By Arthur Zepp
PREACHING TO CONSCIENCEThe history of all great preachers who have bee
instrumental in God's hands of promoting powerful revivals of religion, reveals the fact without ex ion, that they all
appealed directly to the consciences of their hearers. This is clearly
recognized to be the secret of their success. Emerson recognized this element in Finney's
preaching, and to it attributed, in a large measure, his popularity and
success. Finney's sermons and autobiography abound in appeals to conscience. P John Wesley said he dare no more preach a fine
sermon than wear a fine coat. Well he knew, in thee language of another,
"to preach a beautiful sermon 'was often to preach a useless one," so far as conscience penetrating power was concerned.
Consequently, we find his writings and sermons replete with simple, direct,
often homely, address, to the heart and conscience. Mueller early learned, in his remarkable career
of faith achievement, the impossibility of power in prayer and preaching, while
living in the practice of any known sin. His life motto, taken from Paul's
words, "I exercise myself always to
have a conscience void of offense toward God and man," was the chief
secret of his success. Evan Roberts, the Welsh revivalist, was enabled
by the Spirit's help to ask very searching
questions of the Christians, which cut the heart as a knife and probed the
inmost depths of conscience, bringing a sense of guilt, contrition, and sorrow,
ultimating in broken, penitent, obedient hearts. Hence, the remarkable Welsh revival. Sam Jones attributed his power over men to his
direct appeals to their consciences. The simple remark: "If the wives of some of you husbands knew you
as well as God does, they would give you a wider berth than was ever given an
Eastern leper," went home to the heart of a prominent church member,
causing him first to rave at the Evangelist, and later to confess and bitterly
repent of his double hypocritical life. There are many similar instances, in
the history of great preachers, of the power of direct address, under heavenly
unction, to arouse, convince, convict, and reform the conscience. The great apostle to the gentiles, Paul, said,
in his preaching the word, he always "commended himself to every man's
conscience in the sight of God"‑he addressed the conscience of his
hearers. This habit was also a distinguishing mark of the
peer of all preachers. He who "spake
as never man spake." On one occasion
every one of his hearers went out from His presence, crestfallen, and with
downcast look‑"being convicted by his own conscience." On
another occasion, when His audience was composed of only one, there was such
conscience penetrating power in the few words He spoke, that in haste she fled
to her own town, and said to her neighbors, "Come, see a man, who told me
all the things that I ever did." The hypocritical Pharisees writhed under
His searching messages. The Pentecostal Preacher so drove His
exhortation home that His audience was pricked in their hearts. The martyr,
Stephen, succeeded in penetrating the hearts of his hearers, though he
forfeited his life for his boldness. John, the Baptist, lost his head for his
fearlessness in informing Herod his marriage to his brother's wife, while he
lived, was legalized adultery. Time would fail us to tell of the hosts of
fearless men and women of God, who have boldly looked into the faces of
scorners, hypocrites, and pharisaical professors, and have driven home to the
conscience the rugged truths of God until men, demons and 'devils have raved
and gnashed on them with their teeth;' but God has always stood by them with
supernatural power "from on high" and given them trophies of victory
on every battlefield. From the foregoing examples we can readily see,
when we reflect, God's word, which liveth and abideth ever,.. has not changed,
nor lost an iota of its power, and that men's hearts and sin are the same in
all ages; that the days in which we live are not, as supposed by many leaders,
days of decay of conscience or lethargic
conscience more than formerly. We repeat it, the days in which we live are no more days of decay of conscience or
lethargic conscience than former days have been (though there is an
abundance of decay of conscience in the church and world with us). But our firm
conviction (based on a wide observation and many incriminating confessions of
ministers), is, that we are living in days when conscience is not appealed to,
and aroused, from the pulpit, as was the case with the founders of Methodism,
Finney and many others. Oh, it may be popular to ridicule their methods' and
messages as antiquated and out of date, but those who do so with all their
advanced philosophies and new ideas of promoting God's work so as to gain the
commendation of the Twentieth Century
intelligence, fail to see the real moral awakenings and transformations of
character our fathers saw. It is surely incumbent on those who discard the
old‑time preachers and evangelism, for the new evengelism, to produce results in
awakening, repentance, regeneration, sanctification and holy living
commensurate to theirs. A Defect of Much Modern Preaching Lies in This It lacks those elements of God accompaniment and
penetrative unction which carry the truth of God, out of the letter which killeth, in the Spirit, which maketh
alive, straight home to the conscience with such force as to produce change in
the character of the hearers. This is true Gospel preaching with the Holy
Ghost, sent down from heaven.‑The real dynamic preaching's test is this:
Ability to reform the heart and correct wrong practices in life. Legion is the number who have been deceived into thinking all duty was
done by keeping a good feeling among the flock‑and this is often done at
the fearful cost of compromise of God's truth. By their own confession they
fail to bring on the issue, and arouse the conscience and reprove the heart and
correct the wrong practice, lest they offend. But should not the fear of
offending God overshadow all other fears? Indeed, so much is this cringing,
fawning, fearful spirit manifest that hearers are sometimes assured by advance
announcement, "they need not fear being placed in an embarrassing
position" by waiting on certain ministries. We would not be misunderstood
to advocate any one should study to embarrass; but, this is a natural result of
plain, faithful preaching: Those not right with God are searched out, reproved
and made uncomfortable until sin is abandoned. A prominent business man, a member of a leading
church, said to us, concerning his pastor's preaching: "No one, saint or
sinner, can find any fault with Dr.
------‘s sermons. They are faultless from one point of view‑they never
hit anybody." And yet, before the Well we know the present demand for
"literary treats" and the discussion of the popular themes of the
day. All who stand behind the sacred desk in this age have our heartfelt
sympathy. Their two‑fold responsibility to God and men is fearful. Their
dependence on their parishioners for bread (so they think, when faith is low;
but God is the real source), doubtless betrays, subtly, many into keeping back
needed truth. We are sure, however, if the eye is kept on Jesus, and the last
day of solemn account the fear will be to fail to declare the whole counsel of God or fail to keep
back any profitable truth. A young minister, in a service in
which the power of God was manifestly felt, confessed to us his strong
temptation to evade duty, and to popularity. Our reply was that we,
personally, were strongly tempted to
please Jesus. As to the common objection, "I will not get
my salary if I preach my convictions," we have a profound conviction we
will not get our needs supplied if we fail to obey God. And after seventy‑five
thousand miles travel (quite an expense item in itself), and over ten years
ministry, in which, by God's grace, we have never consciously kept back any
truth from the people God laid on our hearts; we can testify, without begging
or stipulating, God has abundantly supplied every need. So will
He, we are convinced, supply the needs of everyone who truly obeys Him and
preaches the truth He bids. A Probable Explanation Of the failure to address conscience may
doubtless be in the fact, the preacher, in order to appeal to the conscience of
others, must live on good terms with his
own conscience! Paul recognized the danger of preaching to
others, and himself becoming a castaway. As a preventive measure of this, he
exercised himself (worked himself up) "to have a conscience void of
offense toward God and man," and beat his body, literally "black and
blue" and kept it under. It is evident one has little heart to preach to
others a standard which he, himself, has failed to attain; or, to preach on
faithful stewardship, when be, personally, robs God of "tithes of love and
willing service; of tithes of silver and of gold;" or, it is difficult to
preach with any heart or power on the "baptism of power," when one's
own life is powerless and fruitless; or, on purity, when impurity lurks in heart and
thought life; or, on selfdenial, when we pamper self
and live to conform to the fashions and extravagances of the day! As hard as it may seem these facts explain the silence of many
pulpits on vital themes. Let the preacher remember, as an incentive to
preach directly to the conscience, that he will only, in the Great Solemn
judgment Day, receive credit from God for those whose consciences he has, under
God, succeeded in awakening, reforming,
and strengthening in all goodness so that they can stand "and having done all, stand until the pearly gates
unfold," and He will not be content with mere decisions, or surface work
evidences of success, which often leave the life unchanged. |
|
|