By Johann Peter Lange
Edited by Rev. Marcus Dods
THE HISTORICAL DELINEATION OF THE LIFE OF JESUS.
THE TIME OF JESUS APPEARING AND DISAPPEARING AMID THE PERSECUTIONS OF HIS MORTAL ENEMIES.
SECTION XVIII
the more distinct announcement
of Jesus, that he was on the
point of taking leave of the
Jewish people
(Joh 8:21-30)
The feast was coming to its
close; the multitudes were on
the point of departing; and so
Jesus also meditated soon again
leaving this scene of His
activity. His sensibility was
moved by the thought of His
leaving the people and the
temple, in which, as His
Father’s house, He would once,
when a boy, have been fain to
make His abode. And on the
present occasion, in the
constant sense which He had of
His approaching death, it would
readily occur to Him to feel
that this departure was becoming
for Him the symbol of His soon
having to go away from this
temple and from His people; of
that great departure of His
which was being brought about
not only through His death, but
also through the great
separation which was arising
between unbelieving Israel and
His Spirit. He therefore now
afresh recurred to the words
which He had already spoken to
the servants of the Sanhedrim.
‘I go My way’ (He said), ‘and ye
shall seek Me; but in your sin
shall ye die’ (perish). It stood
before the soul of our Lord, how
often with more or less
clearness of consciousness they
would seek the Messias who alone
could deliver. In the sequel,
this ‘seeking’ exhibited itself
in the most dreadful
distinctness at the moment when
Jerusalem was being stormed by
the Romans, and the temple was
in flames.1 Thus Jesus in spirit
sees His people perishing in
despair. Then the thought seems
to arise in His mind, If ye
could only follow Me in death!
But with sorrow of heart He was
constrained to declare to them,
‘Whither I go, ye cannot come.’
The Jews did indeed understand
that He had the other world in
His thoughts, and remarked now,
with sarcastic malice, ‘He does
not mean to kill Himself, does
He?’ In this case, according to
the popular views current among
them, He would go to the lowest
hell, and then certainly His
word (they thought) would be
fulfilled, that they would not
be able to reach Him in the
other world.2 They had no
foreboding how many of them in
the Jewish war would be brought
by desperation to die by their
own hand, and thus to fall under
their own sentence of
condemnation. Jesus answered
them sharply, ‘Ye are from
beneath,’ belong to the lower
world (this inferior region of
worldly sentiment, which stands
connected with the abyss of
despair and of despairing men,
of self-murderers); ‘I am from
above,’ belong to the upper
world, and to the superior
region of life in God, in which
no despair is possible-to the
realm of the blessed. And why is
there such a chasm between them?
He explains why, in the words,
‘Ye are of this world, I am not
of this world.’ They, with their
worldly mind, with their aims
all become worldly, were
swallowed up and lost deep in
the feelings belonging to the
finite world; they therefore
were liable, in the anguish of
this perishable world, to sink
into despondency and to despair.
He, on the other hand, in His
divine consciousness was raised
above the finite world; He saw
this world itself, not in the
form in which it presents itself
to the children of the world, as
a comfortless conglomeration of
finite objects, but as it
appears in the Spirit of God, as
a holy building of everlasting
realities, a building which out
of the obscurations of sin and
misery is ever emerging brighter
and clearer. And inasmuch as, in
a spirit of contempt, they had
thrown out against Him the
reproach, that possibly in
despair He would commit suicide,
He prophesies to them once again
that they would surely die in
their sins. He added, indeed, to
this solemn asseveration a
condition; for there was no dark
fate of death controlling their
future; but the condition
related to just their behaviour
towards Himself. It was couched
in the words, ‘For if ye believe
not that I am,1 ye shall die in
your sins.’
Upon this they replied
impetuously, and with excited
interest, ‘Who art Thou then?’
Perpetually there looked out
from the background of their
converse with Him the spirit of
chiliasm; and gladly would they
have heard from His lips the
literal announcement that He was
the Messias, the Messias in the
sense in which they were
expecting Him. They now thought
themselves near the removal of
that long reserve of His which
had made them His deadly
enemies,-to the solution of that
riddle which had so long
perplexed them, how it was that
He could always be intimating
that He was the Promised One of
God, whilst He yet would not
openly come forward as the
Messias.
The tone of excitement which
marks their question is made
more palpable by the air of
extreme composure which marks
Jesus’ answer. Who art Thou
then? they asked with the most
pressing urgency. He answered,
‘To start with, He whom I
represent Myself as being.’2 For
the present, that is, He would
have that only be their concern
which He was declaring
respecting Himself, namely, that
He was the Light of the World,
the Fountain of Life. In these
purely spiritual attributes must
they first receive Him, if they
would later learn to know Him
as, in the right sense, the
Messias.
For the present, therefore, in
the revelation of Himself with
which He confronts them He
abides by that which He has
already said in reference to His
relation to them. ‘But why so
mysterious?’ they might be
disposed to ask. The explanation
lies in His further statement,
that ‘He had still so many
things to say concerning them,
yea, and so many to judge in
them;’ implying that they were
as yet not capable of grasping
the entire meaning of His
personality. But, however, this
difficult posture of things
(which fundamentally and in
general continues, and will
continue to the end of the
world) must not perplex Him,
must not perplex them. For ‘He
that had sent Him was true;’ and
He, the Sent, on His side was
faithful in His mission: ‘He
announced to the world only what
He in the Spirit had heard from
Him who sent Him.’
They needed first to learn to
feel and estimate the truth of
His mission in the agreement
which subsisted between His word
and the eternal laws of God
implanted in their bosoms,
implanted in the very life of
the world; this immediate,
essential truthfulness of His
whole ministry must they first
recognize; and then there would
be a chance of their seeing
clearly His connection with the
Old Testament and with their Old
Testament expectations. As long
as they did not know the Messias
in His true ideality, so long He
could not venture to announce
Himself to them as the
historical Messias; because
their ideal was a political
caricature, into which they
would of course be glad to
absorb Jesus Himself, and thus
seek to gratify the dreams of
their political fanaticism.1
At present, however, they were
thoroughly set up with all the
giddiness of their Messianic
delusion; and therefore they did
not understand that, in speaking
of Him that sent Him, He was
speaking of the Father.2 They
appear desirous of catching
scent of some secret reference
in what He said. And now a
mysterious word of Jesus was to
serve for their trial. It ran
thus: ‘When ye shall have lifted
up the Son of man, then shall ye
know that I am He.’
To this He added: ‘I do nothing
of My own self; but as My Father
hath taught Me, even so I speak;
and He who sent Me is with Me.
The Father hath not left Me in
My doings to Myself, for I do
what pleases Him.’
This word had a pure, deep
christological sense: it marked
the future of Christ as it stood
clearly forth to His spirit.
They were about to lift Him up
on the cross. But thereby they
were destined unwittingly to
bring about His lifting up to
the right hand of God, and His
lifting up to be King of nations
and Judge of the world. In this
sense He combines the ironical
lifting up on the cross, which
lies before Him, as the king of
the Jews by them proscribed and
rejected, with His true lifting
up in all its extended meaning.3
When they should so lift Him up
(He Said), they should know,
they should learn by experience,
who He was. That He claimed to
be the Messias, this (we cannot
doubt) they already knew when
they lifted Him up on the cross;
for they made those very
political designs a matter of
charge against Him which they
had in vain sought to drive Him
to engage in. But yet more were
they in the course of the
world’s history, as the
dispersed among Christians, to
be taught the truth that He was
the real Prince of nations; and
quite clear shall this become to
them at the end of days, to
their too late amazement and
terror, or even to their
long-delayed salvation. But if
individuals among them
understood His intimation, and
were disposed to ask, Why dost
Thou not prevent a
misapprehension of Thy person so
fearfully tragical, and which
will only be done away by a late
acknowledgment brought about in
so dreadful a manner? the answer
ran thus: ‘I do nothing for
Myself.’ Only that which the
Father commissioned Him to speak
through the Holy Ghost,
according to the position
assigned to Him, was He able to
say to them, and beyond that
nothing. That He should make
Himself known to them as the
Messias, this was made an
impossibility for Him through a
solemn not yet on the part of
the Father Himself, spoken
through signs which the Father
gave in the light of facts
illustrated by His Spirit. Here
in the holiest sense it might be
said, ‘For mystery my duty is.’
He indeed felt clearly how deep
this reserve would plunge Him in
suffering,-suffering reaching
apparently even to the most
horrible ‘being left alone.’ But
nevertheless it was certain to
His mind that the Father would
not, however, leave Him
alone;-as certain as it was
clear to Him that He did what
pleased Him, that He acted in
conformity with His direction.
These solemn words of Jesus made
a remarkably strong and
favourable impression upon the
Jews who were around Him. ‘When
He spoke these things’ (reports
the Evangelist), ‘many believed
on Him.’ It was as if the wind
of antagonistic feeling had
suddenly chopped round in His
favour. Many gave to understand
that they were minded to pay Him
their homage: it seemed as if He
had suddenly won a numerous band
of new disciples.
How are we to interpret this
surprising phenomenon? These
‘believers’ came round Him, no
doubt, full of chiliastic
excitement, and listening to
catch something from His lips
which should fall in with their
sentiments: they no doubt
understood His last words quite
in a Jewish sense. ‘When ye have
lifted up the Son of man, then
shall ye know that I am He.’ Yes
(we may suppose they thought),
we must ourselves first begin to
act in the way of exalting Him,
and then, when He sees that He
can reckon upon us, He will
forthwith announce and verify
His real character to our
complete satisfaction. ‘I can do
nothing of myself (He had
further said); but as the Father
has instructed me, so I speak.’
This made it quite clear to them
that the best considered policy
determined Him in not
forestalling the developments of
popular feeling, and that in
this cautious course He was
following secret directions from
above. And when He then lastly
declared that the Father would
not leave Him alone, but at the
right time would support Him
because He was His favourite, it
was not at all unnatural,
considering the line which their
thoughts were taking, that they
should arrive at the conjecture
that He was speaking of some
powerful help available for the
execution of His plans,
consisting of heavenly agents,
or even of worldly ones,
confederate with Him.
note
There is a difficulty in the
circumstance that the Jews who
in ver. 30 stand forth as
believing on Jesus, are so soon
as in ver. 37 again charged by
Jesus with murderous thoughts
against Him. Some (see Tholuck,
p. 230) explain it by the
consideration, that the
spokesmen sometimes change, and
that in ver. 37 the same persons
again take up the word who were
the speakers from ver. 21. But
the representation which John
gives does not warrant us in
supposing that the believers
mentioned in ver. 30 are gone
into the background when Christ
uttered the reproaches of ver.
37. The whole connection leads
us rather to suppose (in the
manner proposed above) that the
faith of these many who so
suddenly became believers was of
a kind on which no reliance
could be placed.
───♦───
Notes
|
|
|