Verse 1
Leviticus 18:1. It being one
special design of God to
preserve his people from the
lewd and idolatrous customs of
other nations, Moses now
receives particular orders to
prohibit the Israelites from
many of those unnatural
practices which were common
among the ancient idolaters.
Verse 2
Leviticus 18:2. Your God — Your
sovereign and lawgiver. This is
often repeated, because the
things here forbidden were
practised and allowed by the
Gentiles, to whose custom he
opposes divine authority and
their obligation to obey his
commands.
Verse 3
Leviticus 18:3. Egypt and Canaan
— These two nations he mentions,
because their habitation and
conversation among them made
their evil example in the
following matters more
dangerous. But under them he
includes all other nations.
Verse 4
Leviticus 18:4. My judgments —
Though you do not see the
particular reason of some of
them, and though they be
contrary to the laws and usages
of the other nations.
Verse 5
Leviticus 18:5. He shall live in
them — Not only happily here,
but eternally hereafter. This is
added as a powerful argument why
they should follow God’s
commands rather than men’s
examples, because their life and
happiness depended upon it. And
though in strictness, and
according to the covenant of
works, they could not challenge
life for so doing, except their
obedience was universal,
perfect, constant, and
perpetual, and therefore no man
since the fall could be
justified by the law; yet by the
covenant of grace this life is
promised to all that obey God’s
commands sincerely. I am the
Lord — Hebrew, I am Jehovah;
that is, I am faithful to keep
my covenant, and to fulfil my
promises. See on Exodus 6:3. I
am the sovereign dispenser of
life and death, and therefore
they that keep my laws shall
live.
Verse 6
Leviticus 18:6. The first of
these prohibitions is against
all improper and incestuous
marriages, a thing very common
among the Canaanitish nations
and in Egypt, even to the last
degree of unnatural mixtures.
Diodorus Siculus relates, that
it was permitted by law in the
latter country, contrary to the
custom of other nations, that a
man might marry his own sister.
None of you shall approach — The
prohibition is absolute, and no
advances were to be made toward
its violation. Indeed the only
way to avoid actual
transgressions, is to resist and
guard against the first motions
of evil. Principiis obsta,
withstand the first approach of
sin, is a most important
precept. And it is to be well
observed, that as these laws
forbade marriages between near
relations, they certainly much
more prohibited unchastity
between them, and every approach
to it. Any that is near akin to
him — Hebrew, The remainder of
his flesh; that is, his
immediate relations, so near
akin to him, that they are, as
we say, his own flesh and blood;
such as a man’s sister, mother,
daughter. Indeed, had near
relations been allowed to marry
each other, the most mischievous
and fatal consequences must have
resulted from it. For being much
together in youth, temptations
to unchastity would frequently
have been too powerful to have
been resisted. But, by such a
restriction as this, being
taught to look upon all such
intercourse as prohibited and
incestuous, they were assisted
to withstand temptations to
evil.
Verse 7
Leviticus 18:7. The nakedness of
thy father, or of thy mother —
This is but one fact, though
expressed two ways, as appears
from Leviticus 18:8, compared
with Leviticus 20:11. The
expression imports, that such an
action is doing the greatest
dishonour to one’s father and
mother.
Verse 9
Leviticus 18:9. Whether she be
born at home, or born abroad —
Whether she be legitimately born
in wedlock, or illegitimately
out of wedlock. Others explain
it thus: “Whether she be thy
sister by the same father, or by
another marriage.”
Verse 14
Leviticus 18:14. Thy father’s
brother — Thou shalt not marry
thy uncle’s wife, as is
explained in the next words.
Verse 16
Leviticus 18:16. Thy brother’s
wife — Unless he died childless,
for in that case God afterward
commanded that a man should
marry his brother’s widow,
Deuteronomy 25:5. For the
prohibiting of marriages in the
more remote degrees of
consanguinity, where other moral
considerations are less obvious,
there is this good reason to be
assigned, namely, that marriage
being one of the firmest bonds
of friendship, it is proper, for
the greater good of society,
that men should seek to enlarge
the ties of friendship and
social affection, by uniting,
not with those to whom they were
before related, but with persons
of different families.
Verse 17
Leviticus 18:17. A woman and her
daughter — If a man married a
widow that had a daughter, he
was not allowed to marry this
daughter, either while the
mother was alive or after her
death.
Verse 18
Leviticus 18:18. A wife to her
sister — The meaning seems to
be, that no man should take to
wife two sisters, which had
sometimes been done, as we see
in the example of Jacob. It may,
however, signify that a man, who
already had a wife, was not to
take another out of mere
incontinency, which would tend
only to break his wife’s peace;
but that if he took that liberty
at all, it ought only to be when
his wife consented to it, as
Sarah did in the case of
Abraham’s marrying Hagar, and
Rachel in the case of Bilhah. To
vex her — Grotius justly
observes, that as the feuds and
animosities of brothers are, of
all others, the most keen; so
are generally the jealousies and
emulations between sisters,
whereof we have an example in
the history of Rachel and Leah.
Verse 19
Leviticus 18:19. As long as she
is set apart — No, not to thy
own wife. This was not only a
ceremonial pollution, but an
immorality also, whence it is
put among gross sins, Ezekiel
18:6. And therefore it is now
unlawful under the gospel.
Verse 21
Leviticus 18:21. Pass through
the fire to Molech — In the
Hebrew it is only pass through
to Molech. But though the word
fire be not in the original, it
is reasonably supplied from
other places, where it is
expressed, as Deuteronomy 18:10;
2 Kings 23:10. Molech, called
also Milcom, was the idol of the
Ammonites. The name signifies
king, or regal dominion, and is
thought to denote the sun, the
supreme, and probably the first
object of idolatrous worship.
Or, as others, the planet
Saturn; for it appears from Amos
5:26, that Molech represented
one of the celestial luminaries.
Now, as fire is a fit emblem of
the sun, the causing their seed
to pass through the fire is
thought to have been a rite of
purification whereby parents
consecrated their children to
that deity, either by waving
them over the fire, or by making
them walk between two fires, or
jump over a fire. This is the
opinion of many able
interpreters. But Selden, who
has given a large account of
this idol, and of the rites with
which it was worshipped, shows,
from several testimonies, that
the Phœnicians, and other
nations in the neighbourhood of
Judea, actually sacrificed their
children, in times of great
calamity, to this blood-thirsty
demon. Accordingly this phrase
of causing them to pass through
the fire, signifies sacrificing
them in the following horrid
manner, Ezekiel 16:20-21. Fagius
informs us, that the image of
Molech was of brass, contrived
with seven cells or receptacles,
probably representing the seven
planets, the first for receiving
an offering of flour; the second
of turtle-doves; the third for a
ewe; the fourth for a ram; the
fifth for a calf; the sixth for
an ox; the seventh for a child.
who, being shut up in this cell,
as in a furnace, was therein
burned to death, while the
people danced about the idol,
and beat timbrels, that the
cries of the tormented infant
might not be heard. We have
authority from the sacred
writings to believe that these
nations actually sacrificed
their children to that grim
idol, in some such horrid
manner. Compare 2 Chronicles
28:3, and Jeremiah 7:31, with
Jeremiah 32:35; Jeremiah 19:5;
Psalms 106:37-38, and Ezekiel
16:20-21. In all which places,
to pass through the fire,
signifies the consuming of the
victim by fire. And Le Clerc
ingeniously conjectures, that
this phrase, passing through to
Molech, was invented by the
impious priests, in order to
convey a softer idea of that
horrid rite. We may further
observe, that there was a place
near Jerusalem, where this
horrid custom was observed. It
was called the valley of the
sons of Hinnom, (2 Chronicles
28:3,) from the yelling of the
sacrificed infants. And for the
same reason it had the name of
Tophet, (2 Kings 23:10,) from
Toph, a tabret or drum, with
which they used to drown the
dreadful outcries of the unhappy
victims. Neither shalt thou
profane the name of thy God —
This idolatry in the Israelites
would be the foulest and most
profane renunciation of the true
GOD, to whom they and their
posterity were solemnly devoted,
and at the same time it would
give occasion to strangers to
blaspheme the name of Jehovah,
as if he authorized such
barbarities in his worshippers.
Verse 26
Leviticus 18:26. Nor any
stranger — In nation or
religion, of what kind soever.
For though they might not force
them to submit to their
religion, yet they might
restrain them from the public
contempt of the Jewish laws, and
from the violation of natural
laws, which, besides the offence
against God and nature, were
matters of evil example to the
Israelites themselves.
Verse 29
Leviticus 18:29. Cut off — This
phrase therefore, of cutting
off, is to be understood
variously, either of
ecclesiastical or civil
punishment, according to the
differing natures of the
offences for which it was
inflicted. |