Verse 1
Joshua 19:1. The second lot came
forth to Simeon — God disposed
it so by an especial providence,
Simeon being the eldest son of
Jacob that was unprovided for.
Their inheritance was within the
inheritance of Judah — This also
was ordered by God’s providence,
partly to fulfil that
threatening that he would divide
and scatter this tribe in
Israel, (Genesis 49:7,) which
was hereby done in part, because
they had no distinct lot, but
were as inmates to Judah; partly
because now, upon the more exact
survey of the land, it appeared
that the part given to Judah did
far exceed the proportion which
they needed, or which the other
tribes could expect. And this
was the least of the tribes,
(Numbers 26:14,) and therefore
fittest to be put within another
tribe.
Verse 11
Joshua 19:11. Toward the sea —
The lot of this tribe was washed
by the midland sea on the west,
and by the sea of Tiberias on
the east, answering Jacob’s
prophecy, Zebulun shall be a
haven of ships; trading ships on
the great sea, and fishing ships
on the sea of Galilee. Before
Jokneam — Supposed to be Kishon.
Verse 15
Joshua 19:15. Beth-lehem — Not
that where Christ was born,
which was in Judah, but another.
Twelve cities — They are more
numerous here, but the rest
either were not cities, properly
so called, or were not within
this tribe, but only bordering
upon it, and belonging to other
tribes.
Verse 18
Joshua 19:18. Jezreel — The
royal city, 1 Kings 21:1. This
tribe, because it lay between
Benjamin on the south and
Zebulun on the north, is not
here described by its borders,
which were the same with theirs,
but by some of its cities.
Verse 26
Joshua 19:26. Carmel westward —
Or, Carmel by the sea, to
distinguish it from Carmel in
the tribe of Judah. This was a
place of eminent fruitfulness,
agreeably to the prophecy
concerning Asher, Genesis 49:20.
Verse 27
Joshua 19:27. Cabul — A city so
called. Left hand — That is, on
the north, which, when men look
toward the east, as is usual, is
on their left hand.
Verse 28
Joshua 19:28. Kanah — Namely,
Kanah the greater, in the Upper
Galilee; not Kanah the less,
which was in the Lower Galilee.
Zidon — Called great for its
antiquity, and riches, and
glory. The city either was not
given to the Israelites, or at
least was never possessed by
them; not without a singular
providence of God, that they
might not by the opportunity of
so good a port be engaged in
much commerce with other
nations; from which, together
with wealth, that great
corrupter of mankind, they might
contract their errors and vices.
Verse 29-30
Joshua 19:29-30. To Ramah — From
the north southward. To the
strong city of Tyre — This
translation is questionable; for
we never read one word of the
city of Tyre (unless it be here)
until the days of David; though
we often read of Sidon in the
books of Moses; even in the
prophecy of Jacob. It is highly
probable some other place is
meant by Tzor, as the word is in
the Hebrew. And the out-goings
thereof, &c. — That is, it ended
at the country which belonged to
Achzib; for so hebel, which we
here translate coast, signifies.
Twenty-two cities — Here are
more named, but some of them
were not within this tribe, but
only bordering places.
Verse 32-33
Joshua 19:32-33. The sixth lot
came out, &c. — Here the younger
son of Bilhah, the hand-maid of
Rachel, is preferred before the
elder, who was Dan, (Genesis
30:6; Genesis 30:8,) as Zebulun
was before Issachar. Such was
the method of Divine Providence
in that nation, to convince them
that they ought not to value
themselves too highly, as they
were apt to do, upon their
external privileges. Their coast
— Their northern border, drawn
from west to east, as appears;
because, when the coast is
described and brought to its
end, it is said to turn from the
east westward, Joshua 19:34. The
out- goings — The end of that
coast.
Verse 34-35
Joshua 19:34-35. And to Judah
upon Jordan — It was not near
Judah, there being several
tribes between them. Therefore
the meaning is, this tribe had a
communication with that of
Judah, by means of the river
Jordan. So the word upon, in our
translation, ought to be
interpreted. This river afforded
them the convenience of carrying
merchandises to Judah, or
bringing them from thence. And
thus, some think, the prophecy
of Moses was accomplished,
(Deuteronomy 33:23.) Possess
thou the west and the south;
which doth not signify that they
had any land in the south; but
that they trafficked with that
country by the means of Jordan.
Chinnereth — Whence the lake of
Cinnereth, or Genesareth,
received its name. Geneser
signifies the gardens of
princes; and here were fine
gardens, and a kind of paradise.
The Jews say the name Cinnereth
was taken from its fruits, which
were as sweet to the taste as
the cinnor, or harp, to the ear.
Verse 47
Joshua 19:47. The coast of Dan
went out too little — The words
too little are not in the
Hebrew, where there is nothing
that corresponds with them. The
passage runs thus: The coast of
the children of Dan went out
from them; that is, they were
dispossessed of it in some
parts, or kept out of them by
the former inhabitants; and we
find, by 1:34, that the Amorites
forced them into the mountains,
and would not suffer them to
dwell in the valley. This
reduced them to such straits,
that they were constrained to
enlarge their border some other
way; which they did as follows.
They went up to fight against
Leshem — A city not far from
Jordan, called Laish in the book
of Judges, before it was taken
by the Danites. And called
Leshem, Dan, after the name of
Dan their father — It was
customary for conquerors to
change the names of those places
they subdued. This was done with
respect to Leshem, after the
death of Joshua; and is related
more largely in the book of
Judges, chap. 18., where the
whole expedition is recorded.
From whence some have argued
that this book was not written
by Joshua; whereas no more can
fairly be inferred, than that,
in after times, Ezra, or some
other, thought good to insert
this verse here, in order to
complete the account of the
Danites’ possessions.
Verse 49
Joshua 19:49. When they had made
an end of dividing the land —
That is, after every tribe had
had their respective portion
assigned to them. The children
of Israel gave an inheritance to
Joshua — We cannot but admire
the wonderful modesty of this
great man, who received his
portion last of all, and then,
not by lot, but by their gift,
who were already possessed of
the whole land.
Verse 50
Joshua 19:50. According to the
word of the Lord, they gave him
the city which he asked — God
indeed had ordered that he
should have a portion, and that
he himself should choose it; but
he was content to stay for it
till every one else was amply
provided for. We do not
expressly read of this command;
but many particulars were said
and done which are not recorded.
And Joshua being as faithful and
upright as Caleb, and chosen
besides to be the captain of
God’s people, we cannot but
think, that when God ordered
what Caleb should have, he gave
the same direction with respect
to Joshua: see Joshua 16:6. Even
Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim —
Joshua did not choose the best
place in all the country, but a
convenient one in his own tribe;
which was seated on the north
side of a hill called Gaash, as
we read in the latter end of
this book. And he built the city
and dwelt therein — Repaired it,
we suppose, (for in all
probability there was a city in
that situation before,) and made
a convenient habitation for his
family and relations. But we
read nothing of them afterward;
for as he did not affect to make
himself king of Canaan, so he
contented himself with a
moderate allotment, and made no
large provision for his
posterity.
Verse 51
Joshua 19:51. These are the
inheritances, &c. — Upon the
whole of this division of the
land, it deserves our remarking,
that the lot fell to the several
tribes just as Jacob and Moses
had foretold. And this division
served to keep up the
distinction of tribes, which was
to continue till the coming of
the Messiah. And we may observe
further, that God had expressly
named, some years before, as we
find by Numbers 34:17-29, the
very persons who should divide
the land unto the children of
Israel, and expressly described
the bounds how far every way the
land reached which was to be
divided by them. |