Problems and Previous Interpretations
Experience in Wesley's theology: Increasing attention now paid
to the theoretical element in Wesley. His theology has been called a
theology of experience. In this he both supersedes and conforms to
the spirit of the Enlightenment. Bett and Workman represent the
subjectivist interpretation of Wesley. Revision of this in Cell,
Lee, Frost, and Schmidt.
Wesley's theological outlook: Early general expositions by
Schneckenburger, Loofs, and McGiffert. Two interpretations: one
Reformed, the other Arminian Anglican. The latter found in Leger,
Piette, Rattenbury, Petri, Lee, Knox, and Impeta. The former in Cell
(though Cell also gives prominence to the Arminian element), von
Eicken, Scott, Schmidt, Lerch, and Lang. A third interpretation:
Methodism the source of the so-called sanctification movements in
Protestantism.
Wesley and sanctification: Defects in previous interpretations;
difficult to place sanctification in correct perspective. The
conception is usually undervalued. The internal context inadequately
elucidated.
The present work: A systematic-theological study of
sanctification. Primary sources.
SANCTIFICATION AND THE NATURE OF MAN
I.
The State of Natural Man Determined by Original Sin
The collective view of sin: Wesley's conception of man helps us
to understand his attitude to salvation. His conception of sin up to
1738. Wesley's clearer conception of sin accompanied by new insight
into justification by faith. This conception grounded on the
doctrine of original sin, which also becomes the basis of his
doctrine of justification. The condition of natural man: totally
corrupt through sin and consequent guilt. The primaeval state and
the fall of man. Original sin and Adam's sin. The meaning of
original sin: loss of primitive perfection and total corruption of
human nature; a subjective-psychological and an objective-judicial
view; original sin as inherent corruption and as guilt. The doctrine
of original sin emphasizes the idea of grace.
The individualistic view of sin: Stress laid on personal
awareness of original sin. Original sin brings guilt, but this is
imputed and not personal; the punishment is different. The
individualistic view reconciled with the collective. Wesley's
individualism the result of his Arminian view of election. The
possibility of real choice.
II.
Original Sin and Specific Sins. Personal Sin
The
relation between original and specific sins. The personal sins:
inward and outward; the process of sin. Wesley's empiricism led him
to attend particularly to personal sin.
III. The Conceptions of Sin and Salvation
The objective-judicial aspect: Sin is guilt just as salvation is
forgiveness. (Justification in Wesley's conception of salvation).
The subjective-medical aspect: Sin is disease just as salvation
is restoration of the soul to health. (Sanctification in Wesley's
conception of salvation).
IV. Prevenient Grace and Salvation
Something in man has survived the Fall but this does not make
salvation easier. The doctrine of prevenient grace acquires
increasing importance under the influence of Arminianism. Some
knowledge of God in everyone through prevenient grace, which is
primarily a manifestation of conscience. It is supernatural. Wesley
reconciles the doctrines of original sin and prevenient grace; the
results of doing so.
V.
The Conception of Man in the Twenty-five Articles of 1784
The
doctrine of original sin in the Twenty-nine Articles and in Wesley's
abridgement. Wesley's views on this matter. The Article on free
will.
ATONEMENT, JUSTIFICATION, SANCTIFICATION
I.
Atonement
The breach with Law in 1738: The importance of atonement in
Wesley. Law's view of salvation and atonement. Wesley's view of
atonement and the effect of that view on the relation between
justification and sanctification. The implications of Wesley's
breach with Law and the mystics.
Atonement in the Thirty-nine Articles and The Homily of Salvation:
The idea of satisfaction can already be detected in the Articles.
The same idea in The Homily of Salvation. Its presumption in the
conception of God.
Wesley's view of atonement: Determined by the orthodox doctrine
of satisfaction in the earliest Evangelical sermons; and
subsequently. This is also seen in another controversy with Law. The
difference in the conception of atonement due to a difference in the
conception of God. Wesley diverges from Zinzendorf as well. Side by
side with the conception of justice in his doctrine of satisfaction
we find the conception of grace in his doctrine of atonement. The
notion of the Atonement as a work of liberation and conquest is
present but ancillary. Instead Wesley associates the idea of
conquest with the work of Christ in man: the New Birth and
sanctification. Wesley, however, also diverges from the orthodox
view: satisfaction does not imply the active obedience of Christ in
the orthodox sense. Thus the imputation of Christ's righteousness is
not a factor in justification; and thus the fulfillment of the law
is linked up with sanctification and not with atonement and
justification.
II. The Law
The
law is not regarded as an evil power overcome by Christ in the
Atonement. This law, the moral law, is an emanation of the Divine
Essence. The characteristics of the law: holiness, justice, and
goodness. The meaning of the Christian's freedom from the law. The
three uses of the law. The third use of the law: its place in the
Christian life.
III. Justification and Sanctification
The relation between atonement, justification, and sanctification:
The relation of the two latter to the former. Definition of
justification and sanctification: a relative change and a real
change. The relation between justification and sanctification in the
doctrine of justification by faith: the Reformed attitude. There is
nevertheless a difference as compared with Luther and a doctrine of
justification determined by the idea of predestination. The latter
particularly evident in the idea of repentance before faith. A
synergistic tendency due to Wesley's Arminianism.
The importance of sanctification in Wesley's view of salvation:
The relative change in justification is given logical priority, but
the stress is laid on the real change in the New Birth and
sanctification. A teleological tendency in the view of salvation.
The emphasizing of the real change a result of Wesley's hostility to
Antinomianism. Faith regarded as the means and fulfillment of the
law as the end. The importance of sanctification also appears in his
definition of the nature of religion and Methodism.
SANCTIFICATION AND THE ORDER OF SALVATION
I.
General Survey of the Order of Salvation
The
order of salvation takes the form of a process in which the gradual
and instantaneous elements coalesce. The various meanings of
salvation. The place of baptism in the order of salvation. The order
of salvation in Wesley's first Evangelical period. The order of
salvation subsequently.
II. The Stages
The
effects of prevenient grace. Repentance before justification and the
fruits of this repentance. Justification and the New Birth.
Repentance after justification and the fruits of this repentance.
Christian perfection. Final justification or final salvation and
glorification. Modifications and alterations.
III. The Process of Salvation and Sanctification
A
gradual development characteristic of Wesley's mode of thought. This
is combined with the instantaneous approach, by which salvation is
seen as an ascent by steps. This ascent by steps was the principle
on which Wesley organized the Methodist societies. The means of
grace and sanctification. The various meanings of sanctification and
its place in the order of salvation. Sanctification is both gradual
and instantaneous. The relation of sanctification to justification
is dual: it must be determined with respect to both present and
final justification. The consequences of this.
CHRISTIAN PERFECTION
I.
The Importance and General Significance of the Idea of Perfection
This idea a typical expression of Wesley's teleological view of
salvation. Various terms designating perfection. The influence of
practical mysticism and the liturgical tradition of the Church of
England. Agreement with practical mysticism as represented by Thomas
ā Kempis, Jeremy Taylor, and William Law. And differences. Compared
to the Reformation and Zinzendorf. Some further general features of
Christian perfection and modifications.
II. Christian Perfection in Greater Detail
The
difference between entire sanctification and new birth. Deliverance
from original sin. Perfection not absolute: it is adapted to the
present circumstances of man. The law subjected to adaptation. Sin
similarly treated. But as well as the relative concept of perfection
which determines the doctrine there is also a concept of absolute
perfection and a corresponding concept of law and sin. The relation
between entire sanctification and atonement. Tabulation.
III. Further Characteristics
Assurance of entire sanctification. Perfection and humility. Inward
and outward holiness. Perfection becomes a perfecting of the
personality.
CHRISTIAN LOVE
I.
The Idea of Love in William Law
Present aims. Law's view of religion determined by the idea that
through holiness man shall be qualified for eternal life. The nature
of this holiness. This view reflected in his attitude to love.
Neighbourly love is determined by the idea of imitation. This love
is universal. It is a love of benevolence. Self-love as a legitimate
form of Christian love. Legality and rationality in the idea of love
and the whole conception of religion. Love to God the most proper
form of man's love. Summary.
II. The Idea of Love in Wesley: General Characteristics
Wesley shares Law's teleological leaning; the consequences for his
conception of salvation and his idea of love. The difference between
them lies in Wesley's stressing of the causal view. The causal view
linked up primarily with saving faith in atonement. But since
salvation is seen as a process the causal approach is subordinate to
the teleological. Love closely bound up with the idea of law.
Rationality in the idea of law. Order and harmony in religion, and
love becomes ordered love.
III. Love in Relation to its Objects
Love to God: A causal and Reformed view. Another alignment in
keeping with Law and mysticism seen in the opposition between
frui and uti and in the teleological approach. The
teleological view persists but after 1738 is modified by a new point
of departure; still, however, two main forms of love are compared:
love to the Creator and love to the creature. The nature of these
two kinds of love. Purity of intention as an expression of man's
proper attitude to God. His fundamental teleology makes love to God
dominate in the idea of love.
Neighbourly love: This love is given greater emphasis in 1738
but love to God is still the main principle. The motives of
neighbourly love: love to God, imitation of God, the idea of the
Creation. The nature and scope of this love: as in Law it is a
universal benevolence. Graduation and regulation: three concentric
circles. His ecumenical outlook.
Self-love: This idea employed to underline the importance of
brotherly love. Considered a legitimate form of Christian love; the
relation between neighbourly love and self-love. Ultimately
self-love and neighbourly love are expressions of love to God.
SANCTIFICATION AND FINAL SALVATION
I.
Final Salvation as a Work of God
The
dual relation between justification and sanctification the result of
a twofold view of salvation: present and final salvation; this
expressed in the two main themes in Wesley's teaching, 'Salvation by
faith alone, and 'Without holiness no man shall see the Lord'. These
merge in saving faith: continuing in faith the condition of final
salvation. The faith active in love is meant. Entire sanctification,
the condition of final salvation, a promise which God will fulfil.
This view expressed in the sermon entitled Satan's Devices (1750).
Final salvation, organically connected with present salvation,
evangelically presented.
II. Final Salvation and the Works of Man
Continuance in faith also dependent on the Christian himself; the
importance of works in upholding and developing the Christian life.
Works issuing from faith necessary to final salvation. The holiness
necessary to final salvation is a condition but not a merit.
Fletcher's interpretation of Wesley's position. The organic
connection between present and final justification in Fletcher.
Reasons for emphasizing works: Wesley's antagonism to Antinomianism.
This antagonism an outcome of his Arminian view of election and of
his doctrine of prevenient grace. A synergistic feature.
III. Sanctification and Twofold Salvation
Wesley's causal and teleological outlooks manifested in his twofold
view of salvation. Tensions involved in the idea of a twofold
justification. The idea of sanctification dominates his view of
salvation since salvation is seen as a process directed to the
ultimate goal of the Christian life, final salvation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|