ABANDONMENT OR CONSECRATION.
In order to understand properly the requirements of God at this
juncture it will be well to find out three things: (1) The condition of
the seeking soul, (2) the nature of the experience he is seeking, and (3)
the relation to God he now sustains and will sustain when cleansed from
all sin.
First, the contract made with God by the seeker for pardon is complete,
so far as the will and voluntary conditions are concerned. Its only lack
is in the fact that the heart is unclean, the nature of sin causing
involuntary movements contrary to the love of God. These involuntary
movements or elements in the soul cause undue attachments to legitimate
objects, as well as sinful leanings toward wrong objects. To illustrate:
Conjugal love in itself is always right, but in the unclean soul there is
a selfish or sensual element that vitiates it. Right affections never
interfere with the pure love of God, but this sinful element of the soul
causes the man involuntarily to place his wife either in some sense in the
place that belongs to God, or to hold her in less esteem than he ought.
The same principle is applicable to other matters. This is the real
condition of the seeking soul.
The second point necessary to settle is the nature of the experience for
which the soul struggles. The answer to this inquiry is involved
negatively in the foregoing paragraph. He seeks entire conformity to the
nature of God; or, rather, he seeks in its fullness the nature which God
designs him to possess. He is already "set apart," but he sees an element
in his heart that pollutes the sacrifice. Over this he mourns, and from
this he seeks deliverance. He cries,
"'Tis worse than death my God to love,
And not my God alone."
When he gains the goal for which he strives his heart will be all love,
with no admixture of inordinate affection a heart so clean that it
naturally and without effort is as it should be; a heart which, so far as
it rightly understands, loves no object either more or less than it
should; which is centered in God, and moves not for one moment from that
center. This is the experience he seeks, and which God will give him if he
perseveres.
The third question is as to the relation he does now, and will, when
cleansed, sustain to God. The justified soul is at peace with God. He asks
to know God's will, and when he knows, does it. But he is conscious that
in his soul is an element not in harmony with God, and that hinders if it
does not fully prevent him from doing God's will. He is God's child, but
still has involuntary inward longings for things that are not good for
him. The fact is that in the determinations of his will he is all God's
property; but there is within an involuntary principle that hinders him
from being as completely lost in God's will as he sees he should be. Such
is the relation he now sustains to God.
In the experience of entire sanctification this involuntary principle is
removed, and the soul is "filled with all the fullness of God," and
thereby "made perfect in love." Without a single qualifying condition the
man is now God's peculiar treasure; a royal diadem in the hand of his God,
without a rival to dispute God's claims upon him. He has thirsted that all
his being might be purified and given to God without even involuntary
self-clingings or inclinations to wrong; and now he realizes the
fulfillment of his desires, and sees that all through his soul he is all
God's property only and always God's. Such is the relation he will sustain
to God when cleansed.
Since this involuntary principle of the soul is not reached by anything
that is done by the seeker for pardon, it must of necessity be reached by
a deeper and more penetrating action, and this is found in the abandonment
of his entire being to God, that he may do with the individual as seems
best in his wisdom and righteousness; and when the seeker thus abandons
himself to God, the blood is applied which purges away his inbred
uncleanness. The definition of abandon is, "To forsake, or renounce
utterly; to give up wholly; desert; quit; leave" (Standard Dictionary).
There are absolutely no specifications as to what shall be done with the
offering. The whole being is given to God, utterly renounced, and
deserted. All, even involuntary claims, are quit, and God can do as he
pleases with his property and not hear a single murmur because of his
providences.
When praying for pardon the seeker sees that he is wicked and has been
used as a tool for the devil and sin. The desire of his heart is that his
sins may be forgiven, and that he may be set apart from an unholy to a
sacred use. But now, when seeking holiness, he sees that although in God's
sight and also in the full purpose of his will he is already sacred
property; yet his sacredness has been defiled by the carnal, self life
within, and that God has been hindered from having his perfect way. As a
consequence, his prayer is that he may be thoroughly purged from inbred
sin, to the end that he may serve God perfectly. He is already sacred to
God's use, but he desires to be where God can use him as he pleases, and
with no inward foe to rival his claims. To this end he surrenders himself
to the cross of crucifixion; abandons himself to God without reference to
the use God will make of him; determines to quit even trying to dictate to
God. His cry is, "0 God, remove the thing that has hindered thee from
having thy perfect way, and use me henceforth as thou dost choose, for joy
or sorrow, for ease or pain."
Let us look a little deeper into this glorious doctrine of abandonment,
and, as we do so, we shall find beautiful things, if we view them from the
victory side, but hard things, if viewed from the carnal side. Abandonment
is the yielding of the attachments we have had for legitimate objects, --
the wrong bias we have had for them. For instance, the idolatrous
attachments one may have for the objects of his domestic love, the unclean
leaven which may have polluted his conjugal or parental affections. It may
seem to him that these objects of his love will actually go, but on the
resurrection side he finds that, instead of this he loves them with a
dearer, cleaner love. One must also die to the servile attachments he has
had to the opinions of the saints or the creed of his church; must die
even to that sensual clinging he has had for spiritual delights, and which
would substitute these pleasures for faith in God; for God will have our
undivided confidence, and love and service. Some one has said that we must
not only die to our sinful self, but also to our righteous self.
Every one who gets a clear view of his own soul will find that, although
grace cries for deliverance, there still remains within an element of
evil, or a tendency to cling tenaciously to the self life, something that
says, "I will not die." Carnality hates death. Grace says it must die, but
nature stubbornly refuses. This unwillingness cannot be helped, it is the
nature of the man of sin with which we are dealing. You can never expect
to be rid of that feeling till you are rid of the carnal mind itself, for
it is an essential element of that mind. Here the soul is liable to be
tempted in the direction of supposing that, since there is an evil element
that thus clings to life, no remedy can be found; but, thank God. there is
one -- the blood of Jesus Christ. And we place ourselves in a position to
receive its merits by submitting to the crucifixion of self, or by
self-abandonment. We voluntarily surrender this clinging, unclean nature
to God for death, and that in spite of its own unwillingness. Despite the
writhings and strong cries of nature to be permitted to live, in the
volition of our will we must hold it to the cross until the fire of the
Holy Ghost consumes it. From God's side the remedy is always the blood;
but man must cooperate with God in order to obtain this benefit, and he
does this by forcing his unwilling heart to stand under the burning rays
of "the Sun of Righteousness" until the last remains of sin are withered
and driven like fine dust from the heart forever
On this point Madam Guyon says:
For nature [carnality] will make use of everything to sustain its
life, as a drowning man will support himself in the water by clinging to
the blade of a razor, without adverting to the pain it causes him, if
there be nothing else within his reach. * * * * God has unrelentingly
pursued our [carnal] life into its covert hiding places; for so
malignant is it, that when hard pressed, it fortifies itself in its
refuges, and makes use of the holiest and most reasonable pretexts for
existence; but being persecuted and followed into its last retreat, in a
few souls (alas how few!) it is obliged to abandon them altogether.
When bringing yourself to this point of abandonment it may be helpful
to sing, --
"0 God, my heart doth long for thee,
Let me die! Let me die!
Now set my soul at liberty,
Let me die! Let me die!
Die to the trifling things of earth,
They're now to me of little worth,
My Savior calls -- I'm going forth,
Let me die! Let me die!
"Oh, I must die to scoffs and sneers,
Let me die! Let me die!
I must be freed from slavish fears,
Let me die! Let me die!
So dead that no desire will rise
To appear good or great or wise
In any but my Savior's eyes,
Let me die! Let me die!
"If Christ would live and reign in me,
I must die! I must die!
Like him I crucified must be,
I must die! I must die!
Lord, drive the nails, nor heed the groans,
My flesh may writhe and make its moans,
But this the way and this alone --
I must die! I must die!
"Begin at once to drive the nails,
Let me die! Let me die!
Oh, suffer not my heart to fail,
Let me die! Let me die!
Jesus, I look to thee for power,
T' enable me t' endure the hour,
When crucified by sovereign power,
I shall die! I shall die!"
There is great need of this separation of the precious from the vile,
and the seeker as he reaches this point sees it clearly. He sees how his
"time, his strength, his all," has not been as fully God's as it should
be; how his most holy actions have not been all for God; how he has loved
souls, but not altogether with a disinterested love; how desire of praise
or self-aggrandizement has influenced him to some extent all along; and
how his heart cries out with Faber, --
"Oh, I could go through life's troubles singing,
Turning earth's night to day,
If self were not so fast around me clinging
To all I do or say.
"0 Lord, that I could waste my life for others,
With no ends of my own,
That I could pour myself into my brothers
And live for them alone.
"Such is the life thou livedst, self-abjuring,
Thine own pains never easing,
Our burdens bearing, our just doom enduring,
A life without self-pleasing."
The following from Wesley, is clear as to this imperfection of the
service of the justified soul:
But let it be supposed that they continually 'watch and pray,' and so
do not enter into this temptation; that they constantly set a watch
before the door of their mouth, and keep the door of their lips; suppose
they exercise themselves herein, that all their 'conversation may be in
grace, seasoned with salt, and meet to minister grace to the hearers;'
yet do they not daily slide into useless discourse, notwithstanding all
their caution? And even when they endeavor to speak for God, are their
words pure, free from unholy mixtures? Do they find nothing wrong in
their intention? Do they speak merely to please God, and not
partly to please themselves? Is it wholly to do the will of God, and not
their own will also? Or, if they begin with a single eye, do they go on
'looking unto Jesus,' and talking with him all the time they are talking
with their neighbor? When they are reproving sin, do they feel no anger
or unkind temper to the sinner? When they are instructing the ignorant,
do they not find any pride, any self-preference? When they are
comforting the afflicted, or provoking one another to love and good
works, do they never perceive any inward self commendation as 'Now
you have spoken well.' Or any vanity, a desire that others should
think so, and esteem them on that account? In some or all of these
respects, how much sin cleaves to the best conversation even of
believers. * * * *
And how much of sin, if their conscience is thoroughly awake, may they
find cleaving to their actions also? Nay, are there not many of these,
which, though they are such as the world would condemn, yet cannot be
commended, no, nor excused, if we judge by the word of God? Are there
not many of their actions, which, they themselves know, are not to the
glory of God? Many, wherein they did not even aim at this; which were
not undertaken with an eye to God? And of those that were, are there not
many wherein their eye is not singly fixed on God? Wherein they are
doing their own will, at least as much as his, and seeking to please
themselves as much, if not more, than to please God? And while they are
endeavoring to do good to their neighbor, do they not feel wrong tempers
of various kinds? Hence their good actions, so-called, are far from
being strictly such; being polluted with such a mixture of evil. * * * *
If any man is not satisfied with this, if any believe that whoever is
justified is able to remove these sins out of his heart and life, let
him make the experiment. Let him try whether, by the grace he has
already received, he can expel pride, self-will, or inbred sin in
general. Let him try whether he can cleanse his words and actions from
all mixture of evil; whether he can avoid all uncharitable and
unprofitable conversation, with all the sins of omission; and, lastly,
whether he can supply the numberless defects which he still finds in
himself. Let him not be discouraged by one or two experiments, but
repeat the trial again and again; and the longer he tries, the more
deeply will he be convinced of his utter helplessness in all these
respects.
" * * Though we watch and pray ever so much, we cannot wholly cleanse
either our hearts or our hands. Most sure we cannot till it shall please
the Lord to speak to our hearts again, to speak the second time, Be
clean: and then only the leprosy is cleansed. Then only, the evil root,
the carnal mind, is destroyed; and inbred sin subsists no more. But if
there be no such second change, if there be no instantaneous deliverance
after justification, if there be none but a gradual work of God (that
there is a gradual work none denies), then we must be content, as well
as we can, to remain full of sin till death."
These strong words from Wesley, if taken with the context and in
connection with his other writings, do not for a moment allow of willful
crookedness in life, thought or intention in the justified soul (such
things as some people would make it appear that Wesley allows them to do),
not to the least degree, but only go to show that while inherent depravity
remains it will, to some extent, color the life and taint the desires.
This is what we have called above the "involuntary principle" that hinders
the person from being altogether "God's property." It is the "unholy
leaven" that "taints the sacrifice." The sacrifice is acceptable to God,
because it is the product of a willing heart and is the best the person
has to give and all he has to give; but it is not as pleasing as it
would be if it were "cleansed from all mixture of evil."
Bishop R. S. Foster, in "Christian Purity," says:
"Would you be holy, you must make up your mind to the crucifixion of
every sin; they must be surrendered and given to the cross and spear."
Charles Wesley has also expressed the thought of abandonment in some of
his hymns on holiness. The following are instances:
"Eager for thee, I ask, I pant,
So strong the principle divine
Carries me out with sweet constraint,
Till all my hallowed soul is thine:
Plunged in the Godhead's deepest sea,
And lost in thy immensity."
"Come, Lord, and claim me for thine own;
Savior, thy right assert;
Come, gracious Lord, set up thy throne,
And reign within my heart.
"The day of thy great power I feel,
And pant for liberty;
I loathe myself, deny my will,
And give up all to thee.
"I hate my sins, no longer mine,
For I renounce them, too;
My weakness with thy strength I join;
Thy strength shall all subdue.
"So shall I bless thy pleasing sway,
And, sitting at thy feet,
Thy laws with all my heart obey,
With all my soul submit."
We close this chapter with a few passages from Madam Guyon and
Archbishop Fenelon on the subject of abandonment.
God gives us the cross, and the cross gives us God. We may be assured
that there is an internal advancement, when there is progress in the way
of the cross; abandonment and the cross go hand in hand together. As
soon as anything is presented in the form of suffering, and you feel a
repugnance, resign yourself immediately to God with respect to it, and
give yourself up to him in sacrifice; you will then find, that when the
cross arrives, it will not be so very burdensome, because you have
yourself desired it. This, however, does not prevent you from feeling
its weight, as some have imagined: for when we do not feel the cross we
do not suffer. A sensibility of suffering is one of the principal parts
of suffering itself.'
" * * Suffer not yourselves to be attached to anything, however good it
may appear; it is no longer such to you, if it in any measure turns you
aside from what God desires of you. For the divine will is preferable to
every other good. Shake off, then, all self-interest, and live by faith
and abandonment; here it is that genuine faith begins truly to operate."
Thus does the soul ascend to God, by giving up self to the destroying
and annihilating power of divine love. This is a state of sacrifice
essential to the Christian religion, in which the soul (i. e., self-life
in the soul) suffers itself (because forced by grace coupled to
divinity) to be destroyed and annihilated, that it (the soul) may pay
homage to the sovereignty of God; as it is written: 'The power of the
Lord is great, and he is honored only by the humble.' By the destruction
of self we acknowledge the supreme existence of God. We must cease to
exist in self, in order that the Spirit of the Eternal Word may exist in
us: it is by the giving up of our own life, that we give place to his
coming; and in dying to ourselves, he himself lives in us.
We must surrender our whole being to Christ Jesus, and cease to live any
longer in ourselves, that he may become our life; that being dead, our
life may be hid with Christ in God. But how is it we are to pass into
God? In no way but by leaving and forsaking ourselves, that we may be
lost in him; and this can be effected only by annihilation, which, being
the true prayer of adoration, renders unto God alone, all blessing,
honor, glory, and power, forever and ever."
Whoever shall become acquainted with the admirable economy of grace and
the wisdom of God in bringing man to a total sacrifice of self, will be
filled with delight, and, insensible as he may be, will expire with
love. Abandonment * * * is the key to the inner court, so that he who
knows truly how to abandon himself will soon become perfect.
The following is from Fenelon, who obtained the experience of holiness
under the teachings of Madam Guyon:
The abandonment of evil things, then, consists in refusing them with
horror; of good things, in using them with moderation for our
necessities, continually studying to retrench all those imaginary wants
with which greedy nature would satiate herself.
Having abandoned everything exterior, and which is not self, it remains
to complete the sacrifice by renouncing everything interior, including
self.
Herein consists true self-abandonment; it is this spirit of
self-divesting, this use of ourselves and of ours with a single eye
to the movements of God, who alone is the true proprietor of his
creatures. You will desire to know, probably, what should be the
practice of this renouncement in detail. But I answer that the feeling
is no sooner established in the interior of the soul, than God himself
will take you by the hand, that you may be exercised in
self-renunciation in every event of every day. Self-abandonment is not
accomplished by means of painful reflections and continual struggles; it
is only by refraining from self-contemplation, and from desiring to
master ourselves in our own way, that we lose ourselves in God.
|