AS GOOD AS GOD.
It is objected that those who profess holiness claim to be as
good as God.
This statement is as false as it could possibly be. Professors of
holiness never make such a claim; on the contrary they constantly
assert that they are not and never will be divine nor as good as
divinity. This is proven from the following considerations
I. The nature of God himself.
- God is goodness. He has in himself independent of any other
being the fountain of never failing goodness. No man ever makes
such a claim for himself, but all holiness people constantly
declare that any goodness in them is given by God.
- God is love. This is his nature and ever will be. He is the
very personification of love. Every professor of holiness
declares "I love because he first loved me."
- God is perfect. That is, in him every moral attribute is so
complete that there is no possibility of adding any perfection
to his character either in kind or degree. Holiness people
continually bewail their littleness and are always seeking
greater attainments.
- God is perfect in knowledge, wisdom, power and glory.
Nothing ever will add to him or detract from him; we can never
teach him or hide anything from him. The eyes of the Lord run to
and fro through all the earth beholding the evil and the good.
Professors of holiness are like other men, they lack knowledge,
are liable to be unwise, are weak and are even called the filth
of the world.
II. Holiness people not only do not claim to be as good as God
but they assert that there are other beings that excel them in
holiness and that there are laws that they cannot fulfill.
1. They do not claim to keep the angelic law of perfect obedience
the Adamic or Mosaic laws of perfect innocence.
The prejudices of our opponents are increased by their
confounding Adamic and Christian perfection; two perfections
these, which are as distinct as the garden of Eden and the
Christian church. Adamic perfection came from God our Creator in
paradise, before any trial of Adam's faithful obedience: and
Christian perfection comes from God our Redeemer and Sanctifier
in the Christian church, after a severe trial of the obedience
of faith. Adamic perfection might be lost by doing despite to
the preserving love of God our Creator; and Christian perfection
may be lost by doing despite to the redeeming love of God our
Saviour. Adamic perfection extended to the whole man; his body
was perfectly sound in all its parts, and his soul in all its
powers, but Christian perfection extends chiefly to the will,
which is the capital moral power of the soul; leaving the
understanding ignorant of ten thousand things, and the body
"dead because of sin." *
2. They do not claim what some call sinless perfection unless the
word "sinless" is properly defined.
We believe that although adult, established believers, or
perfect Christians, may admit of many involuntary mistakes,
errors, and faults; and of many involuntary improprieties of
speech and behavior; yet, so long as their will be bent upon
doing God's will; so long as they 'fulfil the law of liberty' by
pure love, they do not sin according to the gospel; because,
evangelically speaking, 'sin is the transgression,' and 'love is
the fulfilling,' of 'that law.' Far, then, from thinking that
there is the least absurdity in saying daily, 'Vouchsafe to keep
us this day without sin,' we doubt not but in the believers who
'walk in the light as Christ is in the light,' that deep
petition is answered, the righteousness of the law which they
are under is fulfilled; and, of consequence, an evangelically
sinless perfection is daily experienced. I say, evangelically
sinless,' because, without the word 'evangelically,' the phrase
'sinless perfection' gives an occasion of caviling to those who
seek it; as Mr. Wesley intimates in the following quotation,
which is taken from his Plain Account of Christian Perfection:--
"To explain myself a little farther on this head: 1. Not only
'sin,' properly so called, that is, a voluntary transgression of
a known law, but 'sin,' improperly so called, that is, an
involuntary transgression of a divine law, known or unknown,
needs the atoning blood. 2. I believe there is no such
perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary
transgressions, which I apprehend to be naturally consequent on
the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality. 3.
Therefore, 'sinless perfection' is a phrase I never use, lest I
should seem to contradict myself. 4. I believe a person filled
with the love of God is still liable to these involuntary
transgressions -- such transgressions you may call 'sins,' if
you please; I do not, for the reasons above-mentioned.
**
3. Persons who profess holiness do not claim to have attained
such a measure of grace and of the fullness of the Spirit that they
cannot grow in grace.
Another capital mistake lies at the root of the opposition
which our Calvinian brethren make against Christian perfection.
They imagine that, upon our principles, the grace of an adult
Christian is like the body of an adult man, which can grow no
more. But this consequence flows from their fancy, and not from
our doctrine. We exhort the strongest believers to 'grow up into
Christ in all things;' asserting that there is no holiness, and
no happiness in heaven, much less upon earth, which do not admit
of a growth, except the holiness and the happiness of God
himself; because, in the very nature of things, a being
absolutely perfect, and in every sense infinite, can never have
anything added to him. But infinite additions can be made to
beings every way finite, such as glorified saints and holy
angels are. ***
III. Holiness people do not lay claim to absolute perfection, for
the following reasons:--
- They are compassed about with infirmities, Their physical
bodies are weak. Sickness and disease prey upon them. Because of
their weakness they are often unable to do the things they
desire.
- Their fleshly natures possess appetites and desires which
must be held in check, mortified or denied or they will become
too strong, or take too prominent a place in the life and
eventually overthrow spirituality. Paul says: "But I keep under
my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means,
when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."
And again, "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the
earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil
concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry."
- Their minds are infirm. Holiness does not teach a man the
measurements of the heavens, the natures and virtues of plants,
the laws of physics nor the intricacies of mathematical
calculations. Holiness does not even insure that its possessor
will be able to pass judgment as to what consequence will follow
any given antecedent without error. That is, they are not
infallible in judgment and do not claim to be.
- Their spirits are infirm. An infirmity is defined as an
involuntary lack of power. All are free to admit that they would
be glad to be able to sense God's will and requirements more
readily than they do. Their spiritual eyes are open but they do
not always see all things clearly. Although growth in grace
assures clearer vision yet perfect vision will never be given
till they enter heaven.
IV. In what particular then do they claim to be perfect?
- They do claim that their hearts are cleansed from the
inbeing of sin.
- They do claim that their motives are pure. When they know
the will of God they desire to do it.
- They claim to be made perfect in love. This is a Bible term
and is the name of a Christian experience. Perfect love means
love with no admixture of any contrary affection. If there is
any admixture the love is not perfect.
- They do claim to be perfect according to the law of liberty
by which they shall be judged, "So speak ye, and so do, as they
that shall be judged by the law of liberty." -- James 2:12. This
law admits that human infirmities may exist even after the heart
is cleansed from sin.
In view of all these acknowledgments of weakness and infirmity no
one can truthfully accuse another of claiming divine prerogatives
simply because he professes entire sanctification.
|