Verse 1
2 Samuel 8:1. David smote the
Philistines, and subdued them —
In the beginning of his reign
they had invaded Israel twice,
and were successfully repulsed.
But now David invaded their
country, made a conquest of it,
and brought it under subjection
to the Israelites. David took
Metheg-ammah — That is, Gath and
her towns, as it is expressed in
the parallel place, 1 Chronicles
18:1, which are called
Metheg-ammah, or the bridle of
Ammah, because Gath was situate
in the mountain of Ammah; and
because this being the chief
city of the Philistines, and
having a king, which none of the
rest had, was the bridle which
had hitherto kept the Israelites
in subjection.
Verse 2
2 Samuel 8:2. He smote Moab —
For although the king of Moab,
out of hatred to Saul, gave
protection to David’s parents, 1
Samuel 22:3-4; yet the Moabites
were perpetual and sworn enemies
to the Israelites, who therefore
were forbidden to admit them
into the congregation of the
Lord. God indeed commanded the
Israelites, in their march to
Canaan, to spare the Moabites
for the sake of their progenitor
Lot, but afterward they became
such fierce enemies to him and
his people, that he was provoked
to treat them in a different
manner. Now was fulfilled the
prophecy of Balaam, Numbers
24:17-18. “A sceptre shall rise
out of Israel, and shall smite
the corners,” or princes, “of
Moab.” See the note on that
passage. And measured them with
a line — That is, having
conquered the country, he took
an exact survey, and made an
estimate of it, distributing the
towns and people into three
parts. Casting them down to the
ground — Destroying the
fortified cities and strong
holds of the whole land, and
levelling them with the ground,
as far as he thought necessary
to humble them and secure
himself. With two lines measured
he to put to death, and with one
full line to keep alive — This
passage, it must be
acknowledged, is extremely
obscure. But the most probable
sense of it seems to be, that
upon the taking and demolishing
of those forts and strong holds,
which made an obstinate
resistance, he discriminated
between those who were hardy and
determined in refusing all
offers of mercy, made upon their
submission, and those who were
unwillingly withheld by their
rulers and commanders from
accepting the mercy offered
them; preserving the latter
alive, and putting the others to
death. “Agreeable to this
sense,” says Dr. Delaney, “the
Hebrew text may, and I think
ought, to be understood thus:
With two lines measured he,
namely, one to put to death
those obstinate few who rejected
all offers of mercy; and with
one full line (in the original,
one line of plenitude) to keep
alive; that is, to save all
those who would have submitted
and accepted proffered mercy,
had they been suffered. David
was a prophet, and thoroughly
versed in the Scriptures; and
when he had there learned that a
king was to arise out of Jacob
who should one day smite and
subdue Moab, it was not hard for
him to discern, in the spirit of
prophecy, that he himself was
that king, especially after the
message delivered to him by
Nathan, from the word of the
Lord. And there is no doubt but
he executed the sentence
denounced against Moab, in the
prophecy of Baalam, in that
sense in which the Spirit of God
denounced it, which I apprehend
to be that now explained. But,
supposing David destroyed
two-thirds of the Moabites on
this occasion, and saved only
one- third, (for so some
understand the text,) the
severity of this chastisement
was no greater than that which
God himself denounces against
his own people for their sins,
Zechariah 13:8. And why might
not the sins of the Moabites
deserve this chastisement now,
as those of the Jews did at the
time referred to in this
prophecy? The greatest sins the
Jews ever committed against God
were those corruptions which
they copied from their neighbour
nations, the most abominable of
all which were practised by the
very nation we are now speaking
of; and therefore there is good
reason to believe that they now
deserved the same severity of
vengeance from the justice of
God, which he afterward
inflicted upon his own people.”
And so the Moabites became
David’s servants — Were made
subject to him; and brought
gifts — Or paid a constant
tribute, which they continued to
do all his days, and in the
reign of Solomon. And after the
kingdom was divided, it was paid
to the kings of Israel, till
after the death of Ahab, when
they refused to pay it, 2 Kings
3:4-5.
Verse 3
2 Samuel 8:3. King of Zobah —
Zobah was a part of Syria, whose
eastern border was Euphrates, as
the western was the land of
Canaan, and the kingdom of
Damascus. As he went to recover
his border — That is, as David
went to extend the limits of his
kingdom toward the river
Euphrates, he smote this king,
who probably came out to oppose
him. David remembered the grant
which God had made to his people
of all the land, as far as that
river; and, having subdued his
neighbouring enemies, went to
recover his rights, according to
the divine promise and gift.
Verse 4
2 Samuel 8:4. David took from
him a thousand chariots — The
word chariot is not in the
Hebrew, but is well supplied by
our translators from 1
Chronicles 18:4, in which book
many things are explained which
are briefly related here; seven
hundred horsemen — Or rather,
seven hundred companies of
horsemen, that is, in all, seven
thousand, as it is 1 Chronicles
18:4, there being ten in each
company, and each ten having a
ruler or captain. David houghed
all the chariot-horses — That
is, cut the sinews of their
legs, or their hamstrings, that
they might be of no use in war;
but reserved of them for a
hundred chariots — Probably, as
a monument of his victory, not
for war; God having forbid them
to multiply horses, Deuteronomy
17:16.
Verse 5-6
2 Samuel 8:5-6. The Syrians of
Damascus — That is, that were
subject to Damascus, the chief
city of Syria. Put garrisons in
Syria of Damascus — Hebrew, in
Aram Damasek. This was that part
of Syria which lay between
Libanus and Antilibanus. The
Syrians brought gifts — By way
of tribute, in token of their
subjection. The Lord preserved
David whithersoever he went —
Kept him from all the dangers to
which he was exposed in these
wars.
Verse 7
2 Samuel 8:7. The shields of
gold that were on the servants
of Hadadezer — It hath been the
practice of many princes to make
the arms of their soldiers
ornamental and precious, partly
from the love of splendour and
magnificence, and partly to
influence the courage of those,
that carried them: since nothing
else could secure them from
becoming a property and a prey
to the enemy. Some think,
however, the meaning here is,
Which were with the servants;
that is, committed to their
custody, as being kept in the
king’s armory; for it is not
probable, they think, that they
carried shields of gold into the
field.
Verse 8
2 Samuel 8:8. From Betah, &c. —
In 1 Chronicles 18:8, it is,
from Tibhath, and from Chun.
Either therefore the same cities
were called by several names, as
is usual, the one by the
Hebrews, the other by the
Syrians; or those were two other
cities, and so the brass was
taken out of these four cities.
Verses 9-11
2 Samuel 8:9-11. King of Hamath
— This city was also in Syria,
and lay north of Judea. To
salute him, and bless him — To
congratulate him on his good
success in the war with
Hadadezer, and to wish him
continued prosperity. Joram
brought with him vessels, &c. —
As a present to King David,
whose friendship he sought by
this embassy. Which David did
dedicate to the Lord — These
words seem to import, that he
was so far from multiplying
silver and gold for himself,
(which Moses forbade,
Deuteronomy 17:16,) that he put
all his spoil, or the greatest
part of it, into God’s treasury,
for the building of the temple,
which he designed, and his son
was to accomplish, chap. 2
Samuel 7:13. A rare instance of
his piety and gratitude to God,
by whose aid he conquered; too
seldom imitated by kings!
Verse 14
2 Samuel 8:14. Throughout all
Edom put he garrisons — Having
conquered the whole country, he
garrisoned the strongest places
in it with his own men, to keep
them in subjection to him. Some
of the Jews interpret these
words, He put captains, or
commanders, in Edom, that is,
great men to govern them, and,
as his deputies, to raise a
tribute from them. Now began to
be fulfilled the extraordinary
prediction to Rebekah, recorded
by Moses, Genesis 25:22, but not
begun to be accomplished till
many centuries after his death,
namely, The elder shall serve
the younger. Then also was
fulfilled that prophecy of
Balaam, mentioned Numbers 24.,
Edom shall be a possession, &c.
The Lord preserved David, &c. —
God, in his providence, still
watched over and protected him,
as before, (2 Samuel 8:6,) in
all these expeditions. All
David’s victories were typical
of the success of the gospel
over the kingdom of Satan, in
which the Son of David rode
forth, conquering and to
conquer, and will reign till he
has brought down all opposing
rule, principality, and power.
Verse 15
2 Samuel 8:15. David reigned
over all Israel — He has no
disturbance at home, while he
was engaged in wars abroad: but
all Israel obeyed him. And David
executed judgment and justice —
That is, either, 1st, Having now
finished his foreign wars, he
applied himself to the civil
government of his people,
according to the law of God,
which he executed duly by
himself, or his judges: or,
rather, 2d, Even while he was
engaged in so many wars abroad,
he did not neglect his people at
home; but took care that justice
should be administered to them,
according to that divine
admonition recorded in his last
words, 2 Samuel 23:3, He that
ruleth over men must be just,
ruling in the fear of God.
Verse 16
2 Samuel 8:16. Jehoshaphat was
recorder — That is, the
remembrancer, or writer of
chronicles, as is generally
thought; “an employment,” says
Dr. Delaney, “of no mean
estimation in the eastern world,
where it was customary with
kings to keep daily registers of
all the transactions of their
reigns; and a trust which,
whosoever discharged to purpose,
must be let into the true
springs and secrets of action;
and, consequently, must be
received into the utmost
confidence.” Some, however,
rather suppose, that by the
recorder, the treasurer is
intended, who examined all the
accounts, and kept records of
them.
Verse 17
2 Samuel 8:17. Zadok and
Ahimelech were the priests —
That is, as some think, Zadok
was the high-priest, and
Ahimelech his sagan or vicar;
or, according to others, neither
of these was the high-priest,
but they were both only the
vicars of Abiathar, and heads of
the sacerdotal families, the
second priests, to use the
language of Scripture, 2 Kings
25:18. The former was of the
family of Eleazar, (1 Chronicles
6:8,) the other of Ithamar. The
family of Eli was now declining
fast; and in the next reign the
other family was advanced to the
high-priesthood, Abiathar and
his posterity being quite thrown
out. Seraiah was the scribe — Or
secretary of state, as we now
speak. But Bishop Patrick
observes, that as the word
ספרsopher, which we translate
scribe, imports something of
learning, as the word scribe, so
often occurring in the New
Testament, also does, he takes
Seraiah to have been the king’s
prime counsellor in the law. And
others think there were two of
this character, one an
ecclesiastical and the other a
civil scribe. Thus “the sacred
writer no sooner gives us an
account of David’s executing
justice and judgment, but he
immediately adds a list of the
great officers then employed by
him. For a principal part of a
king’s wisdom, as well as of his
felicity, consists in the choice
of able ministers to discharge
the great offices of the state.”
— Delaney.
Verse 18
2 Samuel 8:18. Benaiah, &c. —
Benaiah was one of David’s three
worthies of the second order;
eminent for many great exploits,
of which three only are
recounted by the sacred
historian. Was over both the
Cherethites and the Pelethites —
These were undoubtedly soldiers
of some kind, and even such as
were eminent for their valour
and fidelity to the king, as is
evident from 2 Samuel 15:18; 2
Samuel 20:7; and 1 Kings 1:38; 1
Kings 1:44; yet they were not
common soldiers, but probably
the constant guards of David’s
person; like the Prętorian bands
among the Romans. Josephus calls
them keepers of the body, or
body-guards, who never departed
from the place where the king
was. That Cherethites is
sometimes another word for
Philistines, appears plainly
from Zephaniah 2:5, and Ezekiel
25:16; But, “that David’s guards
were native Philistines, of his
mortal enemies, is not to be
imagined, even although we
should suppose them proselytes.
For how could their being
proselyted more effectually
recommend the fidelity of any
men to him than being natives of
his own country, and known and
tried subjects? The only
question, then, is, why any of
his own subjects should be
called Cherethites; and the
answer is obvious. They were
called so from their having gone
with him into Philistia, and
continued there with him all the
time that he was under the
protection of Achish. These were
they who resorted to him from
the beginning, in his utmost
distress; and clave to him in
all his calamities; and it is no
wonder if men of such approved
fidelity were in a more intimate
degree of favour and confidence
with the king, and enjoyed,
among other privileges, an
exemption from the authority of
the captain-general, and were
placed under peculiar
commanders. And it will be no
uncommon thing in the history of
any country, to find legions and
bands of soldiers, denominated,
not from the place of their
nativity, but that of their
residence; as General Monk’s
troops, who sojourned with him
in Scotland, were called
Coldstreamers.” — Delaney. The
same author apprehends the
Pelethites to have been another
body of troops, made up of those
valiant men who resorted to
David when he resided at Ziklag,
among whom we find one Pelet,
the son of Azmaveth, (1
Chronicles 12:3,) who, it is
supposed, became their captain,
and from whom they were called
Pelethites, as the soldiers
disciplined by Fabius and
Iphicrates were called Fabians
and Iphicratians. “Now, as the
Cherethites adhered to David and
followed his fortune from the
beginning, they justly held the
first degree of favour with him,
and therefore they are always
placed before the Pelethites,
who only resorted to him when he
was in Ziklag; and for that
reason were only entitled to the
second degree of favour.” See 1
Samuel 30:14. It must be
observed, however, that the
Chaldee interpretation of these
terms is, archers and slingers,
an interpretation which is
defended by a learned professor
abroad, deriving the name
Cherethite from Caratha, which,
in the Arabic language,
signifies to hit the mark, and
Pelethite, from pelet, which in
the same language, among other
things, signifies to be alert,
to leap, to run swiftly. The
latter, therefore, he thinks,
were soldiers chosen for their
speed, and were light armed,
like the Roman velites, who,
with their other weapons,
carried very light arrows, which
were called pelles, and the use
of which came from the East. And
David’s sons were chief rulers —
For so the Hebrew word, כהנים,
cohanim, generally translated
priests, must often be
interpreted. Indeed it signifies
any ministers, either of God or
of man. David’s sons, being of
the tribe of Judah, and not of
the posterity of Aaron, could
not be priests, according to the
law. But they were among the
principal officers of his court,
the prime ministers of his
household. Upon the whole, we
find by this chapter that so
long as David was zealous for
the honour of God, and faithful
in the discharge of his duty,
God defended and protected him
against his enemies, and blessed
him with glory and happiness;
but the scene changed when he
provoked God by his sins, as we
see in the sequel of his
history. |