Verses 1-4
Mark 8:1-4. In those days, the
multitude being very great — The
multitude mentioned Matthew
15:30; and having nothing to eat
— They had, as on a former
occasion, consumed all the
provision they had brought with
them; Jesus said — I have
compassion, Greek, σπλαγχνιζομαι,
my bowels yearn, or, are moved,
toward the multitude — Who thus
flock eagerly about me, and
express such zeal in their
attendance, as to expose
themselves thereby to many
inconveniences and hardships. It
is pleasing to observe the
strong compassion which our
blessed Lord continually
discovered in all his actions
toward mankind. Because they
have now been with me three days
— It is probable that the
multitude, intent on hearing
Christ and seeing his miracles,
had lodged two nights together
in the fields, as the season of
the year was pleasant, this
event happening quickly after
the passover; and besides, the
great number of the cures which
had been wrought but just
before, might animate them to
continue with him, concluding,
perhaps, that the miraculous
power of Christ, which was
displayed in so many glorious
instances around them, would
either preserve their health
from being endangered by the
large dews which fell in the
night, or restore them from any
disorder they might contract by
their eagerness to attend on his
ministry. If I send them away
fasting, they will faint, &c. —
Our Lord by his power could as
easily have preserved them from
fainting without food, as have
created food by multiplying the
loaves and fishes for their
support, but he chose to take
the latter method. For divers of
them came from far — This our
Lord knew, and he knew also that
they were but ill furnished for
procuring provisions, or
accommodations abroad, for
themselves. His disciples
answered, From whence can a man
satisfy these men with bread,
&c. — The disciples, it seems,
did not reflect on the miracle
which Christ had lately wrought
for the relief of the five
thousand, or they did not
imagine he would repeat such a
miracle; or perhaps they thought
that Christ proposed to feed
this great multitude in the
natural way, and, therefore,
thus intimated their surprise
that he should think of doing a
thing so impracticable. Jesus
did not reprove them for their
forgetfulness of what he had so
lately done, or for their wrong
notions, but meekly asked what
meat they had, and upon their
telling him, he ordered it to be
brought, and out of seven loaves
and a few little fishes made a
second dinner for an immense
multitude by a miracle, few or
none of them having been present
at the former dinner. They seem
to have been mostly such as
followed Jesus from the coasts
of Tyre and Sidon, and the
neighbouring heathen country;
hence they are said, on seeing
his miracles, to have glorified
the God of Israel. This dinner
was in all respects like the
first, except in the number of
loaves and fishes of which it
was made, the number of persons
who were present at it, and the
number of baskets that were
filled with the fragments that
remained. “One cannot but
remark,” says Dr. Macknight,
“with what wisdom Jesus chose to
be so much in deserts during
this period of his ministry. He
was resolved, in the discharge
of the duties of it, to make as
little noise as possible, to
avoid crowds, and to be followed
only by such as had dispositions
proper for profiting by his
instructions. And, to say the
truth, not a great many others
would accompany him into
solitudes, where they were to
sustain the inconveniences of
hunger, and the weather, for
several days together. As the
multitude on this and the like
occasions remained long with
Jesus, doubtless his doctrine
distilled upon them all the
while like dew, and as the small
rain upon the tender herb. If
so, what satisfaction and
edification should we find in
the divine discourses which he
then delivered, were we in
possession of them! The
refreshment we receive from such
of them as the inspired writers
have preserved, raises an ardent
desire of the rest. At the same
time it must be acknowledged,
that we are blessed with as much
of Christ’s doctrine as is fully
sufficient to all the purposes
of salvation.”
Verses 6-9
Mark 8:6-9. He commanded the
people to sit down — The
evangelists having, in the
account of the former dinner,
described the manner in which
the multitude was set down,
thought it needless on this
occasion to say any thing of
that particular, probably
because they were ranged as
before, in companies by hundreds
and fifties. And he took the
seven loaves, and gave thanks —
He gave thanks for the fishes
separately, and distributed them
separately. So they did eat —
Matthew, they did all eat, and
were filled; were abundantly
satisfied. And they took up of
the broken meat, &c. — Which
Jesus ordered them to gather up,
that he might thus convince
them, in the strongest manner,
of the greatness of the miracle;
and teach them also, at the same
time, to use a prudent frugality
in the midst of plenty. This
miracle, and also the former of
the same kind, recorded Mark
6:40, &c., were intended to
demonstrate, that Christ was the
true bread which cometh down
from heaven; for he who was
almighty to create bread without
means to support natural life,
could not want power to create
bread without means to support
spiritual life. And this
heavenly bread we stand so much
in need of every moment, that we
ought to be always praying,
“Lord, evermore give us this
bread.”
Verses 10-13
Mark 8:10-13. He entered into a
ship, and came into the parts of
Dalmanutha — Matthew says that,
having fed the multitude, he
took ship, and came into the
coasts of Magdala: but the
evangelists may easily be
reconciled, by supposing that
Dalmanutha was a city and
territory within the district of
Magdala. The Pharisees came
forth and began to question with
him — The Pharisees, having
heard of the second miraculous
dinner, and fearing that the
whole common people would
acknowledge him for the Messiah,
resolved to confute his
pretensions fully and publicly.
For this purpose, they came
forth with the Sadducees, (see
Matthew 16:1,) who, though the
opposites and rivals of the
Pharisees in all other matters,
joined them in their design of
oppressing Jesus, and, along
with them, demanded of him a
sign from heaven, tempting, that
is, trying him. See note on
Matthew 16:1. Some think the
Jews, “understanding the
prophecy, Daniel 7:13,
literally, expected the Messiah
would make his first public
appearance in the clouds of
heaven, and take unto himself
glory and a temporal kingdom:”
and that, therefore, “when the
Pharisees desired Jesus to show
them a sign from heaven, they
certainly meant that he should
demonstrate himself to be the
Messiah, by coming in a visible
and miraculous manner from
heaven with great pomp, and by
wresting the kingdom out of the
hands of the Romans.” These
hypocrites craftily feigned an
inclination to believe, if he
could but give them sufficient
evidence of his divine mission.
However, their true design was,
that by his failing to give the
proof which they required, he
should expose himself to general
blame. And he sighed deeply in
his spirit — Feeling the
bitterest grief on account of
the incorrigibleness of their
disposition. And said, Why doth
this generation seek after a
sign — When so many signs, so
many incontrovertible proofs of
my mission from God have been
already given, and continue to
be given daily? Verily there
shall no sign be given — None
such as they seek; to this
generation — See note on Matthew
16:3-4. The original expression
here, ει δοθησεται σημειον, if a
sign shall be given, is an
elliptical form of an oath, as
is evident from Hebrews 3:11. In
ordinary cases, it may be
supplied out of the ancient
forms of swearing, thus: God do
so to me, and more also, if a
sign shall be given. But, in the
mouth of God, such an oath must
be supplied thus: Let me not be
true, if they shall enter into
my rest; if a sign shall be
given, &c. Or, as in Ezekiel
14:16, ζω εγω, ει υιοι,
θυγατερες σωθησονται, I live
not, if sons or daughters be
delivered.
Verses 14-21
Mark 8:14-21. The disciples had
forgotten to take bread, &c. —
For an explanation of this
paragraph, see note on Matthew
16:5-12. Beware of the leaven of
the Pharisees and of Herod — By
the leaven of Herod the doctrine
of the Sadducees is intended,
which was, in almost every
point, in direct opposition to
that of the Pharisees. Of the
two sects, see the note on
Matthew 3:7. And they reasoned
among themselves — They talked
privately among themselves about
the meaning of their Master’s
exhortation, and agreed that it
was a reproof for their
neglecting to take bread along
with them. When Jesus knew it —
Which he did immediately, for
the thoughts of their minds, as
well as the words of their
tongues, were all observed by
him; he saith, Why reason ye,
because ye have no bread? Why
should your neglecting to take
bread with you make you put such
an interpretation upon my words?
Perceive ye not yet, &c. — After
having been so long with me, are
ye still ignorant of my power
and goodness? Have ye your heart
yet hardened? Is no abiding
impression made yet upon your
minds by the many and great
miracles I have performed, and
the many discourses which you
have heard me deliver? Having
eyes, see ye not, &c. — As if he
had said, My miracles being all
the objects of your senses, no
extraordinary degree of capacity
was requisite to enable you to
judge of them. How came it then,
that, having the senses of sight
and hearing entire, you were not
struck with the two miracles of
the loaves and fishes, so as to
remember them, and derive
instruction from them? Our Lord
here, it must be observed,
affirms of all the apostles,
(for the question is equivalent
to an affirmation,) that their
hearts were hardened: that,
having eyes they saw not, having
ears they heard not; that they
did not consider, neither
understand; the very same
expressions that occur in the
xiiith of Matthew. And yet it is
certain that they were not
judicially hardened. Therefore
all these strong expressions do
not necessarily import any thing
more than the present want of
spiritual understanding.
Verses 22-26
Mark 8:22-26. And he cometh to
Bethsaida — Where he had done
many mighty works, without their
producing the desired effect,
the people remaining in
impenitence and unbelief,
Matthew 11:21. The following
miracle, it may be observed, is
recorded by Mark only; a plain
proof that he is not to be
considered as a mere abridger of
Matthew. And they bring him a
blind man, and besought him to
touch him — Here appears the
faith of those that brought him;
they doubted not but one touch
of Christ’s hand would restore
his sight; but the man himself
did not show that earnest desire
for, or expectation of, a cure,
that many others did. He took
and led him out of the town —
Declaring hereby, that those of
Bethsaida, who had seen so many
miracles in vain, were unworthy
to behold this: for had our Lord
herein only designed privacy, he
might have led him into a house,
or into an inner chamber, and
have cured him there. And when
he had spit on his eyes, &c. —
Our Lord could have cured this
man, as he did some others, with
a word’s speaking, but he was
pleased thus to use signs, as he
did on some other occasions,
probably with a view to assist
the man’s faith, which it seems
was very weak; it was evident,
however, that the signs which he
used had no natural tendency to
effect a cure, nor indeed had
any of the signs which our Lord
ever used on such occasions: He
asked him if he saw aught, &c. —
Jesus did not, as on other
occasions of a like nature,
impart the faculty of sight to
this blind man all at once, but
by degrees: for the man at first
saw things obscurely, and could
not distinguish men from trees,
otherwise than that he could
discern them to move. His
expression may be easily
accounted for, on supposition
that he was not born blind, but
had lost his sight by some
accident; for if that was the
case, he might have retained the
idea both of men and trees. By a
second imposition of Christ’s
hands he received a clear sight
of every object in view. Our
Lord’s intention in this might
be to make it evident that in
his cures he was not confined to
one method of operation, but
could dispense them in what
manner he pleased. In the mean
time, though the cure was
performed by degrees, it was
accomplished in so small a space
of time, as to make it evident
that it was not produced by any
natural efficacy of our Lord’s
spittle or touch, but merely by
the exertion of his miraculous
power. Christ perhaps intended,
by restoring the man’s sight
gradually, to signify in what
way those who are by nature
spiritually blind, are generally
healed by his grace. At first,
their knowledge of divine things
is indistinct, obscure, and
confused; they see men as trees
walking; but afterward, by a
second or third imposition of
the Saviour’s hands, a further
degree of spiritual discernment
is communicated, and they see
all things clearly. Their light,
like that of the morning, shines
more and more unto the perfect
day. Let us, then, inquire if we
have any sight of, or
acquaintance with, those things
of which faith is the evidence;
and if, through grace, we have
any true knowledge of them, we
may hope that it will increase
more and more, till we are fully
translated out of our natural
darkness of ignorance and folly,
into the marvellous light of
truth and wisdom. And he sent
him away, saying, Neither go
into the town — Where probably
some who had seen Christ lead
him out of the town, were
expecting to see him return; but
who, having been eye-witnesses
of so many miracles, had not so
much as the curiosity to follow
him. Such therefore were not to
be gratified with the sight of
him when he was cured, that
would not show so much respect
to Christ as to go a step out of
the town to see the cure
wrought. Nor tell it to any in
the town — Christ does not
forbid him to tell it to others,
but he must not tell it to any
of the inhabitants of Bethsaida.
Observe, reader, the slighting
of Christ’s favours is
forfeiting them; and he will
make those know the worth of
their privileges by the want of
them, that would not know them
otherwise. Bethsaida, in the day
of her visitation, would not
know the things that belonged to
her peace, and therefore they
are now hid from her eyes.
Verses 27-30
Mark 8:27-30. And Jesus went
into the towns of Cesarea
Philippi — These verses are
explained at large in the notes
on Matthew 16:13-20. He charged
them that they should tell no
man of him — He enjoined on them
silence for the present, 1st,
That he might not encourage the
people to set him up for a
temporal king; 2d, That he might
not provoke the scribes and
Pharisees to destroy him before
the time, and, 3d, That he might
not forestall the brighter
evidence which was to be given
of his divine character after
his resurrection.
Verses 31-33
Mark 8:31-33. And he began to
teach them that the Son of man
must suffer — The disciples
being now convinced that Jesus
was the Messiah, the Son of God,
and having made confession of
him as such, they were prepared
to receive this further and
equally important discovery,
which they could not have borne
before, without being so
offended as to forsake him; and
which, perhaps, they could
hardly have borne now, had they
thoroughly understood, and fully
believed, Christ’s words; for
they certainly still expected
that he would assume external
pomp and power, and restore the
kingdom of Israel, an
expectation which they held
fast, even till the day of his
ascension into heaven. And he
spake that saying openly —
παρρησια, plainly, namely to the
apostles. Our Lord frequently
after this repeated the
prediction of his sufferings;
for instance, Matthew 17:22;
Matthew 20:18; Matthew 26:2;
Luke 22:15. But it is remarkable
that on none of those occasions
was the prophecy delivered to
any but the twelve, and a few
select women, one instance
excepted, namely, Luke 17:25,
when it was expressed in terms
somewhat obscure. The multitude
of the disciples were never let
into the secret, because it
might have made them desert
Christ, as they had not, like
the apostles, raised
expectations of particular
preferments in his kingdom, to
bias their understandings, and
hinder them from perceiving the
meaning of the prediction. It is
true, he foretold his
resurrection from the dead more
publicly; for oftener than once
he appealed to it as the
principal proof of his mission,
even in the presence of the
priests, as is evident from
their mentioning it to Pilate,
Matthew 27:63. It seems the
priests had often been our
Lord’s hearers. See the notes on
Matthew 16:21-23.
Verses 34-38
Mark 8:34-38. When he had called
the people unto him — To hear a
truth of the last importance,
and one that equally concerned
them all; whosoever will come
after me — And be a disciple of
mine, entitled to all the
privileges and blessings which
belong to my disciples in this
world and the next; let him deny
himself — His own will, in all
things, great and small, however
pleasing, and that continually;
and take up his cross — Embrace
the will of God, however
painful, daily, hourly,
continually. Thus only can he
follow me in holiness to glory.
See on Matthew 16:24-26.
Whosoever shall be ashamed of me
— Poor, despised, and a man of
sorrows though I am; and of my
words — That is, of avowing by
word and action whatever I have
said, particularly this my
precept of self-denial, and
taking up the daily cross: and
whosoever is not heartily
willing to sustain the scoffs of
a wicked world, to which the
profession and practice of my
religion may expose him; of him
also shall the Son of man be
ashamed, &c. — He shall be
ashamed to acknowledge one for
his disciple who has acted in a
manner so unlike his Master, and
so unworthy of his religion. See
on Matthew 10:32-33. |