, God's favor will not be
withdrawn. Thus we learn that continual ecstatic joys are not
essential to the favor of God. It is the true heart that counts.
While we live in this world we will never be wholly free from
physical desires and appetites. In themselves these desires and
appetites are legitimate and are not a sign of depravity, but when
men fell their natural appetites became depraved, and will never, in
this life, reach such a state that their possessors will not be
forced to deny themselves daily, -- to keep their bodies under. In
other words, while, in the article of holiness, moral depravity is
removed, yet physical depravity remains, and a man must deny his
inordinate appetites, tastes, desires, and preferences to such an
extent as to keep his body under and his soul in the ascendency. Be
careful when your bodily appetites, the lowest part of man, are
getting control, you are in danger of becoming a cast away.
(Note. The words depravity and inordinate, as used
above in connection with the natural appetites, must be properly
qualified, or they will lead to misunderstanding. "Depravity" is
used for want of a better word, and refers, not to sinful depravity,
which can reside only in the spirit, but to the lack of that
perfection which originally characterized the whole man, even his
physical desires. The word "inordinate" as we have here used it does
not refer to that condition in which the physical desires conquer
the whole man, but simply to the fact that, even in the sanctified,
certain desires are so strong that there remains the necessity for
self-denial.)
In a holy man the natural desires may be warped in the direction of
one's own individual besetment; this is not actual sin, but is only
a proof of physical depravity. Although God may, He does not
usually, or it may be ever, so change a man's natural disposition as
to make him entirely unlike his former self, but his former self is
often so sanctified and made meet for the Master's use that it is
scarcely recognizable, and the Lord says that old things are passed
away and all things are become new. One man's natural besetment is
lightness, he must practice sobriety; another's is melancholia, he
must rejoice in the lord; one man is given to too much talk, he must
study to be quiet; another does not talk enough, he must learn to
speak. We knew one man who had an inordinate desire for food; his
efforts at self-control carried him into asceticism. We have heard
of a horse getting scared at the water on one side of a bridge and
jumping off into the water on the other side.
When a person demands any form of recreation, association, food,
pleasure or indulgence to make him happy he is leaving the track of
self-denial and is putting some other thing in the place only God
should occupy. This is one of the strongest arguments against the
use of tobacco, opiates or any form of narcotics or stimulants; they
form a habit which steals one's happiness until gratified, even
common sense is forgotten and God's presence often obscured in the
intense longing for the favorite indulgence. "The passions become
eagle eyed, the judgment blind."
The proper limit of any gratification is one's own good, the good of
others or the glory of God; anything beyond this is allowed;
allowed, not commanded, because of the weakness of the human
instrument. And when we say allowed we do not mean to teach that God
ever winks at self-indulgence, but He can pardon because of the
atonement. The spirit of the sanctified truly is willing, but the
flesh of even this man is weak, and God forgives his unwitting
trespasses because of the blood and judges him by Christ's
evangelical law of liberty. This is what we mean when we pray,
"Forgive us our trespasses ('debts' or 'sins') as we forgive those
who trespass against us." Not actual transgressions or inherent sin
(this latter can not be forgiven,) but inadvertent trespasses
against the infinitely pure law of God which allows of no mistakes,
caused by human shortsightedness and lack of understanding.
"Except a man deny himself," refers to that thing which would be
pleasing to the natural man, but the doing of which would be
unpleasing to God and detrimental to the soul's best good. Except a
man, when occasion arises, put away pleasing food, pleasing
associations, pleasant occupations, the possibility of gain,
desirable position; except he accept, when the occasion arises,
unpleasant things, annoying circumstances, scant supplies, hissing
and scorn, the track of tribulation, he can not be Christ's
disciple. If a man would gain his life, he must consent to lose it.
All this holiness will do for a man even though the flesh is weak.
By this ye shall know whether ye are Christ's disciple, if ye love
him more than these.
Concerning the physical infirmities of Christ and the corresponding
infirmities of the holy, Fletcher writes:
"Was not our lord Himself imperfect? Did His bodily strength never
fail in agonizing prayer, or in intense labor? Did His animal
spirits ever move with the same sprightliness? Do we not read of His
sleeping in the ship when His disciples wrestled with the
tempestuous sea? Did He not fulfill the precept, 'Be ye angry, and
sin not'? Had He not the troublesome sensation of grief at Lazarus'
grave, of hunger in the wilderness, of weariness, at Jacob's well,
and of thirst, upon the cross.? If He was 'made in the likeness of
sinful flesh,' and 'tempted in all things as we are,' is it not
highly probable that He was not an utter stranger to the natural
appetites and uneasy sensations which are incident to flesh and
blood? Is it a sin to feel them? Is it not rather a virtue totally
to deny them, or not to satisfy them out of the line of duty, or not
to indulge them in an excessive manner on that line? Again: Did not
His holy flesh testify a natural, innocent abhorrence to suffering?
Did not His sacred flesh faint in the garden? Were not His spirits
so depressed that He stood in need of the strengthening assistance
of an angel? Did He do all the good He would? To suppose that He
wished not the conversion of His friends and brethren is to suppose
Him totally devoid of natural affection: but were they all
converted? Did you ever read, 'Neither did His brethren believe in
Him,' and, 'His friends went out to lay hold on Him; for they said,
He is beside Himself?' To conclude: Did He not accidentally stir up
the evil He would not when He gave occasion to the envy of the
Pharisees, scorn of Herod, the fears of Pilate, the rage of the
Jewish mob? And when He prayed that the bitter cup might pass from
Him, if it were possible, did He not manifest a resigned desire to
escape pain and shame? If every such desire is indwelling sin, or
the flesh sinfully lusting against the spirit, Did He not go through
the sinful conflict as well as those whom we call perfect men in
Christ, and consequently, did He not fall at once from mediatorial,
Adamic, and Christian perfection; indwelling sin being equally
inconsistent with all these perfections? What true believer does not
shudder at the bare supposition? And if our sinless lord felt the
weakness of the flesh harmlessly lusting against the willingness of
the spirit, according to His own doctrine, 'The spirit indeed is
willing, but the flesh is weak,' is it not evident that the conflict
we speak of, -- if the spirit maintains its superior, victorious
lusting against the flesh, and by that means steadily keeps the
flesh in its proper place -- is it not evident, I say, that this
conflict is no more inconsistent with Christian perfection than the
suffering, agonizing, fainting, crying, and dying, which were the
lot of our sinless, perfect Savior to the last?" -- Last Check to
Antinomianism, Sec. VII.
|