QUESTIONS/ANSWERS ON THE
SACRAMENTS OF THE CHURCH
QUESTION #264 -- Is there any
age limit for those who
participate in the sacrament of
the Lord's Supper? If not do you
think it wise to administer it
to the children under five?
ANSWER #264 -- There is no age
limit, but I think children
under five could scarcely be
expected to understand enough of
the meaning of the sacrament to
be profited by it. It would vary
with different children, of
course, but I think seven young
even for those who have been
trained in our homes, Sunday
schools and churches.
* * *
QUESTION #265 -- Please explain
in I Corinthians 11:30, "For
this cause many are weak and
sickly among you, and many
sleep."
ANSWER #265 -- This is a part of
the apostle's treatise on the
celebration of the sacrament of
the Lord's Supper. The careless
manner in which the Corinthians
had been celebrating it had led
to other and more serious
offenses and to weakness and
backsliding among the members.
Irreverence in the house of God
breeds contempt for the things
of God and brings about
shallowness and spiritual
declension. I have seen
instances in which parents
allowed their children to run
and play in the church or
tabernacle until I am sure the
spirit of the meetings was hurt.
And I have seen singers and
preachers proceed with an
evident lightness that presaged
the running of the spiritual
plow out of the ground. Let us
take warning and instruction
from Paul's words to the
Corinthians which concluded with
the words, "Let everything be
done in decency and in order."
* * *
QUESTION #266 -- The Roman
Catholic Church believes that
the bread and wine. for the
Lord's Supper actually turn into
the flesh and blood of the Lord
as soon as the priest sanctifies
it. Two Chinese Catholic priests
recently told me of an instance
in which a Protestant in Italy
or France entered a church
during high mass, and being
utterly opposed to the idea that
the bread and wine become flesh
and blood, he rushed to the
altar, snatched the bread from
the hand of the priest and began
to cut it into pieces. To his
horror and amazement the blood
began to flow freely from the
supposed bread. I am told there
are many stories like this. Is
there any foundation for such
stories? If not, what does the
Lord mean when He says, "Whoso
eateth my flesh and drinketh my
blood, dwelleth in me. and I in
him. Except ye eat of the flesh
of the Son of man and drink of
his blood ye have no life in
you. Whosoever eateth my flesh
and drinketh my blood hath
eternal life and I will raise
him up at the last day"?
ANSWER #266 -- There is of
course no foundation in facts
for these fabulous stories by
which Rome keeps credulous
people under her influence. And
what is more, the whole Roman
Catholic theory of
transubstantiation is a
fabrication of the hierarchy and
is unscriptural and pagan. As to
the meaning of the scripture
quoted above: the plain meaning
is that one must draw his
spiritual life from Christ or
have no life at all. At the time
these words were spoken they
were applied as a present test,
and yet the sacrament of the
Lord's Supper had not yet been
established. We may therefore be
sure that there is no direct
reference to this sacrament in
the passage. The meaning is
deeper and more fundamental. One
might partake of the elements of
the sacrament and still have no
life. But if he eats the flesh
and drinks the blood of Christ
he invariably and without fail
does have life. The reference is
not therefore to any outward
ordinance but to faith in Christ
by means of which one becomes
partaker of His vital salvation
and abiding life. "He that
believeth on the Son hath
everlasting life" is a parallel
passage. And "He that believeth
not shall be damned" is the
equivalent of the other side of
the statement Except one partake
of the life which is provided in
Christ he abideth in death.
* * *
QUESTION #267 -- The scripture
which says, "Repent and be
baptized" seems to make water
baptism a very important part in
fully and wholly obeying the
Scriptures. Is this not so? If a
person was baptized as an
infant, will this baptism answer
for the baptism which is
commanded in connection with
repentance?
ANSWER #267 -- It is difficult
for people to get away from the
idea that water baptism is in
some sense a saving ordinance:
hence all the controversies
concerning mode, etc. Baptism is
"an outward sign of an inner
work of grace," and a sign of
the covenant of grace. It should
not be refused nor neglected.
But if one is satisfied with the
baptism which was administered
to him in infancy, who is there
that is authorized to become
conscience for him and compel
him to do that which his own
conscience does not require?
|