Verse 1
Matthew 16:1. The Pharisees also
with the Sadducees came —
Notwithstanding the difference
of their principles, and the
alienation of their affections
from each other, they now agreed
to join in an attempt upon
Christ; his doctrine being
equally opposed to the errors
and vices of both these sects;
see the note on Matthew 3:7 :
tempting, or, trying him, as
πειραζοντες properly signifies;
(see note on Matthew 4:1,) that
is, making trial, in a crafty
and insnaring manner, whether he
was able to do what they
required: desired a sign from
heaven — Such a sign as they
insinuated Satan could not
counterfeit. They pretended they
were willing to be convinced
that he was the Messiah, could
they see sufficient proofs of
it: whereas they had already
resisted the clearest evidence
of it, and now indeed came with
no design or desire of being
convinced of his divine mission,
but in order that, failing in
the proof which they required,
he might expose himself to
general censure and contempt.
Verse 2-3
Matthew 16:2-3. He answered,
When it is evening, &c. — As if
he had said, It is evident you
ask this out of a desire to
cavil rather than to discern the
divine will, for in other cases
you take up with degrees of
evidence far short of those
which you here reject: as for
instance, you know that a red
sky in the evening is a presage
of fair weather, and a red and
lowering sky in the morning, of
foul weather; thus ye can
discern the face of the sky, and
form from thence very probable
conjectures concerning the
weather; but can ye not discern
the signs of the times — The
signs which evidently show that
this is the time of the Messiah?
The proofs which Jesus was daily
giving them by his wonderful
works, his holy and beneficent
conduct, and heavenly doctrine,
of his divine mission, were more
than sufficient to establish it;
and, had the Pharisees been
possessed of any candour at all,
or any inclination to know the
truth, they could not have been
at a loss to judge in this
matter, especially, as in
ordinary affairs they showed
abundance of acuteness. The
truth is, as our Lord here
signified, their not
acknowledging him as the Messiah
was neither owing to want of
evidence, nor to want of
capacity to judge of that
evidence; but to their self-
confidence and pride, and their
carnal and worldly spirit.
Verse 4
Matthew 16:4. A wicked and
adulterous generation — As if he
had said, Ye would seek no
further sign, did not your
wickedness, and your love of the
world, which is spiritual
adultery, blind your
understanding. There shall no
sign be given, but — of the
Prophet Jonas — Or the miracle
of Christ’s own resurrection, a
sign greater than any of those
showed by the ancient prophets
and messengers of God, and
consequently a sign which proved
Jesus to be superior unto them
all. This sign our Lord had
explained on a former occasion.
See on Matthew 12:40.
Verses 5-12
Matthew 16:5-12. When his
disciples were come to the other
side — Namely, of the sea of
Tiberias, see Mark 8:13; they
had forgotten to take bread —
They had tarried so long in
Dalmanutha, or Magdala, that
they had consumed the seven
baskets of fragments which they
had taken up at the late
miracle, recorded Matthew
15:32-39, and had no more than
one loaf with them in the ship,
Mark 8:14. Then Jesus said,
Beware of the leaven of the
Pharisees — That is, of their
false doctrine; elegantly called
leaven, for it spreads in the
soul, or the church, as leaven
does in meal. And they reasoned
among themselves — What must we
do then for bread, since we have
taken no bread with us? Thus the
slowness of their understanding
showed itself on this occasion,
as it had done on many others.
“As they had forgotten to take
bread, and had often heard the
doctors prohibit the use of the
leaven of heathen and
Samaritans, they thought he
forbade them to buy bread from
bakers of either sect, lest it
might be made with impure
leaven, and so they looked on
the advice as an indirect
reproof of their carelessness.”
Which when Jesus perceived — As
he knew all the secret workings
of their minds; he said, O ye of
little faith, why reason ye? —
Why are ye troubled about this?
Why should your neglecting to
bring bread with you make you
put such an interpretation upon
my words? Am I not able, if need
so require, to supply you by a
word? Observe, reader, to
distrust Christ, and disquiet
our own minds, when we are in
straits and difficulties, is an
evidence of the weakness of our
faith, which, if it were in
exercise as it should be would
deliver us from the burden of
care, by enabling us to cast it
on the Lord, who careth for us.
Do ye not understand — After
having been so long with me, are
ye still ignorant of my power
and goodness? neither remember
the five loaves of the five
thousand, and how many baskets,
&c. — Certainly you are very
stupid, if you have forgotten
how that with five loaves I fed
five thousand men, who, after
being fully satisfied, left a
great deal more than the
quantity that was at first set
before me to divide among them.
Neither the seven loaves of the
four thousand — An instance of a
merciful and miraculous supply
which happened so lately. How is
it that ye do not understand? —
How came ye not to know that he,
who on those different occasions
fed such multitudes with such a
little quantity of food, can
never be at a loss to provide a
meal for twelve? The experience
which they had so lately had of
the power and goodness of Christ
in providing for them, was a
great aggravation of their
distrust. Though they had no
bread with them, they had Him
with them who could provide
bread for them. God’s people may
well be ashamed of the slowness
and dulness of their
apprehensions in divine things;
especially when they have long
enjoyed the means of grace. As
Christ’s disciples well deserved
the sharp rebuke which their
Master gave them on this
occasion, so it had the designed
effect; for it brought the
disciples to understand that he
designed to caution them against
the corrupt doctrines of the
Pharisees and Sadducees; the
pernicious nature and tendency
of which may be learned from
many instances taken notice of
and condemned by Jesus himself,
in the course of his ministry.
Verses 13-16
Matthew 16:13-16. When Jesus
came, &c. — There was a large
interval of time between what
has been related already, and
what follows. The passages that
follow were but a short time
before our Lord suffered: came
into the coasts of Cesarea
Philippi — “This city, while in
the possession of the
Canaanites, was called Lesheim,
Joshua 19:47; and Laish, 18:27.
But when the children of Dan
took it, they named it after
their progenitor. In latter
times it was called Paneas, from
the mountain beneath which it
stood. The situation of Paneas
pleased Philip the tetrarch so
exceedingly, that he resolved to
make it the seat of his court.
For which purpose he enlarged
and adorned it with many
sumptuous buildings, and called
it Cesarea in honour of the
Roman emperor. The tetrarch’s
own name, however, was commonly
added, to distinguish it from
the other Cesarea, so often
mentioned in the Jewish history,
and in the Acts of the Apostles,
which was a fine port on the
Mediterranean sea, and had been
rebuilt by Herod the Great, and
named in honour of Augustus
Cæsar.” — Macknight. Josephus
gives Philip so good a
character, that some have
thought our Lord retired into
his territories for security
from the insults of his enemies
elsewhere. He asked his
disciples, Who do men (Luke
says, the people,) say that I,
the Son of man, am — Who do they
take me to be, who am really a
man, born of a woman, and in
outward appearance a mere man?
Or, as some understand the
expression, Who do men say that
I am? the Son of man? Do they
say that I am the Son of man,
the Messiah? So Macknight, with
some others, thinks the words
ought to be placed and pointed,
to make them agree with the
question which Christ afterward
proposed to his disciples,
namely, But who say ye that I
am? words which imply that he
had not yet directly assumed the
title of the Messiah, at least
in their hearing. Dr. Lightfoot,
however, conjectures that Christ
here inquires, not barely
whether the people thought him
to be the Christ, but what kind
of person they thought him to
be: the Jews then doubting
concerning the original of him
who was to be the Messiah, and
whether he was to come from the
living or the dead. And it must
be acknowledged, that the word
τινα, whom, often relates to the
quality of the person spoken of.
So John 8:53, τινα, whom makest
thou thyself? Christ made this
inquiry, not because he was
ignorant what the people thought
and spoke of him, for their
thoughts and words were
perfectly known to him, but that
he might have, from themselves,
a declaration of their faith,
and might therefrom take
occasion of confirming and
strengthening them in it. In
answer to the question
concerning the people, the
disciples reply, Some say, thou
art John the Baptist — Namely,
risen from the dead, and with an
additional power of working
miracles; some, Elias — That
thou art Elijah the prophet,
come to prepare the way of the
Messiah; and others, Jeremias,
or one of the prophets — There
was at that time a current
tradition among the Jews, that
either Jeremiah, or some other
of the ancient prophets, would
rise again before the Messiah
came. Most part of the people
took Jesus for a different
person from what he was, because
he had nothing of the outward
pomp or grandeur in which they
supposed the Messiah was to
appear. Therefore, that he might
give his disciples, who had long
been witnesses of his miracles,
and had attended on his
ministry, an opportunity of
declaring their opinion of him,
he proceeded to ask, But who say
ye that I am? And Peter, who was
generally the most forward to
speak, replied in the name of
the rest, Thou art the Christ,
the Son of the living God — That
is, his son in a peculiar sense,
and therefore a person of
infinitely greater dignity than
either John the Baptist, or
Elias, or Jeremiah, or any other
prophet.
Verse 17
Matthew 16:17. Jesus answered,
Blessed [or happy, as μακαριος
signifies] art thou, Simon
Bar-jona, (or the son of Jonas,)
namely, in being brought thus
firmly to believe and confess
this most important truth, on
believing and confessing which
the present and everlasting
salvation of mankind depends.
For flesh and blood hath not
revealed it unto thee — “Thou
hast not learned it by human
report, or the unassisted
sagacity of thy own mind; but my
Father in heaven has discovered
it to thee, and wrought in thy
soul this cordial assent, in the
midst of those various
prejudices against it which
present circumstances might
suggest.” Our Lord proceeds, and
promises, (alluding to his
surname of Peter, from πετρα, a
rock,) that he should have a
principal concern in
establishing Christ’s kingdom.
Thou art Peter — As if he had
said, “Thou art, as thy name
signifies, a substantial rock;
and as thou hast shown it in
this good confession, I assure
thee that upon this rock I will
build my church. Faith in me as
the Son of God shall be its
great support, and I will use
thee as a glorious instrument in
raising it: yea, so immoveable
and firm shall its foundation
be, and so secure the
superstructure, that though
earth and hell unite their
assaults against it, and death
in its most dreadful forms be
armed for its destruction; the
gates of hell, or the unseen
world, shall not finally prevail
against it to its ruin: but one
generation of Christians shall
arise after another, even to the
very end of time, to maintain
this truth, and to venture their
lives and their souls upon it,
till at length the whole body of
them be redeemed from the power
of the grave.” See Doddridge,
who further observes, “This is
one of those scriptures, the
sense of which might be most
certainly fixed by the
particular tone of voice and
gesture with which it was
spoken. If our Lord altered his
accent, and laid his hand on his
breast, it would show that he
spoke, not of the person, but of
the confession of Peter, (as
most Protestant divines have
understood it,) and meant to
point out himself as the great
foundation.” Compare 1
Corinthians 3:10-11. In
confirmation of this sense, it
may be observed, that when our
Lord says, Upon this rock, he
does not make use of the word
πετρος, as if he referred to
Peter himself, but πετρα, which
is an appellative noun, and
immediately refers to Peter’s
confession. “But if, when our
Lord uttered these words, he
turned to the other apostles,
and pointed to Peter, that would
show he meant to intimate the
honour he would do him, in
making him an eminent support to
his church. This is the sense
which Grotius, Le Clerc, Dr.
Whitby, and L’Enfant defend. But
to be a foundation in this
sense, was not Peter’s honour
alone; his brethren shared with
him in it, (see Ephesians 2:20;
Revelation 21:14,) as they did
also in the power of binding and
loosing, Matthew 18:18; John
20:23. — On the whole, how weak
the arguments are which the
Papists draw from hence, to
support the supremacy of Peter
in their wild sense of it, is
sufficiently shown by Bishop
Burnet On the Articles, p. 196;
Dr. Barrow On the Creed, sermon
twenty- eight; Dr. Patrick in
his sermon on this text, and
many more not necessary to be
named. There seems a reference
in this expression to the common
custom of building citadels upon
a rock.” The gates of hell — As
gates and walls were the
strength of cities, and as
courts of judicature were held
in their gates, this phrase
properly signifies the power and
policy of Satan and his
instruments: shall not prevail
against it — Not against the
church universal, so as to
destroy it. And they never did,
for there hath been a small
remnant in all ages. And they
never will, for faithful is he
who hath made this promise, and
he will certainly fulfil it.
Verse 19
Matthew 16:19. I will give thee
the keys of the kingdom of
heaven — This expression is
metaphorical. As stewards of
great families, especially of
the royal household, bore a key
or keys in token of their
office, the phrase of giving a
person the keys naturally grew
into use, as an expression
significative of raising him to
great authority and power. See
note on Isaiah 22:22. The
meaning of the promise here is,
that Christ would give Peter,
(but not to him alone, for
similar promises are made to all
the apostles,) power to open the
gospel dispensation, (which he
did, both to Jews and Gentiles;
see Acts 3:14; Acts 10:34; being
the first who preached the
gospel to them;) and to declare
authoritatively the laws
thereof, and the terms of
salvation, as also to exercise
discipline in the Christian
Church, namely, to refuse
admission into it to all those
who did not comply with those
terms, and to exclude from it
all such as should violate those
laws. According to this sense of
the words, the power of binding
and loosing, added to the power
of the keys, may be considered
as partly explicatory thereof.
“It can be no objection,” says
Dr. Macknight, “against this
interpretation, that it connects
the idea of binding and loosing
with that of the keys, contrary
to the exact propriety of the
two metaphors; for all who have
studied the Scriptures know,
that in many passages the ideas
and expressions are accommodated
to the subject matter, rather
than to the precedent metaphor.”
In further proof that the power
of binding and loosing, now
conferred on Peter, and
afterward on all the apostles,
chap. Matthew 18:18, included a
power of declaring the laws of
the gospel and the terms of
salvation, as well as all those
acts of discipline which Peter
and his brethren performed as
apostles, it may be observed,
that “in the Jewish language, to
bind and loose were words made
use of by the doctors, to
signify the unlawfulness or
lawfulness of things, as Seldon,
Buxtorf, and Lightfoot have
proved. Wherefore our Lord’s
meaning, at least in part, was,
Whatever things thou shalt bind
up from men, or declare to be
forbidden to them, on earth,
shall be forbidden by Heaven;
and whatever things thou shalt
loose to men, or permit to be
done, shall be lawful and
obligatory in the esteem of
Heaven. Accordingly the gender
made use of in both passages
agrees to this interpretation.”
There are some, however, who by
the power of binding and loosing
understand the power of actually
remitting and retaining men’s
sins; and in support of their
opinion they quote John 20:22.
But it may be justly doubted
whether our Lord ever bestowed
on his apostles, or any other of
his ministers, any other power
of remitting or retaining men’s
sins, than, 1st, the power of
declaring with authority the
Christian terms of pardon, that
is, whose sins are remitted and
whose are retained; as is done
in the form of absolution
contained in the Liturgy: and,
2d, a power of inflicting and
remitting ecclesiastical
censures, that is, of excluding
from and readmitting into a
Christian congregation; together
with a particular power of
remitting and retaining, in
certain instances, the temporal
punishment of men’s sins, which
it is evident from some passages
of the Acts and the Epistles,
the apostles occasionally
exercised. “This high power of
declaring the terms of salvation
and precepts of the gospel, the
apostles did not enjoy in its
full extent till the memorable
day of pentecost, when they
received the Holy Ghost in the
plenitude of his gifts. After
this their decisions, in points
of doctrine and duty, being all
given by inspiration, were
infallible definitions, and
ratified in heaven. Here then
was an immense honour conferred
on the apostles, and what must
yield great consolation to the
pious. There is nothing doubtful
in the gospel, much less false:
but we may safely rest the
salvation of our souls on the
discoveries there made to us,
since they have all come
originally from God.”
Verse 20
Matthew 16:20. Then charged he
his disciples — Greek,
διεστειλατο, he strictly charged
them: (Luke says, επιτιμησας
αυτοις, παρηγγειλε, having
severely charged, or charged
with threats, he commanded to
tell this to no one:) that he
was Jesus the Christ — The word
Jesus is omitted here in many
MSS., some of which are of great
authority and great antiquity,
and in several ancient versions,
and the omission is approved of
by some eminent critics.
Certainly the insertion of it is
superfluous, and apparently
improper: for the context shows,
that what our Lord forbade them
to tell was simply that he was
the Christ, that is, the
Messiah, or, as Luke expresses
it, the Christ of God. This
truth, however important to be
known and believed, the
disciples were not to announce
to the people till the grand
proof of it was given, namely,
his resurrection. Then they were
by office to be his witnesses,
and to declare openly and
publicly that he was the Christ,
because then they could do it,
not only without suspicion of
confederacy, but with greater
advantage and better success, as
Christ would then be no longer
subject to those humbling
circumstances and sufferings,
and that death, which could not
fail to be a great obstruction
to men’s receiving him as the
Messiah, as well as a great
stumbling-block in the way of
his disciples, but would have
taken possession of his kingdom,
and given evidence of it, by
sending down upon his followers
the Holy Ghost, in his
extraordinary gifts and
operations, to enable them to
confirm this testimony. Whereas,
had his own disciples publicly
declared him to be the Messiah,
the king of the Jews, and the
Son of God, while he was on
earth, as this would have looked
like a confederacy between them
and their Master, so, on the one
hand, it would have encouraged
the attempt of a part of the
Jews to come and take him by
force to make him a king, John
6:15, and, on the other, would
have provoked both the Jewish
rulers and the Roman government.
“Certainly,” says Mr. Locke,
“the Romans would not have
suffered him, if he had gone
about preaching that he was the
king whom the Jews expected; and
such an accusation would have
been forwardly brought against
him by the Jews, if they could
have heard it out of his own
mouth, and if that had been his
public doctrine to his
followers, which was openly
preached by his apostles after
his death. For though the
magistrates of this world paid
no great regard to the talk of a
king who had suffered death, and
appeared no longer anywhere; yet
if our Lord had openly declared
this of himself in his lifetime,
with a train of disciples and
followers, everywhere owning and
crying him up for their king,
the Roman governors of Judea
could not have forborne to take
notice of it, and to make use of
their force against it. The Jews
well understood this, and
therefore they made use of it,
as the strongest accusation, and
likeliest to prevail with Pilate
against him for the taking away
his life, it being treason, and
an unpardonable offence, which
could not escape death from a
Roman deputy, without the
forfeiture of his own life.”
Verse 21
Matthew 16:21. From that time
forth — When they had made that
full confession of Christ that
he was the Messiah, the Son of
God; began Jesus to show unto
his disciples — Another most
important point, namely, that he
must suffer and be put to death,
as a malefactor. If they had not
been well grounded in their
belief of Christ’s being the Son
of God, it would have been a
great shock to their faith to be
informed that he must suffer and
die. Some hints, indeed, our
Lord had already given of his
sufferings, as when he said,
Destroy this temple, and spoke
of the Son of man being lifted
up, and of eating his flesh and
drinking his blood; but hitherto
he had not spoken plainly and
expressly of the subject,
because the disciples were weak,
and could not have borne the
notice of a thing so very
strange and so very melancholy.
But now, as they were more
advanced in knowledge and
stronger in faith, he began to
reveal this to them: for he
declares his mind to his people
gradually, and lets in light as
they can bear it, and are
prepared to receive it. How that
he must go unto Jerusalem — The
holy city, the royal city, and
suffer there. Though he had
lived most of his time in
Galilee, he must die at
Jerusalem; there all the
sacrifices were offered; and
there, therefore, He must die
who was to be the great
sacrifice. Thither he was to go
within the short space of a few
months, this declaration being
made in the last year of his
life: and instead of being
owned, under the royal character
he bore, and submitted to by the
princes and people, must suffer
many things from the elders —
The most honourable and
experienced men; from the chief
priests — Accounted the most
religious, and the scribes — The
most learned body of men in the
nation. These made up the great
sanhedrim, which sat at
Jerusalem, and was had in
veneration by the people: and
these one would have expected to
have been the very first to
receive him. But instead of
this, they were the most bitter
in persecuting him! Strange,
indeed, that men of knowledge in
the Scriptures, who professed to
expect the Messiah’s coming, and
sustained a sacred character,
should use him with such
contumely and cruelty when he
came! It was the Roman power,
indeed, that condemned and
crucified Christ; but the
principal share of the guilt of
the whole business lies at the
door of the chief priests and
scribes, who were the first and
principal movers in it. From
them he suffered many things,
things which manifested their
insatiable malice, and his
invincible patience, and in the
issue was killed: for nothing
short of his death would either
satisfy the malice of his
enemies, or render him a proper
sacrifice for the sins of
mankind. Our Lord, however,
while he brought to his
disciples these melancholy
tidings, added, for their
support and encouragement under
this gloomy prospect, that in
the third day he should be
raised again. And thus, as all
the prophets had done, when he
testified beforehand his
sufferings, he bore witness
likewise to the glory that
should follow, 1 Peter 1:11. His
rising again the third day
proved him to be the Son of God,
notwithstanding his sufferings,
and therefore he mentions it in
order that the faith of the
disciples might not fail.
Verse 22
Matthew 16:22. Then Peter took
him — προσλαβομενος αυτον. What
the evangelist meant precisely
by this expression, commentators
are not agreed. Dr. Doddridge
renders it, taking him by the
hand; Mr. Wesley, taking hold of
him: others again render it,
embracing him; and others,
interrupting him. Dr. Campbell
renders it, taking him aside, a
translation which, he observes,
evidently suits the meaning of
the verb in other places, and is
necessary in Acts 18:26, which
cannot be interpreted otherwise.
And began to rebuke [or reprove]
him — So the expression, ηρξατο
επιτιμαν αυτω, properly
signifies. “Some interpreters,
indeed, to put the best face on
Peter’s conduct on this
occasion, render the words thus,
Began to expostulate with him.
But when the verb, επιτιμαν,
relates to any thing past, it
always implies a declaration of
censure or blame; and if it be
thought that this would infer
great presumption in Peter, it
may be asked, Does not the
rebuke which he drew on himself,
Matthew 16:23, from so mild a
Master, evidently infer as much?
When we consider the prejudices
of the disciples in regard to
the nature of the Messiah’s
kingdom, we cannot be much
surprised that a declaration,
such as that in Matthew 16:21,
totally subversive of all their
hopes, should produce, in a warm
temper, a great impropriety of
behaviour, such as (admitting
the ordinary interpretation of
the word) Peter was then
chargeable with.” Be it far from
thee, Lord — Or, ιλεως σοι seems
to be more accurately rendered
in the margin, Pity thyself or
be merciful to, or favour,
thyself — “The advice of the
world, the flesh, and the
devil,” says Mr. Wesley, “to
every one of our Lord’s
followers.” The common use of
this phrase, however, in the
LXX., would lead one to
understand it as signifying,
absit, God forbid. In this
sense, also, it is used in the
Apocrypha, thus, 1 Maccabees
2:21, ιλεως ημιν καταλιπειν
νομον, God forbid that we should
forsake the law. Peter, to whom
the power of the keys, or place
of high-steward, in the kingdom,
as he would understand it, was
promised, could not help being
very much displeased to hear his
Master talk of dying at
Jerusalem, immediately after he
had been saluted Messiah, and
had accepted the title.
Therefore he rebuked, or
reproved him, as has been just
observed.
Verse 23
Matthew 16:23. But he turned and
said unto Peter — Mark reads,
When he had turned about and
looked on his disciples, (who by
the air of their countenances,
probably, seemed to approve what
they had heard Peter say to
him,) he rebuked Peter, saying,
Get thee behind me, Satan — That
is, out of my sight. “He looked
at him,” says Baxter, “with
displeasure, and said, I say to
thee as I did to the devil when
he tempted me, Get thee behind
me, for thou doest the work of
Satan, the adversary, in
tempting me, for
self-preservation, to violate my
Father’s command, and my
undertaking, and to forsake the
work of man’s redemption and
salvation. As thy counsel
savoureth not the things that be
of God, (namely, his will, work,
and glory,) but the things that
be of men, (or the love of the
body and this present life,) so
it signifies what is in thy
heart; take heed lest this
carnality prevail.” Our Lord is
not recorded to have given so
sharp a reproof to any other of
his apostles, on any occasion.
He saw it was needful for the
pride of Peter’s heart, puffed
up with the commendation lately
given him. Perhaps the term
Satan may not barely mean, Thou
art my enemy, while thou
fanciest thyself most my friend;
but also, Thou art acting the
very part of Satan, both by
endeavouring to hinder the
redemption of mankind, and by
giving me the most deadly advice
that can ever spring from the
pit of hell. Thou savourest not
— Dost not relish or desire. We
may learn from hence, 1st, that
whosoever says to us in such a
case, Favour thyself is acting
the part of the devil: 2d, that
the proper answer to such an
adviser is, Get thee behind me:
3d, that otherwise he will be an
offence to us, an occasion of
our stumbling, if not falling:
4th, that this advice always
proceeds from the not relishing
the things of God, but the
things of men. Yea, so far is
this advice, Favour thyself,
from being fit for a Christian
either to give or take, that if
any man will come after Christ,
his very first step is, To deny
or renounce himself: in the room
of his own will, to substitute
the will of God, as his one
principle of action. We see in
this example of Peter, how soon
a person favoured with the
peculiar approbation of the Lord
Jesus may, through pride and
self-confidence, fall under his
heavy displeasure, and incur a
severe rebuke from him. “Our
Lord, immediately after
pronouncing Peter blessed, on
account of his faith and the
noble confession which he made
of it, and after conferring on
him the high dignity before
mentioned, did openly, in the
hearing of all the disciples,
call him Satan, or adversary,
and declare that he had then no
relish for the divine
appointments, but was influenced
merely by human views and
expectations of worldly
interest. If the papists rightly
attended to this passage of the
history, they would see their
fancies about the primacy of
Peter, which they build upon it,
in a better light than they now
seem to do.”
Verse 24
Matthew 16:24. Then said Jesus
unto his disciples — In Mark we
read, When he had called the
people unto him, and his
disciples also, he said unto
them; and in Luke, He said to
them all, If any man will come
after me — ει τις θελει, If any
man be willing, no one is
forced: but if any will be a
Christian, it must be on the
following terms. Let him deny
himself — A rule that can never
be too much observed: let him in
all things deny his own will,
however pleasing, and do the
will of God, however painful.
And take up his cross — Of the
origin and meaning of this
phrase, see note on Matthew
10:38. And we may here further
learn, that after having
undergone many afflictions and
trials, the disciples of Christ
may still look for more, which,
when laid upon them, they must
endeavour, by the grace of God,
to sustain with equal patience,
following their Master in the
footsteps of his sufferings.
This, indeed, is a very hard and
difficult lesson, but at the
same time it is absolutely
necessary. Because if we grow
impatient under sufferings, and
endeavour to avoid the crosses
which God is pleased to lay upon
us, we shall displease God,
grieve his Spirit, and bring
ourselves under guilt and
condemnation. And should we not
consider all crosses, all things
grievous to flesh and blood, as
what they really are, as
opportunities of embracing God’s
will, at the expense of our own?
and consequently as so many
steps by which we may advance in
holiness? We should make a swift
progress in the spiritual life,
if we were faithful in this
practice. Crosses are so
frequent, that whoever makes
advantage of them will soon be a
great gainer. Great crosses are
occasions of great improvement:
and the little ones which come
daily, and even hourly, make up
in number what they want in
weight. We may, in these daily
and hourly crosses, make
effectual oblations of our will
to God: which oblations, so
frequently repeated, will soon
amount to a great sum. Let us
remember, then, (what can never
be sufficiently inculcated,)
that God is the author of all
events: that none is so small or
inconsiderable as to escape his
notice and direction. Every
event, therefore, declares to us
the will of God, to which, thus
declared, we should heartily
submit. We should renounce our
own to embrace it. We should
approve and choose what his
choice warrants as best for us.
Herein should we exercise
ourselves continually; this
should be our practice all the
day long. We should in humility
accept the little crosses that
are dispensed to us, as those
that best suit our weakness. Let
us bear these little things, at
least, for God’s sake, and
prefer his will to our own in
matters of so small importance.
And his goodness will accept
these mean oblations; for he
despiseth not the day of small
things.
Verses 25-27
Matthew 16:25-27. Whosoever will
save his life — At the expense
of his conscience: whosoever, in
the very highest instance, that
of life itself, will not
renounce himself, shall be lost
eternally. But can any man hope
he should be able thus to
renounce himself, if he cannot
do it in the smallest instances?
And whosoever will lose his
life, shall find it — What he
loses on earth he shall find in
heaven. See note on Matthew
10:39, where this sentence is
explained more at large. For
what is a man profited, &c. —
“To carry home the argument more
closely, he puts them in mind of
the method according to which
men estimate things. If God
should offer the riches of
Solomon, the strength of Samson,
the policy of Ahithophel, the
beauty of Absalom, the eloquence
of Apollos, universal monarchy,
and all kinds of pleasures, and
should say, Take them for one
hour, and then die; who is the
man that would not immediately
reject the proposed condition,
and reply, that life is better
than them all? But will men
forego every earthly thing for
life, the life of the body? and
will they not part with them,
nay, and with life itself, for
their souls? since the longest
any one can enjoy this life with
its pleasures, is, in comparison
of eternity, no longer than he
enjoys the good things
mentioned, who dies in the same
hour he receives them.” —
Macknight. Or, what shall a man
give in exchange for his soul —
Namely, at the day of judgment?
For the Son of man shall come in
the glory of his Father — For
you may certainly depend upon it
that, howsoever he may be now
despised and rejected of men,
there is a day appointed when he
will come in all the glory of
the Godhead, encircled in the
most pompous manner with his
holy angels: and then shall he
convene the whole world before
him, that he may determine the
final happiness or misery of
each, and recompense every man
according to his conduct. Thus,
“that the argument, by which the
necessity of self-denial is so
clearly established, might have
the greater weight, our Lord
speaks more particularly
concerning the rewards and
punishments of a future state,
assuring his disciples that they
are all to be distributed by
himself, the Father having
appointed him the universal
Judge, so that his enemies
cannot flatter themselves with a
hope of escaping condign
punishment, nor his friends be
in the least afraid of losing
their reward.”
Verse 28
Matthew 16:28. Verily, there be
some standing here, &c. — And
that you may not doubt that
there shall be a day of
judgment, when I shall come
clothed with divine majesty, to
render unto men according to
their actions in this life, let
me assure you there are some
here present that shall not die
till they shall see a faint
representation of this, in
events which will soon take
place, especially in my coming
to set up my mediatorial kingdom
with great power and glory, in
the increase of my church, and
the destruction of mine enemies.
Accordingly the disciples saw
their Master coming in his
kingdom, when they were
witnesses of his
transfiguration, resurrection,
and ascension, and the
miraculous gifts of his Spirit
conferred upon them; and lived
to see Jerusalem, with the
Jewish state, destroyed, and the
gospel propagated through the
greatest part of the then known
world. |