By W. J. Erdman D.D.
IV. The Seven PersonagesIntroductory Vision THE TWO SIGNS IN HEAVEN. Chapters. 12:1-13:1(a).
From the Consummation at the Seventh Trumpet, to; which the movement of the previous prophetic scenes led, the Vision returns to a time anterior to all, to the sun-clothed Woman and the “great red dragon” They are called great Signs or Wonders, most notable, most momentous. The great central section of the book (Chs. 12-14) brings to view seven great personages or “signs” or actors. They are the Woman, her Son, the “Rest of Her Seed,” the Dragon, the Archangel, and the two Beasts. This introductory vision shows that it is the Dragon, the Devil, who opposes God in his gracious purpose concerning the redemption of his people and the establishment of the Messianic Kingdom. He is seen in the following vision (Ch. 13) as the instigator and empowerer of the Beasts, but here in advance as one over come by Michael and his angels who stand up for Israel. Of old, Daniel beheld what John now sees, the same evil angels of the then unnamed Dragon warring against those of Michael and instigating them in their attempts to thwart the good intentions of the world power of Persia toward Israel. Dan. 10:12-20. First appears in this great Vision the scene of the Woman and the Son and the Dragon; then, before the further career of the Woman in the days of the great Tribulation is shown there intervenes the war of Michael against the Dragon which precedes the time of trouble, in which the “rest of her seed " suffer and overcome. 12:10 - 11. That the Woman is Israel, and her Son the Messiah, should not be a matter of doubt. The imagery of Joseph's dream, of sun and moon and stars, concerning the twelve-tribed nation, may at least suggest that the Woman represents Israel. But it is the ideal Israel and that as represented in a later day by such righteous ones of the nation as a Zacharias and Elisabeth, a Mary and Anna and Simeon. And further, to attest this view that the Woman and her Child belong in the Vision to a time anterior to all the Visions and therefore earlier than the time of the Beast and of her own flight into the “wilderness," it is sufficient to note that the “diadems” are seen on the “heads of the Dragon” and not as later on the “horns of the Beast." The Dragon is the authority behind the world power at each time, but in this Vision the “diadems " on him indicate that it was a time of sole imperialism when the Woman gave birth to the Son, whom the Dragon, as in Herod's day sought to destroy. Later, the diadems appear on the “horns " of the Beast whom the Dragon empowers. As to the Woman and the “earth," and the “waters " with which the Dragon would overwhelm her, the symbolic words suggest her deliverance from lawless, raging enemies. Also, in prophetic language the nations are viewed as a “wilderness," in which Israel temporarily lives. That the Man Child is the Messiah should hardly be called into question. In various Scriptures it is one and the same person who is to rule with a rod of iron; and to confirm all, the very promise of the same iron rule, is made to the Church, “the Body of Christ;” and if to the “Body” of which Christ is “the Head,” then the two are conjunct in such rule and the Man Child is such Head. The name ‘''rest of her seed,” viewing the Man Child of the Woman as Christ, suggests that thereby is meant the Christian Church which the Dragon endeavours to destroy. Progression THE TWO BEASTS AND THE GREAT TRIBULATION. Chapter. 13:l (b)-18.
The Vision of the Sun-Clad Woman or Daughter of Zion and her Son, of the great Dragon and the war in heaven, of the persecution of the Woman and the tribulation of “the rest of her seed” (Ch. 12), was preparatory to the Vision of the two Beasts as the great actors in the world-wide tribulation in which both Jews and Gentiles suffer, as already depicted under the “woes” of the fifth and sixth Trumpets. The time of the origin of the ten-horned Beast is a crisis in the history of the world. He is seen “coming up out of the sea,” which is symbolic of an emergence out of a condition of tumult and confusion among the nations. In the light of other prophetic words, there has been a subversion of law and order, civil and political; lawlessness prevails; all restraints have been removed, and out of this anarchy rises one of all-quelling despotic power bringing to the peoples again order indeed, but only to arrogate to himself all authority divine and human, and to become the embodiment of a lawlessness worse and more fatal to the nations than that out of which he rose. In depicting such a momentous crisis in world history, the visions of Daniel and of John in large measure agree. Both predict the existence of ten kings, and the rise of the eleventh horn. However, John beheld also a “Beast " Daniel did not see; the two-homed, lamblike, dragon-tongued supporter of the ten-horned Beast in his blasphemous claim of divine worship. This second Beast, as will be shown later, is inseparable from Christendom, from its originally formative doctrines which relate to Christ, his person and his work. This Beast was not possible in Daniel's day; he is a product of a civilization and an inheritor of ideas peculiar to the centuries of the Christian Church, and he is the perverter and denier of all that is Christian. On comparing the Scriptures concerning “the beast" or “little horn " and the “man of sin," and the “beast out of the sea," it is evident that one and the same per son is meant. The characteristics and deeds and destiny are identical. The Gentile world power is his as its final possessor. His conspicuous claim is the worship of him self as God. This Beast comes up out of the tumultuous “sea " of nations; the two-horned Beast comes “out of the earth; " the former out of anarchy, the latter out of consolidated law and order. Dan. 7:1-28; II Th. 2:1 12; Rev. 13:1-18. The first Beast performs no miracles; the language of Paul concerning him does not positively affirm that he does; it simply associates lying wonders with his coming; the second Beast performs the lying wonders to deceive men to worship the first, “the man of sin." The latter is the god, the former his prophet; the one sways the scepter of universal power, the other teaches world-wide doctrines of blasphemy against God and Christ, and uses that power to compel the assent and obedience of men to the claims of the “lawless one.” This antichristian “prophet” full of the spirit of Satan reminds one, in his origin, character and deeds and doctrines more of the Antichrist of the epistles of John than of “the man of sin” described by Paul and Daniel. II Th. 2:1-10. The name “Antichrist” has been so long applied to the latter that it may seem strange to call into question the propriety, of such application. Both Beasts are verily antichrists as opposers of Christ, both are the agents of the Dragon and empowered by him in his efforts against God and Christ, but the first Beast is more than an antichrist; he is a false Christ in relation to the Jew, is secular and imperial, while the office of the lamb like Beast is spiritual and religious. Their opposition in doctrine is against the Jehovah of the Israelite and the Christ of the Church; and as to rule, they rage against Jehovah and his Messiah. The “mystery of lawlessness” which was to be consummated in the coming of the “lawless one,” was already working in the early years of the Church; and in the later years there were many antichrists forerunners of the Antichrist, false prophets to be followed by the one great “false prophet,” also many false Messiahs to be followed at last by the one, great and final false Messiah. He will be pre eminently “the lawless one.” Both “beasts” are de ceivers as is the devil who uses them. The one is the Lie of whom Paul speaks, the other the Liar foretold by John; and the devil the father of both. “The Liar” of John’s epistles will uphold “the Lie” of Paul’s; the “Antichrist” of the Church will be the deceiver in behalf of the false Messiah of the Jews; the denier of the Son will demand obedience to the substitute of the Son. For both the masterpiece of Satan will be prepared, the new religion of antichristianity. The old Christianity will be deemed, as even now by many, to have outlived itself. In its stead appears a blasphemous mimicry of the old in doctrines and forms; man its god and object of worship; dragon, beast, and prophet an infernal trinity opposing Father, Son and Holy Spirit each in his own sphere of salvation; all is demonic in signs and miracles attesting his Lie by which opposers of the Truth will be deluded. The confession of the Father and the Son through the Holy Spirit will be supplanted by the Confession of the Dragon and the Beast through the lying spirit of the false Prophet. In the return of imperialism through the sovereignty of the Beast and the dechristianization of all that once constituted the governments of Christendom, the “deadly wound” (the death stroke) of ancient imperialism is healed and the nations return to their original, godless civilization and culture. It will be a gigantic final at tempt of men to realize the primal lie of the serpent “ye shall be as gods,” whose poison infused into the heart of man with the first sin has been transmitted from generation to generation ever since. The Creed of the Antichrist will be:
Episode THE FIRST FRUITS AND THE THREE ANGELS, Chapter. 14:1-13.
Here again is an interlude. As between the sixth and seventh Seals, and between the sixth and seventh Trumpets, so here, in the midst of the dramatic movement, occurs this Episode. The purpose is the same as that of the other Episodes. It is to console and to encourage the people of God. Such is the intent of the vision of the First Fruits and of the message of the Three Angels. Like all the Episodes of the Apocalypse, this is both restrospective and prospective. It retrogresses to the very beginning of the great tribulation which is viewed in 13:1— IS as past, and thus as an Episode it is Retrospective in its warnings against the Worship of the Beast and in its word of comfort to the Martyrs. It is also prospective in announcing the Judgment to come. It is taught by some that these First Fruits represent a class of Christians who now any day even before the “end of the age” may be removed from the earth into glory while the rest of the Church will be left to the time of the Tribulation. It is enough to answer that first fruits always belong to a harvest, and the harvest of parables and prophecy belongs to the “end of the age/' and that therefore even if such a special class of Christians exist, they cannot be removed very long before the time of the Harvest. On the other hand, it is more likely in view of the time of sifting and in view of the peculiar character given them and in contrast with “Babylon” and her “daughters” (whose fall is announced in this same Epitome) that they are the Church in her ideal character, even the “people of God” who came out of “Babylon” before her destruction by the Beast and his Kings. Three things are spoken of the “first fruits":1, that they are virgins undefiled with women, that is, with “the harlots” of Babylon; 2, that in their mouth was found no lie, that is, they have nought to do with the lies of this time of the great liar, the Man of Sin; and 3, “they are without blemish,” which is the character and standing of the saints of the elect Church of the Epistles. Also, they have the name of the Lamb and his Father's name written on their foreheads, two of the three names to be written upon the overcomers of the Church in Philadelphia. It is as such, purified and pure, she is seen as proleptic of her pure and perfect presentation to the Lord with whom she is to be and whom she is to follow forevermore. This is the procedure predicted for the people of God; they first are disciplined through persecution of enemies, and then, in turn, the latter are punished. Judgment be gins at the house of God; the Tribulation will separate the wheat from the chaff. I Pet. 4:17; Prov 11:31; Jer. 25:29; Is. 10:12. In addition to this, the evident typical teaching of the first fruits in Leviticus should not be slighted. Both the Passover sheaf and the Pentecost sheaf are termed the “first fruits”; the former, that of Christ, is for our “acceptance,” the Church is accepted in Christ and is as he is; and the latter, that of the Church, is “for the Priest”; i. e., Christ. Also, the “barley” and the “wheat” are spoken of as one harvest. In view of all this, these redeemed ones should not be regarded as a holier and more worthy number of the Church who would be removed from the earth before the reaping of the rest, but rather as the “Body of Christ,” now corresponding to the ideal holiness and unity which is always set before her. Levit. 23:4-22; Eph. 5:22-23. Consummation THE HARVEST AND THE VINTAGE. Chapter. 14:14-20.
The Harvest and the Vintage cannot be viewed as two aspects of the judgment on the enemies of God. When the treading of the winepress is described, there is nothing corresponding to the Harvest. On the other hand, the very imagery of “the Son of Man on a white cloud,” sending forth his sickle of angel-reapers, agrees with various Scriptures concerning the Parousia of Christ for the saints. The parable of the wheat and tares in the gospel of Matthew and this Vision mutually interpret each other. What additional events besides those of the gathering of the tares and garnering of the wheat belong to this “time of the harvest” must be learned from other Scriptures. The parable confines itself to the two. Of these the gathering of the tares comes first. It accordingly precedes the garnering of the wheat which in other prophetic language is called the Rapture of the saints to meet the Lord at his Coming. The tares, however, are not burned until after the garnering of the wheat; the saints are delivered from the wrath to come; but the deliverance and the wrath are not far apart. The gathering of the tares and the garnering of the wheat predicted in the Parable have a remarkable confirmation, both as to the agency of angels and the order of events in the Visions of this Epitome of the “end.” It is also suggestive that the preaching foretold in this Epitome is of a character indicating that men have be come deniers of God not only as the God of Redemption, but even of God as the Creator. A final appeal is made to the primitive and universal and everlasting revelation of God in “the things that are made”
|
|
|