PREFACE
Philippi was a considerable
city on the eastern frontier of
Macedonia, now part of European
Turkey. It was anciently named
Datos; but Philip, the father of
Alexander the Great, having
repaired, enlarged, and
beautified it, called it
“Philippi,” after his own name.
It stood to the north-west of
Neapolis, about seventy miles
north-east of Thessalonica, and
about one hundred and ninety
west of the place where
Constantinople now stands.
Julius Cesar placed a colony
here, which Augustus afterward
enlarged, and hence the
inhabitants were considered as
freemen of Rome. It was rendered
remarkable for the famous battle
fought near it, between the
Roman Emperor Augustus and
Antony on one side, and Brutus
and Cassius, the republican
generals, on the other. But it
is more remarkable among
Christians for the Christian
church which was early planted
there, and for this excellent
epistle, written to the members
thereof about twelve years
after, namely, during the latter
part of the apostle’s
imprisonment at Rome, about the
year 64 or 65, and sent by
Epaphroditus.
Of the first introduction of the
gospel into Macedonia, an
account has been given, Acts
16:9, &c. St. Paul, with his
assistants, Silas and Timothy,
after having preached the gospel
in most of the countries of the
Lesser Asia, were directed by
the Holy Ghost to pass over into
Europe, for the purpose of
offering salvation to the
Greeks, at that time the most
celebrated people in the world
for genius and learning. These
messengers of God, therefore,
loosing from Troas, landed at
Neapolis; but making no stay
there, they went directly
forward to Philippi, where, it
appears from Acts 16:18, they
abode a considerable time, and
were instrumental in converting
many to the faith of Christ.
It appears they met with no
opposition in this place, till
the apostle cast a spirit of
divination out of a damsel. But
that circumstance so enraged her
masters, who made a considerable
advantage of her “soothsaying,”
that they stirred up the
inhabitants against Paul and
Silas, whom, after they had laid
many stripes on them, they threw
into prison, the jailer making
“their feet fast in the stocks.”
But the Lord, whose servants
they were, soon released them by
a signal miracle, as is recorded
Acts 16:25; and the magistrates,
finding that they were Romans,
came and took them out of
prison, and treated them
civilly; desiring them, however,
for the quiet of the city, to
depart out of it: which they
did, when they had seen and
conversed with the new converts,
and had comforted them. But
though Paul and Silas for the
present left Philippi, Luke and
Timothy continued there some
time longer, to carry on the
work which had been so
successfully begun. And this, it
is probable, was one reason that
induced the apostle to fix upon
the latter as the most proper
person to visit the Philippians
in his absence, of whose
affection for them, and concern
for their interests, he takes
particular notice, Philippians
2:19-22.
That the apostle himself made
the Philippians a second visit,
appears from Acts 20:6; though
we are not informed of any
particulars relating to it. And
it is highly probable that he
visited them often, as he passed
to and from Greece. And, indeed,
the peculiar affection and
respect which they manifested to
the apostle, entitled them to
some distinguished regard: for
while he preached in
Thessalonica, they sent him
money twice. And this, it seems,
they did, both from the
gratitude which they felt to him
for being instrumental in
bringing them out of the
darkness of heathenism, and from
the concern they had that the
success of the gospel should not
be hindered among their
countrymen, by its preachers
becoming burdensome to them. The
same regard they showed to him,
and for the same reason, while
he preached the gospel in
Corinth, 2 Corinthians 11:9. He
also acknowledges (Philippians
4:18) to have received a present
from them by the hands of
Epaphroditus, when he was a
prisoner at Rome.
These, however, were not the
only proofs which the
Philippians gave of their love
to the apostle, and the religion
which they had received. Their
behaviour in other respects was
every way worthy of their
profession. They maintained the
doctrine of the gospel in its
purity, and walked in the holy
manner required by its precepts.
Indeed, the excellent character
of these Christians may be
inferred from the manner in
which this epistle is written.
For, while most of his other
letters contain reprehensions of
some for their errors, and of
others for their bad conduct,
throughout the whole of this
epistle to the Philippians no
fault is found with any of them;
unless the caution, (Philippians
2:3-4,) to avoid strife and vain
glory in the exercise of their
spiritual gifts, can be called a
reprehension. But his letter is
employed almost wholly in
commending and encouraging them,
or in giving them exhortations
to persevere and make advances
in the good ways of the Lord.
But though the apostle did not
see it needful to censure or
reprove the Philippian believers
for any thing, he judged it
necessary to pass a severe
censure on some Judaizing
teachers, who were endeavouring
to introduce themselves among
them, as they had done among the
Christians in other places,
making it, as it seems, their
whole business to destroy the
purity and peace of the
churches. Of these corrupters of
the gospel the apostle, out of
his zeal for the truth, and his
great love to his Philippian
converts, speaks with more
severity than in any of his
other letters, being doubtless
directed so to do by a
particular impulse of the Spirit
of God, who knew it necessary
that this sharpness should be
used for opening the eyes of the
faithful, and making them
sensible of the malignity of
these false teachers, and of the
pernicious tendency of their
doctrine.
|